Rules for evaluating competitive bids under 44 fz. On what criteria the customer chooses the supplier. What will help you win the purchase
General rules applied in the evaluation of applications
- Evaluation of applications according to cost evaluation criteria
- Evaluation of applications according to non-monetary evaluation criteria
|
Attention! |
When conducting a tender (open, closed, two-stage, with preliminary selection), customers are obliged to use Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 28, 2013 N 1085 “On approval of the Rules for evaluating applications, final proposals of participants in the procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs "(hereinafter - Government Decree of November 28, 2013 N 1085, Rules).
|
Attention! To facilitate the work and comply with the procedure for holding an open tender, you can use the reference information “Working calendar of an open tender under 44-FZ”. |
The Rules establish the main criteria that the customer can use when evaluating applications. Among the criteria are: cost and non-value.
Cost criteria include:
1. Price of the contract;
2. Expenses for the operation and repair of goods (objects), the use of the results of work;
3. The cost of the life cycle of a product (object) created as a result of work in individual cases;
4. A proposal for the amount of the customer's relevant costs that the customer will incur or incur under the energy performance contract.
Non-value criteria include:
1. Qualitative, functional and environmental characteristics of the procurement object;
2. Qualification of procurement participants, including:
- availability of financial resources, equipment and other material resources belonging to them on the right of ownership or on other legal grounds;
- availability of work experience related to the subject of the contract, and business reputation;
- Availability of specialists and other employees of a certain skill level.
General rules applied in the evaluation of applications
Methodology for evaluating applications according to the criteria for evaluating applications The procedure for evaluating a participant in the Request for Proposals
Table for determining the final rating of participants in the request for proposals.
Output:__________________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluation of applications by the criterion "contract price"
("contract price per unit of work")
A max - the initial (maximum) price of the contract, set in the documentation of the request for proposals in rubles;
A i - offer of the i-th participant of the request for proposals at the price of the contract.
2. When evaluating bids according to the criterion "price of the contract" "price of the contract per unit of work", the best condition for the execution of the contract according to the specified criterion is the proposal of the participant in the request for proposals with the lowest price of the contract.
Evaluation of applications by criterion
"turnaround time"
Within the framework of the specified criterion, the term for the completion of work or several terms during which the Participant in the request for proposal must perform the work is estimated.
For evaluation, in the Documentation on the Request for Proposals, units of measurement of the term are established: work. days
F max - the maximum period for completing work (in working days).
F i - proposal of the i-th participant of the request for proposals on the term of work.
5. When evaluating bids according to the criterion "terms for the completion of work", the best condition for the execution of the contract according to the specified criterion is the proposal of the participant in the request for proposals with the shortest deadline for the completion of work. For the purpose of evaluating and comparing bids in bids with a work completion time of less than half of the maximum work completion time set in the RFP documentation, such bids are assigned a rating of 5 on the specified criterion.
final score, awarded to the current Application for participation in the request for proposals, is determined by the formula:
R i = R ai + R fi
- the final score assigned to the current application;
- score awarded to the current application according to the criterion contract price;
R fi - the number of points assigned to the current application according to the criterion deadline.
The assessment is made on the basis of the Application for participation in the request for proposals, documents and information that are an integral part of the application.
The application of the participant who scored the maximum final score is assigned the first number.
The winner of the request for proposals is the participant in the request for proposals who offered the best conditions for the execution of the contract and whose application for participation in the request for proposals was assigned the first number.
This procedure is used to evaluate applications for participation in the tender and evaluate applications for participation in the request for proposals.
To apply this procedure, the Customer must include in the tender documentation, documentation on the request for proposals specific criteria from among the following, specify the subject of assessment for each criterion, establish requirements for the provision of documents and information according to the subject of assessment for each criterion, establish the significance of the criteria.
The cumulative significance of all criteria should be equal to 100%.
Evaluation and comparison of applications in order to determine the winner (winners) of the procedure is carried out by the procurement commission, with the involvement, if necessary, of experts in the relevant area of the subject of procurement.
Applications can be evaluated using the following criteria with their respective marginal significances:
|
Criteria number |
Application Evaluation Criteria |
To conduct an assessment, the documentation must establish: |
Significance of criteria in percent. The exact significance of the criterion must be established by the customer in the documentation |
|
Contract price |
Initial contract price |
Not less than 20% |
|
|
Qualification of the participant (experience, education, personnel qualification, business reputation) |
A specific subject of evaluation by criterion (for example, experience is evaluated at the cost of previously performed similar work) Forms to be completed by the participant in the relevant subject matter (e.g. a table reflecting the participant's experience) Requirements for the provision of documents and information on the relevant subject of assessment (for example, copies of previously concluded contracts and acceptance certificates) |
No more than 70% |
|
|
Product quality |
No more than 70% |
||
|
Availability of production facilities |
No more than 70% |
||
|
Delivery time (performance of work, provision of services) |
Maximum acceptable period and minimum acceptable period. The minimum period can not be set and then it can be considered equal to 0 for calculation according to the evaluation formula |
Not more than 50% |
|
|
Warranty period for goods (result of work, result of services) |
Minimum acceptable time |
No more than 30% |
To evaluate the application, the final rating is calculated for each application. The final application rating is calculated by adding the ratings for each application evaluation criterion, multiplied by their significance.
The rating of the application for each criterion is the score in points obtained from the results of the assessment by the criteria. The fractional value of the rating is rounded to two decimal places after the decimal point according to the mathematical rounding rules. At the same time, for rating calculations, a significance coefficient equal to the value of the corresponding criterion in percent divided by 100 is applied.
The assignment of a serial number to each application as the degree of attractiveness of the participant's proposal decreases is based on the results of calculating the final rating for each application. The application with the highest final rating is assigned the first number. The first number can be assigned to several applications with the highest overall rating. Further distribution of serial numbers of applications is carried out in descending order of the final rating.
Applications are evaluated in the following order.
Amax - initial contract price;
Ai is the contract price offered by the i-th participant.
To obtain a rating of applications according to the criteria "Qualification of the participant", "Quality of goods", "Availability of production capacities", each application for each of the criteria is assigned a value from 0 to 100 points by the procurement commission.
Bmax - the maximum delivery time (performance of work, provision of services) established by the customer in the documentation, in units of measurement of the delivery time (period) (number of years, quarters, months, weeks, days, hours) from the date of conclusion of the contract;
Bmin - the minimum delivery time (performance of work, provision of services) established by the customer in the documentation, in units of measurement of the delivery time (period) (number of years, quarters, months, weeks, days, hours) from the date of conclusion of the contract;
Bi - the offer contained in the i-th application for the delivery time (performance of work, provision of services), in units of measurement of the delivery time (period) (number of years, quarters, months, weeks, days, hours) from the date of conclusion of the contract.
Rfrom i
- rating awarded to the i-th application according to the specified criterion;Cmin - the minimum period for providing a guarantee of the quality of goods, works, services, established by the customer in the procurement documentation;
Ci is the proposal of the i-th participant for the term of guaranteeing the quality of goods, works, services.
In order to evaluate and compare proposals in bids with a period for providing a guarantee of the quality of goods, works, services that exceeds by more than half the minimum period for providing a guarantee of the quality of goods, works, services established in the procurement documentation, such applications are assigned a rating of 50 according to the specified criterion. .
In this case, the contract is concluded on the conditions for this criterion specified in the application. The fulfillment of the guarantee obligation is carried out by the participant with whom the contract is concluded, without charging an additional fee, except for the price of the contract.
The Procurement Commission has the right not to determine the winner, if, according to the results of the evaluation of applications, none of the applications receives more than 25 points in total.
1The Procurement Regulations are approved:
1) the supreme governing body of a state corporation or state company if the customer is a state corporation or state company;
2) the head of a unitary enterprise if the customer is a state unitary enterprise or a municipal unitary enterprise;
3) the supervisory board of an autonomous institution if the contracting authority is an autonomous institution;
4) the board of directors (supervisory board) of a business company if the customer is a joint-stock company, or the collegial executive body of such a joint-stock company if the charter of the business company provides for the functions of the board of directors (supervisory board) of the general meeting of shareholders of the business company;
5) a general meeting of participants in the company if the customer is a limited liability company.
2Qualifications must be expressed in measurable units, for example,
At least 5 years of experience in providing similar services
Experience in performing similar work in the amount of at least 15 million rubles,
Owning or leasing production facilities, namely: at least two tower cranes, warehouses with an area of at least 2,000 sq.m.,
The presence of departmental and / or state awards (at least three), etc.
3 The list of information contained in the notice of purchase may be expanded at the discretion of the Customer, including depending on the method of purchase being carried out.
4 The list of information contained in the procurement documentation may be expanded at the discretion of the Customer, including depending on the procurement method being carried out.
14. When evaluating bids by the criterion "contract price" ("contract price per unit of goods, work, services"), the use of sub-criteria is not allowed.
15. To determine the rating of the application according to the criterion "contract price" ("contract price per unit of goods, work, services"), the initial (maximum) price of the contract (the sum of the initial (maximum) prices per unit of goods, work, services, provided for in the tender documentation, if the criterion "contract price per unit of goods, work, services" is applied).
| Ra_i = | A_max - A_i | x 100 | , |
| A_max |
A_max - the initial (maximum) price of the contract, established in the tender documentation (the sum of the initial (maximum) prices for a unit of goods, work, services, established in the tender documentation) in accordance with paragraph 15 of these Rules;
A_i - offer of the i-th bidder at the price of the contract (based on the sum of prices per unit of goods, work, services).
17. To calculate the final rating for an application in accordance with paragraph 11 of these Rules, the rating awarded to this application according to the criterion "contract price" ("contract price per unit of goods, work, services") is multiplied by the significance corresponding to the specified criterion.
18. When evaluating bids according to the criterion "price of the contract" ("price of the contract per unit of goods, work, services"), the best condition for the execution of the state (municipal) contract according to the specified criterion is the offer of the tender participant with the lowest contract price (with the lowest sum of prices per unit goods, works, services).
The state (municipal) contract is concluded on the conditions for this criterion specified in the application.
1) contract price;
2) expenses for the operation and repair of goods, the use of the results of work;
3) qualitative, functional and environmental characteristics of the procurement object;
4) the qualifications of the procurement participants, including the availability of financial resources, on the right of ownership or other legal basis of equipment and other material resources, work experience related to the subject of the contract, and business reputation, specialists and other employees of a certain skill level.
3. In the cases provided for in accordance with Part 16 of Article 34 of this Federal Law, as well as in other cases established by the Government of the Russian Federation to evaluate the applications of procurement participants, the customer in the procurement documentation instead of the criteria specified in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Part 1 of this Article, has the right to establish as a criterion the cost of the life cycle of a product or an object created as a result of the performance of work. The criterion of the cost of the life cycle of a product or an object created as a result of the performance of work includes the costs of purchasing the product or performing the work, subsequent maintenance, operation during its service life, repair, disposal of the delivered product or the object created as a result of the work. The calculation of the cost of the life cycle of a product or an object created as a result of the performance of work is carried out taking into account the methodological recommendations provided for by Part 20 of Article 22 of this Federal Law.
4. In the procurement documentation, the customer is obliged to indicate the criteria used in determining the supplier (contractor, performer) and their significance values. At the same time, the number of criteria used in determining the supplier (contractor, performer), with the exception of cases where an auction is held, must be at least two, one of which is the contract price. Criteria and their significance values not specified in the procurement documentation cannot be used for the purposes of evaluating bids.
5. The sum of the significance values of all criteria provided for in the procurement documentation is one hundred percent. The value of the significance of the criterion specified in clause 2 of part 1 of this article shall not exceed the significance of the criterion specified in clause 1 of part 1 of this article.
(see text in previous edition)
6. The sum of the values of the significance of the criteria specified in clauses 1 and 2 of part 1 of this article, when determining suppliers (contractors, performers) for the purpose of concluding contracts for performances (as a result of intellectual activity), as well as for financing the distribution or showing of a national film, for the performance of research, development or technological work must be at least twenty percent of the sum of the significance values of all criteria (except for the case provided for by Part 8 of Article 37 of this Federal Law). If, when concluding such contracts, the criterion specified in clause 2 of part 1 of this article is not used, the significance value of the criterion specified in clause 1 of part 1 of this article must be at least twenty percent of the sum of the significance values of all criteria (with the exception of the case provided for by Part 8 of Article 37 of this Federal Law). The value of the significance of the criterion specified in clause 1 of part 1 of this article, when determining the performers for the purpose of concluding a contract for the creation of a work of literature or art, may be reduced to zero percent of the sum of the values of the significance of all criteria.
(see text in previous edition)
7. The provisions of this Federal Law relating to works of literature and art shall apply to:
1) literary works;
2) dramatic and musical-dramatic works, scenario works;
3) choreographic works and pantomime;
4) musical works with or without text;
5) audiovisual works;
6) works of painting, sculpture, graphics, design, graphic stories, comics and other works of fine art;
7) works of arts and crafts and scenographic art;
8) works of architecture, urban planning and gardening art (external and internal appearance of the object, its spatial, planning and functional organization, fixed in the form of schemes or models or described in any other way, except for project documentation);
9) photographic works and works obtained by methods similar to photography;
It might be useful to read:
- Radiation: impact on humans and its consequences;
- Arts and Crafts Download Presentation on Arts and Crafts;
- Presentation on the topic "Addition and subtraction of polynomials" Addition and subtraction of polynomials presentation;
- Radiation: impact on humans and its consequences;
- Open lesson "capacitors" Energy of a charged capacitor application of capacitors presentation;
- Presentation on the topic "Nikolai Nosov "Live Hat"";
- Presentation "globe" presentation for a lesson on the world around on the topic;
- Presentation on the topic: "A walk in kindergarten;