The sinking of the battleship "Novorossiysk": five versions. "Giulio Cesare - Novorossiysk" - ship of the line Italy - Russia Giulio Cesare ship

On October 29, 1955, the battleship Novorossiysk, the flagship of the Black Sea squadron of the Soviet Navy, sank in the Northern Bay of Sevastopol.

Few people knew about this ship and its mysterious death until the end of the 80s, when they were allowed to write about it. But to this day the mystery of the death of the battleship "Novorossiysk" remains a mystery ...

"Novorossiysk" - Soviet warship, battleship of the Black Sea Fleet of the USSR Navy. Until 1948, the ship was part of the Italian Navy under the name "Giulio Cesare" ( Giulio cesare, in honor of Gaius Julius Caesar).
Dreadnought " Giulio cesare"- one of five ships of the" Conte di Cavour "( Giulio Cesare, Leonardo da Vinci, Conte di Cavour, Caio Duilio, Andrea Doria), built according to the project of engineer-general Edoardo Masdea and launched in 1910-1917.
As the main force of the Italian fleet in two world wars, they did not bring him glory without inflicting the slightest damage on the enemy. "Cavour" and "Da Vinci" were killed not in battle, but in their bases.
And "Julius Caesar" was destined to become the only battleship that the victorious country did not scrapped, did not use for experiments, but put into operation the operating fleet, and even as a flagship, despite the fact that it is clearly technically and morally obsolete ...

Giulio cesare was the second in the series, it was built by the firm "Ansaldo" (Genoa). The ship was laid down on June 24, 1910, launched on October 15, 1911, and entered service on May 14, 1914. Received the motto "To withstand any blow."
The armament consisted of 305, 120 and 76 mm guns. The ship's displacement was 25 thousand tons.

The battleship "Giulio Cesare" after modernization in 1940

"Giulio Cesare" was involved in the battles of the First and Second World Wars. After the end of World War II, The Soviet Union at the expense of reparations. At the Tehran Conference, it was decided to divide the Italian fleet between the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and the countries that suffered from fascist aggression. By lot, the British received the latest Italian battleships of the Littorio class. The USSR, to whose share the "Cesare" fell, was able to transfer it to Sevastopol only in 1949. By the order of the Black Sea Fleet of 03/05/1949, the battleship was named "Novorossiysk".

The battleship was in an extremely neglected state - it was mothballed in the port of Taranto for 5 years. Immediately before the transfer to the USSR, it underwent minor repairs (mainly of the electromechanical part). They could not translate the documentation, and the ship's mechanisms needed to be replaced. Experts noted the shortcomings of the battleship - the antediluvian level of intra-ship communications, poor survivability systems, damp cockpits with three-tiered bunks, a tiny faulty galley.
In mid-May 1949, the battleship was delivered to the Northern Dock, and a few months later she went to sea for the first time as part of the Black Sea Fleet. In subsequent years, it was constantly repaired and refitted, was in service, not meeting the requirements for many indicators of technical condition. battleship... Due to everyday difficulties, the primary repair and restoration work on the battleship was the equipment of the galley for the crew, the isolation of residential and office space under the forecastle deck, as well as the re-equipment of part of the bathrooms, washbasins and showers.
At the same time, specialists were amazed at both the elegance of the contours of the underwater part and the nature of its fouling. Only the area of ​​variable waterline was intensively overgrown with shells, and the rest, covered with a paste of unknown composition, was almost not overgrown. But the bottom-outboard fittings turned out to be in an unsatisfactory condition. Moreover, as the last commander of the BCH-5 battleship I.I.Reznikov wrote, during the next repair it was discovered that the pipelines of the fire system were almost completely overgrown with a shell throughput which decreased several times.

From 1950 to 1955, the battleship was under factory repair 7 times. However, some shortcomings were not eliminated until October 1955. Modernization work caused a small increase in ship mass(about 130 t) and deterioration of stability(the transverse metacentric height decreased by 0.03 m).

In May 1955, the Novorossiysk entered service with the Black Sea Fleet and went out to sea several times until the end of October, practicing combat training tasks.
October 28, 1955 "Novorossiysk" returned from last trip and took a place on the "battleship barrel" in the area of ​​the Marine Hospital, where the "Empress Maria" once stood ...

Before dinner, the ship was replenished with infantry soldiers transferred to the navy. At night they were placed in the bow quarters. For most of them, this was the first and last day of their naval service.
On October 29 at 01.31 a powerful explosion was heard under the hull of the bow of the ship. An emergency combat alert was declared on the ship, an alarm was also announced on the ships standing nearby. Emergency and medical teams began to arrive at Novorossiysk.
After the explosion, the bow of the ship plunged into the water, and the anchored anchor was firmly held by the battleship, not allowing it to be towed to the beach. Despite all the measures taken, water continued to flow into the ship's hull. Seeing that the flow of water could not be stopped, the acting commander Khorshudov turned to the fleet commander, Vice Admiral Parkhomenko, with a proposal to evacuate part of the team, but was refused. The evacuation order was issued too late. More than 1,000 sailors have gathered at the stern. Lifeboats began to approach the battleship, but only a small part of the crew managed to disembark on them. At 4.14 the hull of the ship suddenly jerked and began to roll to the port side and after a moment turned upside down with the keel. According to one version, Admiral Parkhomenko, not imagining the size of the hole, gave the command to be towed to the dock, and this destroyed the ship.

"Novorossiysk" overturned as rapidly as almost half a century before it "Empress Maria". Hundreds of sailors were in the water. Many, especially former infantrymen, quickly sank under the weight of wet clothes and boots. Part of the team managed to climb onto the bottom of the ship, others were picked up on boats, some managed to swim to the shore. The stress from the experience was such that some of the sailors who swam to the shore could not stand their hearts, and they immediately fell dead. Many people heard a frequent knock inside the hull of the capsized ship - this was the signal given by sailors who did not have time to get out of the compartments.

One of the divers recalled: “At night, then for a long time I dreamed of the faces of people whom I saw under water in the windows, which they were trying to open. With gestures, I made it clear that we would save. People nodded, they say, they understood ... I plunged deeper, I can hear them knocking with Morse code, - the knocking in the hearth is clearly audible: "Save quickly, we are suffocating ..." I also tapped them: "Be strong, everyone will be saved." And then it began! They started knocking in all the compartments so that they would know above that the people who were under the water were alive! Moved closer to the bow of the ship and could not believe my ears - they are singing "Varyag"! "
Through a hole cut in the aft part of the bottom, 7 people were pulled out. Two more were rescued by divers. But air began to flow out of the cut hole with increasing force, and the overturned ship began to sink slowly. In the last minutes before the death of the battleship, it was heard how the sailors, walled up in the compartments, sang "Varyag". In total, 604 people died during the explosion and sinking of the battleship, including emergency parties from other ships of the squadron.

In the summer of 1956, the EON-35 special-purpose expedition began lifting Novorossiysk. The operation was carried out in the morning of May 4 and on the same day the ascent was completed. The news of the upcoming surfacing of the battleship spread throughout Sevastopol, and, despite heavy rain, all the shores of the bay and nearby hills were strewn with people. The ship floated upward with its keel, and it was taken to the Cossack Bay, where it was turned over and hastily dismantled for scrap.

As it was then stated in the order for the fleet, the cause of the explosion of the battleship was a German magnetic mine, allegedly lying on the bottom since the war for more than 10 years, which for some reason unexpectedly came into action. Many sailors were surprised, because on this place of the bay, immediately after the war, a thorough trawling was carried out and, finally, mechanical destruction of mines in the most critical places. On the barrel itself, the ships anchored hundreds of times.

After lifting the battleship, the commission carefully examined the hole. It was monstrous in size: more than 160 square meters. m. The force of the explosion was so enormous that it was enough to pierce 8 decks - including 3 armored ones! Even the upper deck was twisted from starboard to port. It is not difficult to calculate that this would require several more than a ton of TNT. Even the largest German mines were not as powerful.

The death of "Novorosiysk" gave rise to many legends. The most popular of these is the sabotage of Italian naval saboteurs. This version was supported by the experienced naval commander Admiral Kuznetsov.

Valerio Borghese

During the war, Italian submariners were stationed in the captured Sevastopol, so that some of Borghese's associates were familiar in the Sevastopol Bay. But how could the penetration of an Italian submarine to the entrance to the main base of the fleet, 10 years after the end of the war, go unnoticed? How many flights from the submarine to the battleship did the saboteurs have to make in order to place several thousand tons of TNT on it? Maybe the charge was small and served only as a detonator for a huge mine, which the Italians placed in a secret compartment at the bottom of the battleship? Such a tightly certified compartment was discovered in 1949 by Captain 2nd Rank Lepekhov, but there was no reaction from the command to his report.

Some historians argue that the members of the commission, with the support of Khrushchev, distorted many facts of the tragedy, after which only the temporary acting commander of the Black Sea Fleet, Vice Admiral V.A. Parkhomenko and Admiral of the Fleet N.G. Kuznetsov, removed from the leadership of the Navy and demoted by two steps.
Soon after the death of "Novorossisk" flew from their posts the chief of intelligence of the Black Sea Fleet, Major General Namgaladze and the commander of the OVR (protection of the water area) Rear Admiral Galitsky.

By order of the fleet, families of the victims were given lump-sum benefits - 10 thousand rubles each. for the dead sailors and 30 thousand - for the officers. Then they tried to forget about Novorossiysk ...
Only in May 1988, the newspaper "Pravda" published for the first time a small article dedicated to the death of the battleship "Novorossiysk" with the recollections of eyewitnesses of the tragedy, which described the heroic behavior of sailors and officers who found themselves inside the capsized ship.
(from here)

After the death of Novorossiysk, various versions were put forward.

Versions about the causes of the explosion
Official version. According to the official version put forward by the government commission, the battleship was blown up by a bottom magnetic mine set by the Germans in 1944 when leaving Sevastopol. On November 17, the conclusion of the commission was presented to the Central Committee of the CPSU, which adopted and approved the conclusions. The cause of the disaster was called "an external underwater explosion (non-contact, bottom) of a charge with TNT equivalent of 1000-1200 kg." The most probable was the explosion of a German magnetic mine left on the ground after the Great Patriotic War.
However, power supplies were removed in the 50s. bottom mines turned out to be discharged, and fuses were inoperative.

Professor, Engineer-Captain 1st Rank N.P. Muru in his book Catastrophe in the Inner Roads, he proves that the most likely cause of the ship's death is the explosion of a bottom mine (two mines). N.P. Muru believes that after the catastrophe, trawling of bottom silt, 17 such mines were found, of which 3 were within a radius of 100 m from the place where the battleship was destroyed.

Opinion Y. Lepekhova, Lieutenant Engineer of the battleship Novorossiysk: the explosion was caused by German magnetic underwater mines. But at the same time, due to the nature of the destruction of the battleship's hull (the ship was pierced through and through by the explosion, and the hole in the bottom does not coincide with the hole on the deck), he believes that the mine explosion caused a detonation of the charge that was laid on the ship by the Italians even before it was transferred to the Soviet side. Lepekhov claims that when, during acceptance, he and other members of the commission examined the ship, they buried themselves in a deaf bulkhead in the bow of the battleship. Then they did not attach importance to this, but now Lepekhov believes that there was a powerful explosive charge behind this bulkhead. This charge should have been activated some time after the transfer of the ship, but for some reason this did not happen. But already in 1955, this charge detonated, serving as the main reason for the death of the ship.

In a number of later studies of the destruction of the battleship, it was shown that to cause the destruction that Novorossiysk received - through penetration of the hull from the keel to the upper deck, it would take about 2-5 tons of TNT, if the charges were placed directly at the bottom of the hull, or 12, 5 tons of TNT, when the charges were placed on the bottom, under the battleship, at a depth of 17.5 m. damage to the battleship when it explodes on the ground. In this case, only the first and second bottoms of the battleship would have been pierced, which is confirmed by experimental data. In the area of ​​the explosion, a search for mine fragments was undertaken, the silt was washed, but nothing was found.

Explosion of ship ammunition... This version disappeared after an examination of the hull: the nature of the destruction indicated that an explosion had occurred. outside.

Meeting in Sevastopol in September 1955... There is a version that the ship was deliberately blown up during a discussion about the directions of the fleet's development. We will come back to this version ...

Sabotage... The commission's conclusions did not exclude the possibility of sabotage. On the eve of the transfer of the battleship to the USSR, there were open calls in Italy to prevent the pride of the Italian fleet from falling under the Soviet flag. Some bloggers claim that it was planned to prepare the 320-mm main caliber of the Novorossiysk for firing shells with nuclear filling. As if, just on the eve of the battleship, after long setbacks, it was as if it were fired by experimental special shells (without a nuclear charge) at training targets.

In the mid-2000s. magazine "Itogi", published the story of a certain submarine officer Nikolo, allegedly involved in the sabotage. According to him, the operation was organized by the former commander of the flotilla of submarine saboteurs V. Borghese, after handing over the ship, vowing "to take revenge on the Russians and blow it up at all costs." The sabotage group arrived in a mini-submarine, which was secretly delivered by a cargo steamer arriving from Italy. The Italians allegedly set up a secret base in the Sevastopol Omega Bay area, mined the battleship, and then went on a submarine to the open sea and waited for their "own" steamer to pick them up.

And in 2013, a veteran of the Italian division of combat swimmers "Gamma" Hugo D'Esposito stated that the Italian military was involved in the sinking of the Soviet battleship "Novorossiysk". 4Arts writes about this, noting that the words of Hugo d "Esposito" are the first admission of involvement in the destruction of Novorossiysk by the Italian military, who had previously categorically denied such a version. : "It directly confirms the likely hypothesis about the cause of the explosion on the ship."
According to Hugo D'Esposito, the Italians did not want the "Russians" to get the ship, so they made sure to sink it: "They did everything possible." But he did not specify exactly how the sabotage was carried out.

Strange story. Believe it or not?

Earlier, the version that "Novorossiysk" sank as a result of sabotage organized by the Italians was not officially confirmed.

Reference:

Prince Junio ​​Valerio Scipione Borghese(ital. Junio ​​Valerio Scipione Ghezzo Marcantonio Maria dei principi Borghese; 06/06/1906, Rome - 08/26/1974, Cadiz) - Italian military and political leader, captain of the 2nd rank (Italian. capitano di fregata).
Born into an aristocratic Borghese family. In 1928 Borghese graduated from the Naval Academy in Livorno and joined the submarine fleet.
An interesting detail: in 1931 Borghese married a Russian countess Daria Vasilievna Olsufieva(1909-1963), with whom he had four children and who died tragically in a car accident in 1962. Her name bears the prize for connoisseurs of Rome.

Since 1933 Borghese is a submarine commander, has carried out a number of successful operations, sank the Allied ships with a total displacement of 75 thousand tons. Received the nickname "Black Prince". He initiated the creation of a unit in the X flotilla that used combat swimmers. Since 1941, as acting, since 1943 he officially commanded the X Flotilla, which became the most successful formation of the Italian Navy.

10-flotilla of assault vehicles ( Decima Flottiglia MAS) - a detachment of naval saboteurs in the Italian Navy, created in 1941. It consisted of a surface unit (boats with explosives) and an underwater unit (guided torpedoes). He also had a special unit "Gamma", which included combat swimmers. The unit was originally part of the 1st IAS flotilla, then received the name "Tenth IAS Flotilla". MAS is an abbreviation for Italian. Mezzi d "Assalto- assault equipment; or ital. Motoscafo Armato Silurante- armed torpedo boats.

The SLC guided torpedo, which was called the "piggy" in the 10th flotilla, was essentially a small boat capable of diving to shallow depths. Dimensions - 6.7 m long and 53 cm wide. Thanks to the tanks for ballast and compressed air, the torpedo could submerge to a depth of 30 m. Two propellers were driven by an electric motor powered by a battery. The torpedo developed a speed of three knots (5.5 km / h) and had a cruising range of 10 nautical miles (18.5 km).

The torpedo was delivered to the scene of hostilities on an ordinary submarine. Then two saboteurs sat on her astride one after the other, like on a horse. The pilot and the torpedo commander were sitting on it. They were protected from the shock of waves by a glass shield, and at the base of the shield there were onboard instruments: a magnetic compass, a depth gauge, a roll gauge, a steering lever, engine and pump switches that held the torpedo at the desired depth.
A mechanic diver sat behind the pilot. With his back he was leaning against a container with tools (a cutter for locking nets, a spare oxygen device, ropes and clamps for fixing an explosive charge). The crew was dressed in light spacesuits and used an oxygen breathing apparatus. The oxygen cylinders were enough for 6 hours.
Having sailed up to the enemy's ship to the maximum near distance, the torpedo sank, and the diver fixed the 300 kg explosive charge brought with him to the hull of the ship. Having installed the clockwork, the swimmers boarded the torpedo and returned to base.

At first there were setbacks: the "pigs" drowned, they were destroyed, caught in the nets, the crew was poisoned and suffocated because of the imperfect air supply system, torpedoes were simply lost at sea, and so on. But then the "pigs" began to make progress: on the night of November 18-19, 1941, "live torpedoes" sank two British ships - Queen Elizabeth and Valiant: "The Italians won one of the most brilliant victories in the history of naval wars. 6 people were seriously injured. 2 battleships in a strictly guarded port ".
(from here)

Nuance: the practice of underwater saboteurs, both English and Italian, during the Second World War did not involve hanging such large charges under the ship's hull as in Sevastopol.
Italian submarine saboteurs on guided torpedoes ("Maiale") suspended a charge under the bottom weighing only about 300 Kg... So they acted, carrying out sabotage in Alexandria on 19.12.1941, damaging 2 British ships of the line ("Queen Elizabeth" and "Veliente") and in Gibraltar in 1941-1943.
The charges were suspended for lateral keels ships using special clamps called "sergeants".
Note that there were no side keels on the battleship Novorossiysk in the area of ​​the explosion (30-50 frames).

Another sabotage version: installation under the bottom of the battleship magnetic mines... But you had to have about hundreds underwater saboteurs-swimmers carrying a magnetic mine underwater to create a charge under the bottom about 2 t.... For example, Italian divers from the "Gamma squad", which is part of the 10th IAS flotilla, during sabotage during the Second World War, transported charges of the "Minyatta" or "Bauletti" type with a total weight no more than 12 kg.

Should I believe Signor Hugo D'Esposito? It still seems to me not entirely clear how Did the Italian swimmers manage to penetrate the Sevastopol bay, and most importantly, deliver a bunch of explosives to the place of sabotage? Maybe the former saboteur still lied?

From the "Information on the regime in the area of ​​the Main Base from October 29, 1955", it follows that during October 27-28, 1955, the following foreign ships were on the transition in the Black Sea:
- Italian "Gerosi" and "Ferdinando" from Odessa to the Bosphorus;
- Italian "Esmeraldo" and French "Sanche Kondo" from Novorossiysk to the Bosphorus;
- French "Roland" from Poti to the Bosphorus;
- Turkish "Demirkalla" from the Bosphorus to Sulina.
All ships were at a considerable distance from the main base ...

The submarine saboteurs were also supposed to have complete information about the security regime of the Main Base of the Black Sea Fleet, the places of anchorage and exit of ships. They should have known that the boom gates to the Sevastopol Bay would be open, that the battleship, returning from the sea on October 28, 1955, would stand on barrels No. 3, and not in its regular place - barrels No. 14 in the very depths of the bay.
Such information could be collected only by an intelligence resident located in Sevastopol, and it was possible to transmit a "signal" to saboteurs on the submarine only by radio communication. But the presence of such a resident in closed (1939-1959) Sevastopol and his possible actions in the interests of Prince Borghese seem unrealistic.
And he could not get information about which barrels the battleship would stand on. it was transferred to "Novorossiysk" when it was already at the Inkerman sections immediately in front of the entrance to the base.

The question is:
- where set saboteurs mines in "magnetic cylinders" if the battleship was at sea all day on October 28?
- how they could finish all work on October 28 by “sunset” and even “sail” back to Omega, if the sun set on October 28, 1955 in the Sevastopol region at 17.17 (it got dark at 18.47), and the battleship Novorossiysk by the time of sunset did not finish mooring ”? He anchored and barrels on 10/28/1955 only in 17.30 !

Let's say the saboteurs managed to set mines. Taking into account their two-fold return and the possible weight of explosive charges (for example, the Miniatta type - 2 kg, the Bauletti type - 4.5 kg, which were used by Italian saboteurs, and each swimmer wore 4-5 such mines on his belt), they could install a charge weighing a maximum of 540 kg under the bottom of the battleship. This is clearly not enough to inflict the damage that the battleship received. Note also that the Minyatta mine was attached to the underwater part of the ship by suction, while the Bauletti mine was attached to the side keel of the ship with two clamps, i.e. these were not magnetic mines. There were no side keels on the Novorossiysk in the area of ​​the explosion. Assume that magnetic mines were specially made? But why, if the Italians had mines already tested in real business?

The opinion of the former Italian submarine saboteurs.
A.N. Norchenko met with these people in 1995 in Italy, and described these meetings in his book "The Cursed Secret":
- Luigi Ferraro, an underwater saboteur who served in the squadron of underwater swimmers ("squadron Gamma"), who blew up several ships during the war, a national hero of Italy, holder of the Great Gold Medal for Military Valor.
- Evelino Marcolini, in the past a saboteur-torpedoist, during the war participated in an operation against the British aircraft carrier "Aquila", for which he was awarded the Great Gold Medal for military valor.
- Emilio Legnani, began his service as a young officer on the battleship "Giulio Cesare", after the war went to Malta on it, a former saboteur boatman who served in the torpedo boats 10 IAS flotillas. During the war, he visited Gurzuf, Balaklava, Sevastopol. After the war, in 1949, he commanded a detachment of ships, ensuring the safety of a group of ships, which were assigned to the USSR for reparations and went to Albania, where their transfer took place. This detachment of ships was responsible for the safety of the group of ships transferred all the way to the Albanian shores.
All of them were intimately acquainted with the prince Borghese. All of them were awarded, but for their military actions during the war.

Answers to questions about the involvement of Italian saboteurs in the explosion of the battleship "Novorossiysk":
L. Ferrari:
“This question is not new to us. It has already been asked to us in various letters. Everyone asked if we blew up the Giulio Cesare in Sevastopol? I speak responsibly and definitely: these are all fictions. At that time, our country was in ruins, there were enough of its own problems! .. And why do we need all this? This is a distant story. I would admit my participation without any problems, but I do not want to invent something that did not exist.
... I am 95 percent unable to imagine who, except Italians, could do it. But I am 100 percent sure that these are not Italians. We had both equipment and trained people. It seems like there is no one besides us, many people think so. But we have nothing to do with this act. This is absolutely certain. He was of no use to us. And in general, you know, Señor Alessandro, if I had blown up the Giulio Cesare in combat conditions, I would have reported this to you with pride. But I don't want to ascribe it to myself ".

E. Marcolini:
“We are all aware of the fact that more than a ton of explosives were detonated under the battleship. I could have delivered no more than 280 kilograms in my "Mayala" (a guided torpedo driven by E. Marcolini during the war). To deliver our charge to the battleship, we would need support equipment: either a submarine or something like the Olterra. And so that they are not far away. Because there would be practically no power reserve for the return: the torpedo would then have to be drowned, and we ourselves would have to get out just like that.
And this is physically impossible in a little-known place. And even in a matter of minutes ...
There is nothing to say about the swimmers from Gamma. They wouldn't last long in your water.(the water temperature on 10/28/1955 in the Sevastopol region was 12-14 degrees). So I have no idea how I would have done it myself. And why did we need it? ..
If we had actually taken part in the bombing of Giulio Cesare, then it would have immediately become known to everyone, and then we would have been dealt with very quickly, they would have been torn to pieces. And first of all, our leftists, they were then very powerful in Italy. "

E. Legnani answers questions, including about the oath of Prince Borghese on his golden sword to drown the battleship, but not let him serve with the Bolsheviks:
“It's all fantasy. The prince, as far as I knew him, did not take any such oaths to anyone. And we all had the same swords. And in general, why should we Italians take the risk to blow up this rusty box, which barely floated and could hardly shoot ?! I personally know this better than anyone else. Because of him, there was nothing to risk, let him swim and ruin your treasury ... And if anyone had to take revenge, it was England and America - they took from us completely new battleships "Vittorio Veneto" and "Italy", and the Germans bombed "Roma" on the day of the armistice. So from any side this action with Giulio Cesare in Italy was absolutely unnecessary ... The guilty and interested should be looked for elsewhere. "

The answer is somewhat cynical, but frank.
All these interlocutors advised: determine, who needed all this and was profitable.
Hmmm. It seems that Hugo D'Esposito just decided to brag in his old age.

As for the version about the involvement of British underwater swimmers-saboteurs in the bombing of Novorossiysk, their problems would be the same as those pointed out when analyzing the version about the “Italian trace”. Besides, no English ships that could deliver underwater saboteurs or an ultra-small submarine were not observed in the Black Sea at that time.

But if not sabotage of combat swimmers, then what caused the death of the battleship?
The analysis of the versions was carried out in his research by A.D. Sanin ( Once again about the "cursed secret" and various versions of the sinking of the battleship "Novorossiysk").
Interestingly, in the area of ​​the explosion, "A torn part of a barge with a winch, 8-9 m long, 4 m wide, protruding from the ground by 2.5-4 m.", that is, to the bottom of the battleship. It was quite possible to place explosive charges on the barge with a total mass of 2-2.5 tons and more. At the same time, the explosion becomes no longer bottom, but bottom and practically under the very bottom of the battleship (3-5 m remains to the bottom). "Iron sheet without fouling" of dimensions 4x2 m, 20 mm thick could be used for better shielding of charges from the bottom and imparting an upward directed explosion to the explosion. As you can easily calculate, the weight of this sheet is about 1.2 t.
To deliver such a quantity of explosives (more than 2 tons) to a barge under water and to drag a sheet of iron to it, of such dimensions and weight, is clearly beyond the power of underwater saboteurs ... Hence the conclusion that such an operation, if it was carried out, was carried out surface path followed by the sinking of this rusty barge in the area of ​​anchorage number 3.
A.N. Norchenko, comparing the documents on the explosion of the battleship and various objects found at the bottom of the funnel in the area of ​​its parking on barrels No. 3, gives a possible scheme for installing charges under the battleship "Novorossiysk": the first charge detonation occurred closer to the left side of the battleship. The cavity he created in the water accumulated the energy of the explosion of the second charge and gave it a more directional character. The insignificant depth and smoothness of the craters just indicate that the explosions occurred at a certain distance from the ground, equal to the height of the flooded barge, i.e., bottom directed explosions were realized.

The proposed scheme (reconstruction) of the installation of the charge of the LK "Novorossiysk" using a flooded barge

Fragment of the map of the LK "Novorossiysk" parking lot on barrels No. 3

The second sabotage version (O. Sergeev) of the explosion may be associated with the disappearance after the explosion of the regular battleship longboat No. 319 and the command boat No. 1475, standing under the shot, from the starboard side of the battleship at a distance of 10-15 m from the side.
From the explanatory note of the assistant commander of the battleship captain 3rd rank Serbulov dated 30.10.55:
“... Hearing the explosion, in 2-3 minutes I went to the poop. Following to the place of the explosion, from the waist I saw people floating ... and there I discovered that under the right-hand shot there was neither boat # 1475 nor longboat # 319. "
The commission also did not attach any importance to the fact of the disappearance of the boat and the launch, although all the first reports of the explosion were associated with the fact that some gasoline containers had exploded.
From the explanatory note of the Fleet Commander Parkhomenko, presented by him to the commission: "... At about 01.40, Captain of the 3rd rank Ksenofontov called me at the apartment of the OD of the Fleet and reported that at 01.30 petrol tanks had exploded on the battleship Novorossiysk."
But there was no gasoline in the bow of the battleship, gasoline was in the boat # 1475. A completely logical conclusion suggests itself that the traceless destruction of the boat and the launch could have occurred during underwater explosions of charges and the resulting explosion of the gas-air mixture. This led to the smell of gasoline and the first report of the explosion of a gasoline tank.

The explosive charges could possibly have been placed on longboat No. 319, whose displacement is about 12 tons, the length is 12 m, the width is 3.4 m, the side height is 1.27 m. It could accommodate charges weighing up to 2.5 tons and more (for example, 2 FAB-1000 air bombs), as well as a “sheet of iron without fouling” weighing 1.2 tons to give the explosions an upward direction.
If longboat No. 319, during the battleship's departure to the sea on October 28, 1955, did not climb aboard it, but remained at the battleship's boat base in the Sevastopol Bay, then it could well have been "charged" with so many explosives in advance, and then simply sunk at the side battleship.

O. Sergeev believes that the battleship was blown up by two charges with a total TNT equivalent in the range of 1800 kg, installed on the ground in the area of ​​the bow artillery cellars, at an insignificant distance from the center plane of the ship and from each other. The explosions occurred with a short time interval, causing the creation of a cumulative effect and causing damage, as a result of which the ship sank. The bombing was prepared and carried out by the domestic special services with the knowledge of the country's leadership for internal political purposes. Who was this provocation directed against? According to Sergeev, against the leadership of the Navy. The death of "Novorossiysk" was the beginning of a large-scale reduction of the Soviet Navy. Outdated battleships Sevastopol, October Revolution, captured cruisers Kerch, Admiral Makarov, many captured submarines, destroyers and ships of other classes of pre-war construction were used for scrap metal.

Hmmm. It turns out that they did blow up their? For the GRU or the KGB, this was clearly easier than for foreign swimmers, who simply did not physically have such an opportunity.

It is strange that for decades, experts have not been able to establish the cause of the death of the battleship.

And another mystery: 40 years before the explosion of the flagship battleship of the Soviet fleet on the same Sevastopol raid and under the same unexplained circumstances, the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, the dreadnought "Empress Maria", died ...

Eternal memory to the lost sailors.

August 22nd, 2013

On October 29, 1955, the battleship Novorossiysk, the flagship of the Black Sea squadron of the Soviet Navy, sank in the Northern Bay of Sevastopol. More than 600 sailors were killed. According to the official version, an old German bottom mine exploded under the bottom of the ship. But there are other versions, unofficial, but very popular - allegedly Italian, British and even Soviet saboteurs are responsible for the death of Novorossiysk.

At the time of its sinking, the battleship "Novorossiysk" was 44 years old - a venerable time for a ship. For most of its life, the battleship bore a different name - "Giulio Cesare" ("Julius Caesar"), sailing under the flag of the Italian Navy. It was laid down in Genoa in the summer of 1910 and launched in 1915. The battleship did not take part in the First World War; in the 1920s, it was used as a training ship for training naval gunners.

In the mid-1930s, the Giulio Cesare underwent a major overhaul. The ship's displacement reached 24,000 tons, it could develop enough high speed at 22 knots. The battleship was well armed: two three-barreled and three turret guns, three torpedo tubes, anti-aircraft guns and heavy machine guns. During World War II, the battleship was mainly engaged in escorting convoys, but in 1942 the naval command recognized it as obsolete and transferred it to the category of training ships.

In 1943 Italy surrendered. Until 1948, the Giulio Cesare was parked without being mothballed, with a minimum crew and no proper maintenance.

According to a special agreement, the Italian fleet was to be divided among the allies in the anti-Hitler coalition. The ship of the line fell to the share of the USSR, light cruiser, 9 destroyers and 4 submarines, not counting small ships. On January 10, 1947, in the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Allied Powers, an agreement was reached on the distribution of the transferred Italian ships between the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and other countries that suffered from the Italian aggression. For example, France was allocated four cruisers, four destroyers and two submarines, and Greece - one cruiser. The battleships became part of Groups A, B and C, intended for the three main powers.

The Soviet side laid claim to one of the two new battleships, superior in power even to the German ships of the Bismarck class. But since by this time the Cold War had already begun between the recent allies, neither the United States nor Britain sought to strengthen the Soviet Navy with powerful ships. I had to throw lots, and the USSR got the group "C". The new battleships went to the United States and England (later these battleships were returned to Italy as part of the NATO partnership). By decision of the Triple Commission in 1948, the USSR received the battleship Giulio Cesare, the light cruiser Emmanuele Filiberto Duca D'Aosta, the destroyers Artilieri, Fuchillera, the destroyers Animoso, Ardimentozo, Fortunale and submarines Marea ”and“ Nicelio ”.

On December 9, 1948, the Giulio Cesare left the port of Taranto and arrived at the Albanian port of Vlora on December 15. On February 3, 1949, the transfer of the battleship to the Soviet commission headed by Rear Admiral Levchenko took place in this port. On February 6, the USSR naval flag was raised over the ship, and two weeks later it left for Sevastopol, arriving at its new base on February 26. By order of the Black Sea Fleet of March 5, 1949, the battleship was named Novorossiysk.

"Novorossiysk"

As noted by almost all researchers, the ship was handed over by the Italians to Soviet sailors in a state of disrepair. The main part of the armament, the main power plant and the main hull structures - the skin, the set, the main transverse bulkheads below the armored deck were in relatively satisfactory form. But general ship systems: pipelines, fittings, servicing mechanisms - required serious repair or replacement. There were no radar equipment on the ship at all, the radio communication equipment park was scarce, and small-caliber anti-aircraft artillery was completely absent. It should be noted that immediately before the transfer to the USSR, the battleship underwent minor repairs, mainly related to the electromechanical part.

When "Novorossiysk" settled in Sevastopol, the command of the Black Sea Fleet gave the order - in as soon as possible turn the ship into a full-fledged combat unit. The matter was complicated by the fact that some of the documentation was missing, and there were practically no naval specialists who spoke Italian in the USSR.

In August 1949, "Novorossiysk" took part in the squadron's maneuvers as a flagship. However, his participation was rather nominal, since they did not have time to put the battleship in order in the three months released (and could not have time). However, the political situation demanded to demonstrate the success of Soviet sailors in the development of Italian ships. As a result, the squadron went to sea, and NATO intelligence made sure that the Novorossiysk was floating.

From 1949 to 1955, the battleship was under factory repair eight times. It was equipped with 24 paired installations of Soviet 37-mm anti-aircraft guns, new radar stations, radio communications and intra-ship communications. Also, the Italian turbines were replaced with new ones manufactured at the Kharkov plant. In May 1955, "Novorossiysk" entered service in the Black Sea Fleet and until the end of October several times went to sea, fulfilling combat training tasks.

On October 28, 1955, the battleship returned from the last cruise and took a place in the Northern Bay on a "battleship barrel" in the area of ​​the Marine Hospital, about 110 meters from the coast. The water depth there was 17 meters of water and about 30 meters of viscous silt.

Explosion

At the time of the explosion, the battleship commander, Captain 1st Rank Kukhta, was on vacation. His duties were performed by the senior mate captain of the 2nd rank Khurshudov. According to staffing table, on the battleship there were 68 officers, 243 petty officers, 1231 sailors. After the "Novorossiysk" moored, part of the crew went on leave. More than one and a half thousand people remained on board: part of the crew and a new replenishment (200 people), cadets of naval schools and soldiers who had arrived on the battleship the day before.

On October 29, at 01:31 Moscow time, a powerful explosion was heard in the bow from the starboard side of the ship's hull. According to experts, its force was equivalent to an explosion of 1000-1200 kilograms of TNT. On the starboard side in the underwater part of the hull there was a hole with an area of ​​more than 150 square meters, and on the left side and along the keel - a dent with a deflection arrow from 2 to 3 meters. The total damage area of ​​the underwater part of the hull was about 340 square meters on a 22-meter long section. Outboard water poured into the resulting hole, and after 3 minutes there was a trim of 3-4 degrees and a roll of 1-2 degrees to the starboard side.

At 01:40, the incident was reported to the fleet commander. By 02:00, when the list to starboard reached 1.5 degrees, the chief operational management Fleet Captain 1st Rank Ovcharov ordered to "tow the ship to a shallow place," and the approaching tugs turned it stern to the shore.

By this time, the commander of the Black Sea Fleet, Vice Admiral V.A. Parkhomenko, Chief of Staff of the Fleet Vice Admiral S.E. Chursin, member of the Military Council, Vice Admiral N.M. Kulakov, Acting Squadron Commander Rear Admiral N I. Nikolsky, Chief of Staff of the squadron Rear Admiral A. I. Zubkov, Commander of the cruiser division Rear Admiral S. M. Lobov, Head of the Fleet Political Directorate Rear Admiral B. T. Kalachev and 28 other senior staff officers.

At 02:32 a roll to the left side was revealed. By 03:30, about 800 unoccupied sailors were lined up on the deck, and rescue ships were stationed at the side of the battleship. Nikolsky offered to transfer the sailors to them, but Parkhomenko received a categorical refusal. At 03:50 the roll to the left side reached 10-12 degrees, while the tugs continued to pull the battleship to the left. After 10 minutes, the roll increased to 17 degrees, while the critical ones were 20. Nikolsky again asked Parkhomenko and Kulakov for permission to evacuate the sailors who were not engaged in the fight for survivability and was again refused.

"Novorossiysk" began to overturn upside down. Several dozen people managed to get into the boats and neighboring ships, but hundreds of sailors fell from the deck into the water. Many remained inside the dying battleship. As Admiral Parkhomenko later explained, he "did not consider it possible to order the personnel to leave the ship in advance, because until the last minutes he hoped that the ship would be saved, and there was no thought that it would perish." This hope cost the lives of hundreds of people who, falling into the water, were covered by the battleship's hull.

By 04:14 "Novorossiysk", having received more than 7 thousand tons of water, banked to a fatal 20 degrees, swung to the right, just as unexpectedly fell to the left and lay on board. In this position, he remained for several hours, resting against solid ground with masts. At 22:00 on October 29, the hull completely disappeared under water.

In total, 609 people died in the crash, including emergency parties from other ships of the squadron. Directly as a result of the explosion and flooding of the bow compartments, from 50 to 100 people died. The rest died during the capsizing of the battleship and after it. Timely evacuation of personnel was not organized. Most of the sailors remained inside the hull. Some of them were kept in the air cushions of the compartments for a long time, but only nine people were saved: seven came out through the neck cut in the aft part of the bottom five hours after capsizing, and two more were taken out 50 hours later by divers. According to the recollections of the divers, the seamen, walled up and doomed to death, sang "Varyag". Only by November 1 did the divers stop hearing knocks.

In the summer of 1956, the EON-35 special-purpose expedition began lifting the battleship using the blowing method. Preparations for the ascent were fully completed by the end of April 1957. General purging began on the morning of May 4 and completed the ascent on the same day. The ship floated up keel on May 4, 1957, and on May 14 it was taken to the Cossack Bay, where it was turned over. During the rise of the ship, the third tower of the main caliber fell out, which had to be raised separately. The ship was dismantled for metal and transferred to the Zaporizhstal plant.

Commission conclusions

To clarify the causes of the explosion, a government commission was created, headed by the Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Minister of the Shipbuilding Industry, Colonel-General of the Engineering and Technical Service Vyacheslav Malyshev. According to the memoirs of everyone who knew him, Malyshev was an engineer of the highest erudition. He perfectly knew his business and read theoretical drawings of any complexity, well versed in issues of unsinkability and stability of ships. Back in 1946, having familiarized himself with the drawings of "Giulio Cesare", Malyshev recommended that this acquisition be abandoned. But he could not persuade Stalin to change his mind.

The commission gave its conclusion two and a half weeks after the disaster. Tight deadlines were set in Moscow. On November 17, the conclusion of the commission was presented to the Central Committee of the CPSU, which adopted and approved the conclusions.

The cause of the disaster was called "an external underwater explosion (non-contact, bottom) charge with TNT equivalent of 1000-1200 kg." The most probable was the explosion of a German magnetic mine left on the ground after the Great Patriotic War.

As for responsibility, the direct culprits of the death of a significant number of people and the battleship "Novorossiysk" were named the commander of the Black Sea Fleet, Vice Admiral Parkhomenko, acting. squadron commander Rear Admiral Nikolsky and acting battleship commander Captain 2nd Rank Khurshudov. The commission noted that Vice Admiral Kulakov, a member of the Military Council of the Black Sea Fleet, also bears direct responsibility for the disaster with the battleship Novorossiysk and especially for the death of people.

But despite the harsh conclusions, the matter was limited to the fact that the battleship commander Kukhta was demoted and sent to the reserve. They were also removed from office and demoted in rank: the commander of the division for the protection of the water area, Rear Admiral Galitsky, acting. squadron commander Nikolsky and member of the Military Council Kulakov. After a year and a half, they were reinstated in ranks. The fleet commander, Vice Admiral Viktor Parkhomenko, was severely reprimanded, and on December 8, 1955, he was removed from office. No judicial action was taken against him. In 1956, the commander of the Soviet Navy, Admiral N.G. Kuznetsov, was removed from his post.

The commission also noted that “the sailors, foremen and officers, as well as the officers who were in charge of the direct struggle to save the ship, - acting. commander of warhead-5 t. Matusevich, commander of the survivability division t. Gorodetsky and the chief who helped them technical management Fleet, Comrade Ivanov skillfully and selflessly fought the water coming to the ship, knew every job well, showed initiative, showed examples of courage and genuine heroism. But all the efforts of the personnel were devalued and nullified by the criminally frivolous, unskilled and indecisive command ... "

In the documents of the commission, it was said in detail about those who were supposed to, but did not manage to organize the rescue of the crew and the ship. However, none of these documents gave a direct answer to the main question: what caused the disaster?

Version number 1 - mine

The initial versions - the explosion of a gas depot or artillery cellars - were swept away almost immediately. The tanks of the gas depot on the battleship were empty long before the disaster. As for the cellars, if they dashed, there would be little left of the battleship, and five cruisers standing nearby would also take off into the air. In addition, this version was immediately overturned by the testimony of sailors, whose place of combat service was the 2nd tower of the main artillery caliber, in the area of ​​which the battleship received a hole. It was accurately determined that the 320mm shells remained intact.

There are still several versions left: a mine explosion, a submarine torpedo attack and sabotage. After studying the circumstances, the mine version gained the most votes. Which was quite understandable - mines in the Sevastopol bays were not uncommon since the Civil War. The bays and roads were periodically cleared of mines with the help of minesweepers and diving teams. In 1941, when the German armies attacked Sevastopol, the German Air Force and Navy mined the water area both from the sea and from the air - mines different types and the designation was set by them several hundred. Some worked during the fighting, others were removed and neutralized after the liberation of Sevastopol in 1944. Later, the Sevastopol bays and roadstead were regularly swept and inspected by diving teams. The last such comprehensive survey was carried out in 1951-1953. In 1956-1958, after the explosion of the battleship, 19 more German bottom mines were found in the Sevastopol Bay, including three - at a distance of less than 50 meters from the place where the battleship was destroyed.

The testimony of divers also spoke in favor of the mine version. As the squad leader Kravtsov testified: “The ends of the casing of the hole are bent inward. By the nature of the hole, burrs from the casing, the explosion was from the outside of the ship. "

Version number 2 - torpedo attack

The next was the version of the torpedoing of the battleship by an unknown submarine. However, when studying the nature of the damage received by the battleship, the commission did not find characteristic signs corresponding to a torpedo strike. But she found something else. At the time of the explosion, the ships of the water area guard division, whose duty was to guard the entrance to the main base of the Black Sea Fleet, were in a completely different place. On the night of the disaster, the outer raid was not guarded by anyone; the network gates were thrown open, and the direction-finders were inactive. Thus, Sevastopol was defenseless. And, theoretically, a foreign submarine could well enter the bay, choose a position and deliver a torpedo strike.

In practice, the boat would hardly have had enough depth for a full-fledged attack. However, the military knew that small or dwarf submarines were already in service with some Western fleets. So, theoretically, a dwarf submarine could penetrate the inner raid of the main base of the Black Sea Fleet. This assumption, in turn, gave rise to another - were the saboteurs involved in the explosion?

Version number 3 - Italian frogmen

This version was supported by the fact that before going under the red flag "Novorossiysk" was an Italian ship. And the most formidable submarine special forces during the Second World War, the "10th Assault Flotilla", was with the Italians, and was commanded by Prince Junio ​​Valerio Borghese, a staunch anti-communist who allegedly publicly vowed after the transfer of the battleship to the USSR to avenge such humiliation of Italy.

Valerio Borghese, a graduate of the Royal Naval Academy, had a brilliant career as a submarine officer, which was facilitated by a noble background and excellent academic performance. The first submarine under the command of Borghese was part of the Italian legion, which, as part of Franco's assistance, operated against the Republican fleet of Spain. After that, the prince received a new submarine under his command. Later Valerio Borghese took a special training course in Germany on the Baltic Sea.

Upon his return to Italy, Borghese received the most modern submarine Shire under his command. Thanks to the skillful actions of the commander, the submarine returned back to its base unharmed from each combat campaign. The operations of the Italian submariners aroused genuine interest in King Victor Emmanuel, who granted the prince-submariner a personal audience.

After that, Borghese was asked to create the world's first flotilla of sea saboteurs-submariners. For her were created midget submarines, special guided torpedoes, manned exploding boats. On December 18, 1941, Italians secretly entered the harbor of Alexandria in dwarf submarines and attached magnetic explosive devices to the bottoms of the British battleships Valiant and Queen Elizabeth. The death of these ships allowed the Italian fleet to seize the initiative in the fighting in the Mediterranean for a long time. Also, the "10th assault flotilla" took part in the siege of Sevastopol, based in the ports of the Crimea.

Theoretically, a foreign submarine could deliver combat swimmers as close as possible to Sevastopol so that they could sabotage. Taking into account the combat potential of first-class Italian scuba divers, pilots of small submarines and guided torpedoes, and also taking into account the slovenliness in matters of guarding the main base of the Black Sea Fleet, the version about underwater saboteurs looks convincing.

Version 4 - British saboteurs

The second division of the world capable of such a sabotage was the 12th Flotilla of the British Navy. It was commanded at that time by Captain 2nd Rank Lionel Crabbe, also a man of legend. During the Second World War, he led the defense of the British naval base Gibraltar from Italian combat swimmers and was rightfully considered one of the best submarine saboteurs of the British fleet. Crabbe personally knew many Italians from the 10th Flotilla. In addition, after the war, captured Italian combat swimmers consulted specialists from the 12th flotilla.

The following argument is put forward in favor of this version - as if the Soviet command wanted to equip Novorossiysk with nuclear weapons. The USSR possessed an atomic bomb since 1949, but there were no naval means of using nuclear weapons at that time. The solution could only be large-caliber naval cannons, firing heavy shells over long distances. The Italian battleship was ideal for this purpose. Great Britain, which is an island, in this case turned out to be the most vulnerable target for the Soviet navy. In the case of the use of atomic explosive devices near the west coast of England, taking into account the wind rose that blows to the east in those parts all year round, the whole country would be exposed to radiation.

And one more fact - at the end of October 1955, the British Mediterranean squadron conducted maneuvers in the Aegean and Marmara Seas.

Version 5 - the handiwork of the KGB

Already in our time, Candidate of Technical Sciences Oleg Sergeev put forward another version. The battleship "Novorossiysk" was blown up by two charges with a total TNT equivalent within 1800 kg, installed on the ground in the area of ​​the bow artillery cellars, at an insignificant distance from the center plane of the ship and from each other. The explosions occurred with a short time interval, causing the creation of a cumulative effect and causing damage, as a result of which the ship sank. The bombing was prepared and carried out by the domestic special services with the knowledge of the country's leadership exclusively for domestic political purposes. In 1993, the perpetrators of this action became known: a senior lieutenant of the special forces and two warrant officers - a support group.

Who was this provocation directed against? According to Sergeev, primarily against the leadership of the Navy. Nikita Khrushchev answered this question two years after the destruction of Novorossiysk, at the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU on October 29, 1957: “We were offered to invest over 100 billion rubles in the fleet and build old boats and destroyers armed with classical artillery. We had a great fight, removed Kuznetsov ... to think, take care of the fleet, he was unable to defend himself. You need to evaluate everything in a new way. It is necessary to build a fleet, but above all to build a submarine fleet armed with missiles. "

The ten-year shipbuilding plan, which does not reflect in the future the priority of developing the most capital-intensive and profitable for the military-industrial complex, naval strategic nuclear forces, objectively could not be supported by the country's military-political leadership, which decided the fate of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy Nikolai Kuznetsov.

The death of "Novorossiysk" was the beginning of a large-scale reduction of the Soviet Navy. Outdated battleships Sevastopol and October Revolution, captured cruisers Kerch and Admiral Makarov, many captured submarines, destroyers and ships of other classes of pre-war construction were used for scrap metal.

Criticism of versions

Critics of the mine version claim that by 1955, the power supplies of all bottom mines would inevitably be discharged, and the fuses became completely unusable. Until now, there have not been and there are no batteries capable of not being discharged for ten or more years. It is also noted that the explosion occurred after 8 hours of mooring of the battleship, and all German mines had hourly intervals, multiples of only 6 hours. Before the tragedy, barrel No. 3 moored "Novorossiysk" (10 times) and the battleship "Sevastopol" (134 times) at different times of the year - and nothing exploded. In addition, it turned out that in fact there were two explosions, and of such force that two large deep craters appeared at the bottom, which the explosion of one mine cannot leave.

As for the version about the work of saboteurs from Italy or England, in this case a number of questions arise. First, an action of this scale is possible only with the participation of the state. And it would be very difficult to hide the preparations for it, given the activity of Soviet intelligence in the Apennine Peninsula and the influence of the Italian Communist Party.

Individuals would not be able to organize such an action - too large resources would be needed to support it, starting with several tons of explosives and ending with means of transportation (again, let's not forget about secrecy). This is permissible in feature films such as "Dogs of War", but in real life becomes known to the relevant services at the planning stage, as was the case, for example, with the unsuccessful coup in Equatorial Guinea. In addition, as the former Italian combat swimmers themselves admitted, their life after the war was tightly controlled by the state, and any attempt at amateur performance would be thwarted.

In addition, preparations for such an operation should be kept secret from the allies, primarily from the United States. Had the Americans found out about the impending sabotage of the Italian or British navies, they would certainly have prevented this - in the event of a failure, the United States would not have been able to cleanse itself of accusations of inciting war for a long time. It would be madness to launch such a sortie against a nuclear-armed country in the midst of the Cold War.

Finally, in order to mine a ship of this class in a protected harbor, it was necessary to collect complete information about the security regime, anchorage places, ships' exits to the sea, and so on. It is impossible to do this without a resident with a radio station in Sevastopol itself or somewhere nearby. All operations of Italian saboteurs during the war were carried out only after thorough reconnaissance and never "blindly". But even after half a century, there is not a single evidence that in one of the most guarded cities of the USSR, thoroughly filtered by the KGB and counterintelligence, there was an English or Italian resident who regularly supplied information not only to Rome or London, but also to Prince Borghese personally.

Supporters of the Italian version argue that some time after the death of "Novorossiysk" in the Italian press flashed a message about the awarding of orders to a group of officers of the Italian Navy "for completing a special task." However, so far no one has published a single photocopy of this message. References to the Italian naval officers themselves, who once declared to someone about their participation in the sinking of the Novorossiysk, were unsubstantiated for a long time.

Yes, information about the explosion of Novorossiysk appeared in the Western press very quickly. But comments from Italian newspapers (with vague hints) are a common journalistic device, when "credible" evidence emerges after the fact. It should also be borne in mind that the Italians melted down their "younger" battleships, which they received back from NATO allies. And if there hadn't been a disaster with the Novorossiysk, the battleship Giulio Cesare in Italy would have been remembered only by the historians of the Navy.

Overdue awards

Based on the report of the government commission by the command of the Black Sea Fleet in November 1955, the acting commander-in-chief of the USSR Navy, Admiral Gorshkov, was sent submissions on awarding orders and medals to all sailors who died along with the battleship. 117 people from among those who survived the explosion, sailors from other ships who came to the aid of Novorossiysk, as well as divers and doctors who distinguished themselves in the course of rescue operations were also nominated for awards. To Sevastopol, to the headquarters of the fleet, they delivered required amount awards. But the award never took place. Only forty years later it became clear that on the submission by the hand of the head of the personnel department of the Navy of that time, a note was made: "Admiral comrade Gorshkov does not consider it possible to come up with such a proposal."

Only in 1996, after repeated appeals from the ship's veterans, the Russian government gave appropriate instructions to the Ministry of Defense, the FSB, the Prosecutor General's Office, the Russian State Maritime Historical and Cultural Center and other departments. The main military prosecutor's office began checking the materials of the investigation carried out in 1955. All this time the classified award lists for the "Novorossiysk" were kept in the Central Naval Archives. It turned out that 6 sailors were posthumously presented to the highest award of the USSR - the Order of Lenin, 64 (53 of them were posthumously) - to the Order of the Red Banner, 10 (9 posthumously) - to the Orders of the Patriotic War of the 1st and 2nd degree, 191 ( 143 posthumously) - to the Order of the Red Star, 448 sailors (391 posthumously) - to the medals "For Courage", "For Military Merit", Ushakov and Nakhimov.

Since by that time there was no longer either the state under the naval flag of which Novorossiysk perished, or Soviet orders, all Novorossiysk citizens were awarded the Orders of Courage.

memorial at the Bratsk cemetery in the form of a 12-meter figure of the Mourning sailor, cast from bronze of the battleship's propellers, installed in 1963

The real reason for the death of the battleship.

More recently, news agencies reported that Hugo D'Esposito, a veteran of the Italian division of combat swimmers Gamma, admitted that the Italian military was involved in the sinking of the Soviet battleship Novorossiysk. Writes about this 4Arts.

According to Hugo D'Esposito, the Italians did not want the "Russians" to get the ship, so they made sure to sink it.

Earlier, the version that "Novorossiysk" sank as a result of sabotage organized by the Italians was not officially confirmed.

After the death of Novorossiysk, various explanations for the possible sabotage were put forward (according to one of them, the explosives were allegedly hidden in the ship's hull already at the time of its transfer to the Soviet Union).

In the mid-2000s, the magazine "Itogi", having published material on this topic, placed in it the story of a certain submarine officer Nikolo, allegedly involved in the sabotage. According to him, the operation was organized by the former commander of submarine saboteurs Valerio Borghese, after handing over the ship, vowing "to take revenge on the Russians and blow it up at any cost." The sabotage group, according to the source, arrived on a mini-submarine, which, in turn, was secretly delivered by a cargo steamer from Italy. The Italians, as the newspaper wrote, equipped a secret base in the Sevastopol Bay Omega, mined the battleship, and then went out on a submarine into the open sea and waited to be picked up by "their" steamer.

Now I wonder if the relatives of the victims will sue Italy? Here is the site dedicated to the battleship and sailors.

sources
http://flot.com/history/events/novorosdeath.htm
http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/21/sink/
http://korabley.net/news/2009-04-05-202

Let me remind you of a few more ship stories: for example, Is it really? And here's another interesting story - The original article is on the site InfoGlaz.rf The link to the article this copy was made from is

Now I propose to see a photo of the ship.

After Italy's withdrawal from the war, the victorious countries divided the Italian warships at the expense of reparations. The Soviet Union claimed new battleships of the Littorio class, but it only got the outdated Giulio Cesare. Immediately it was not possible to get the ship, so the British temporarily handed over to the USSR their old dreadnought "Royal Sovereign", which received the name "Arkhangelsk" in the Soviet fleet. In 1948, after "Cesare" went to the Soviet port, "Arkhangelsk" was returned to England for cutting into scrap metal.

Although by the end of the war only two old battleships - Sevastopol and October Revolution - remained in service from Soviet heavy ships - the USSR still had ambitious plans for the construction of battleships, and it was planned to use the Cesare to train crews.

December 9, 1948 "Cesare" left the naval base Taranto and moved to Augusta, from where on December 15 went to the Albanian port of Vlora (Valona). There, on February 3, 1949, the battleship, which received the temporary designation Z11, was transferred to the Soviet commission, headed by Rear Admiral G.I. Levchenko. On February 6, the USSR naval flag was raised on the ship, and two weeks later it left for Sevastopol, arriving at a new base on February 26. By order of the Black Sea Fleet of March 5, 1949, the battleship was named Novorossiysk.

"Giulio Cesare" in completion, Genoa autumn 1913

"Giulio Cesare", team formation at the stern 1925-1926

"Giulio Cesare" on maneuvers, 1926

"Giulio Cesare" in Taranto, October 1937

"Giulio Cesare" after modernization, 1940

Damage to the Giulio Cesare superstructure from 381-mm shells hit from the battleship Worspite in battle on July 9, 1940

The battleship "Giulio Cesare", 1941

37 mm twin automatic installations on "Giulio Cesare", May 1941

"Giulio Cesare" in the Mare Piccolo basin, Taranto November 1948

The battleship "Novorossiysk" in Sevastopol, 1949

"Novorossiysk" in Sevastopol, early 1950s

On the deck of the battleship "Novorossiysk" in Sevastopol, early 1950s

The main caliber of the battleship "Novorossiysk"

On the deck of "Novorossiysk", 1954

The battleship "Novorossiysk" and the tanker "Fiolent", 1954

Rise of the battleship "Novorossiysk", May 1957

The question of the lifespan of an airplane, ship or car, of course, does not have an exact answer. Someone in their third decade has been driving their beloved Buick Roadmaster, others change cars every four years. This is a story about a battleship with a difficult history, its two lives and an unexpected death.

Almost 60 years ago, on October 29, 1955, a catastrophe occurred that ended the long and difficult journey of one of the most famous ships in history. In the Northern Bay of Sevastopol, the Italian battleship "Giulio Cesare" ("Julius Caesar") sank from the explosion, which, however, by the time of its death had long become the flagship of the Black Sea squadron of the Soviet Navy and went under the new name "Novorossiysk". More than six hundred sailors were killed. For a long time, the details of these events were not disclosed, the versions of the tragedy were kept secret - it is not surprising at all, because extremely strange events in the Sevastopol Bay led to a reshuffle in the command of the USSR Navy.

Giulio Cesare

The battleship "Novorossiysk" at the time of the catastrophe was forty-four years old - a very respectable time for a warship. For most of his life he was known as "Giulio Cesare" - and for a long time sailed under the flag of the Italian Navy.

Dreadnought "Giulio Cesare" on the slipway, 1911.

The history of Julius Caesar began on June 27, 1909, when Italy decided to modernize its combat fleet and approved a large-scale project to build three cruisers, twelve submarines, as well as a dozen destroyers, thirty-four destroyers and, finally, three dreadnought battleships according to the 1908 project of the year. So in 1910 in Genoa, the future "Leonardo da Vinci", "Conte di Cavour" and "Giulio Cesare" were laid, which was originally meant as a flagship.

The British loved to joke about the Italian fleet, they say, Italians are much better at building ships than they know how to fight on them. All jokes, but Italy was seriously counting on its new battleships in the upcoming European conflict, and by the beginning of the First World War, "Giulio Cesare" was in the main naval base of Taranto, constantly conducting exercises and shooting. The doctrine of linear artillery combat implied that battleships should engage only with enemy battleships, and the artillery preparation of the crew was carried out the most serious. In 1916, the ship was transferred to the coast of Corfu, in December 1917 - to the southern part of the Adriatic, and by the end of the war she returned to Taranto. The entire baggage of Caesar's experience during the First World War consisted of 31 hours on combat missions and 387 hours on exercises, not a single collision with the enemy followed.

Launching in Genoa, Ansaldo shipyard. October 15, 1911.
Source: Aizenberg B. A., Kostrichenko V. V., Talamanov P. N. "Epitaph of a great dream." Kharkiv, 2007

In the interwar period, "Giulio Cesare", remaining the pride of the Italian fleet, was actively improved and refined. In 1922, the foremast was changed, in 1925 - the fire control system and a catapult for seaplanes was installed. The ship underwent the greatest transformations in the 30s during a major overhaul - at that time it was already more than twenty years old! The battleship's displacement reached 24,000 tons, maximum speed- 22 knots. Initial armament included 13 305-mm guns, 18 120-mm guns, 13 76-mm guns, three torpedo tubes, anti-aircraft guns and heavy machine guns, as a result of modernization the main caliber was bored to 320 mm.

The Italian battleship fought its first serious battle after the outbreak of World War II. On July 6, 1940, at Cape Punta Stilo, the Cesare entered into a firefight with the flagship of the British squadron, the battleship Worspight, but, unfortunately, could not show himself with better side: hit (most historians agree that it was accidental) 381-mm projectile caused a fire on the "Cesar", killed 115 crew members, destroyed light weapons and damaged four boilers. The ship had to retreat.

Giulio Cesare in 1917

In November 1940, British aircraft attacked Italian battleships in the harbor of Taranto, as a result of which the Cesare was transferred first to Naples, then to Sicily. The battleship fought the second serious battle with an English convoy to Malta on November 27. The ships of the opposing sides received minor damage, the Italians retreated when the enemy aircraft approached. In 1941, the Cesare was again unlucky: the ship was damaged by another British air raid and was sent for long-term repairs. By 1942, it became clear that the 30-year-old ship was hopelessly outdated. Due to design flaws, he could die from one torpedo hit, and was also unable to seriously resist enemy aircraft.

Until the end of hostilities, the battleship remained in the harbor, serving as a floating barracks.

"Giulio Cesare" in the battle at Punta Stilo. Photo taken from the battleship Conte di Cavour

"Novorossiysk"

Italy surrendered in 1943. According to the conditions of the allies, the Italian fleet was to be divided between the victor countries. The USSR claimed new battleships, because of the battleships in the ranks of the Soviet Navy, only the pre-revolutionary dreadnoughts "Sevastopol" and "October Revolution" remained, but in conditions of a brewing cold war Neither the United States nor Britain sought to strengthen the fleet of a potential enemy, and instead of the Littorio-class battleship built in the second half of the 1930s, only the old Giulio Cesare was handed over to the USSR. Given the ship's age, the Soviet command decided to use it to train crews. As for the newer Italian battleships, they were returned to Italy as part of the NATO partnership.

On December 9, 1948, the former pride of the Italian fleet, the battleship Giulio Cesare left Taranto and arrived in the Albanian port of Vlora 6 days later. In February 1949, he was transferred to a Soviet commission under the command of Rear Admiral Levchenko. On February 26, the battleship moored in Sevastopol, and by order of March 5, 1949, it was renamed Novorossiysk. Started new life Giulio Cesare.

Taranto, 1948. One of the last photographs of a battleship flying the Italian flag.
Source: Aizenberg B. A., Kostrichenko V. V., Talamanov P. N. "Epitaph of a great dream." Kharkiv, 2007

As the researchers note, the ship was received in an extremely neglected state. Serious repair or replacement required pipelines, fittings, service mechanisms, that is, everything that had not undergone major repairs in the 30s. Before the ship was handed over, the Italians only repaired the electrics so that the ship would at least reach the new home port. At the same time, the restoration of "Novorossiysk" in Sevastopol was hampered by the fact that there were practically no specialists in the USSR who spoke Italian, in which all the documentation on the ship was drawn up. Moreover, the technical documents were not provided in full, which further complicated the repair work.

Despite the difficulties with the operation of the ship, already in August 1949, "Novorossiysk" took part in the squadron's maneuvers as a flagship. He had not yet become a full-fledged combat unit, and it was far from complete recovery, but the Soviet command wanted to demonstrate success in mastering the Italian ship. NATO intelligence made sure that the "Novorossiysk" entered service in the Black Sea Fleet of the USSR, and this was already a sufficient result.

The battleship "Novorossiysk" in the Northern Bay of Sevastopol, 1949

The battleship spent the next six years in constant repairs. During this time, 24 37-mm anti-aircraft guns were installed on it, new radar stations, communications equipment, and Italian turbines were replaced. Nevertheless, the operation of the ship was complicated by extremely uncomfortable conditions for the crew, constant breakdowns and deterioration of the systems.

October disaster

On October 28, 1955, the ship returned to the harbor and took a place in the Northern Bay of Sevastopol, about 110 meters from the coast. The depth was 17 meters, plus about 30 meters of viscous silt.

The tragedy happened a day later. On board "Novorossiysk" there were more than one and a half thousand people: part of the crew (who did not go on leave), new replenishment, cadets and soldiers. A minute-by-minute reconstruction of what happened was subsequently created based on the testimony of surviving eyewitnesses.

On October 29, at 01:31 Moscow time, a powerful explosion occurred under the hull of the ship from the starboard side in the bow. In the underwater part of the hull, a hole with an area of ​​more than 150 square meters was formed, on the left side and along the keel - a dent of more than two meters. The total damage area of ​​the underwater part was about 340 square meters on a 22-meter site. Water immediately poured into the hole, a roll to starboard formed.

At 01:40, the fleet commander was informed about the explosion, and at 02:00 an order was given to tow the ship aground. 02:32 - a strong list to the port side was recorded, by 03:30 the unoccupied sailors were lined up on the deck, rescue vessels were at the side of the battleship, but the evacuation did not begin. As Admiral Parkhomenko later explained, he "did not consider it possible to order the personnel to leave the ship in advance, because until the last minutes he hoped that the ship would be saved, and there was no thought that it would die." "Novorossiysk" began to capsize, the sailors rescued in boats, or simply jumped into the water, many remained inside the battleship.

By 04:14 the ship lay down on the port side, and by 22:00 on October 29, it had completely disappeared under water. In a few hours, 609 people died: from the explosion, covered by the ship's hull in the water, in flooded compartments. According to the recollections of the divers, it was only by November 1 that the seamen, walled up and doomed to death, stopped giving signals.

In May 1957, the ship was raised, taken to the Cossack Bay, studied and dismantled for metal.

Not everything is so simple

To find out the reasons for the explosion, a special government commission was created, headed by the Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR Vyacheslav Malyshev. Contemporaries spoke of him as an engineer of the highest erudition, a high-class specialist in shipbuilding, who, as is typical, back in 1946, recommended abandoning the acquisition of Giulio Cesare. In accordance with the tight deadlines set, the commission issued its opinion two and a half weeks later. The official version said that the explosion was caused by a German magnetic mine left over from the Second World War, with a force charge of 1000-1200 kg in TNT equivalent. Parkhomenko was declared the direct culprit of the death of people, battleship commander Captain Khurshudov; and Vice Admiral Kulakov, a member of the Military Council of the Black Sea Fleet.

Strange story. Believe it or not? The Italian swimmer nevertheless admitted to blowing up the battleship in Sevastopol ... But doubts arise as to the veracity of this version.

Veteran of the Italian division of combat swimmers "Gamma" Hugo D'Esposito admitted that the Italian military was involved in the sinking of the Soviet battleship Novorossiysk. 4Arts writes about this, noting that the words of Hugo d "Esposito" are the first admission of involvement in the destruction of Novorossiysk by the Italian military, who had previously categorically denied such a version. : "It directly confirms the likely hypothesis about the cause of the explosion on the ship."
According to Hugo D'Esposito, the Italians did not want the "Russians" to get the ship, so they made sure to sink it: "They did everything possible." But he did not specify exactly how the sabotage was carried out.
Earlier, the version that "Novorossiysk" sank as a result of sabotage organized by the Italians was not officially confirmed.

There is a monument at the old brotherly cemetery in Sevastopol: a 12-meter figure of a grieving sailor with the inscription: "Homeland to sons." The stele reads: "To the courageous sailors of the battleship Novorossiysk, who died in the line of duty on October 29, 1955. Loyalty to the military oath was stronger than death for you." The figure of a sailor is cast from bronze of the battleship propellers ...
Few people knew about this ship and its mysterious death until the end of the 80s, when they were allowed to write about it.

"Novorossiysk" - Soviet warship, battleship of the Black Sea Fleet of the USSR Navy. Until 1948, the ship was part of the Italian Navy under the name "Giulio Cesare" ( Giulio cesare, in honor of Gaius Julius Caesar).
Dreadnought " Giulio cesare"- one of five ships of the" Conte di Cavour "( Giulio Cesare, Leonardo da Vinci, Conte di Cavour, Caio Duilio, Andrea Doria), built according to the project of engineer-general Edoardo Masdea and launched in 1910-1917.
Being the main force of the Italian fleet in two world wars, they did not bring it glory without inflicting on the enemy, and at different times they were Austrians, Germans, Turks, French, British, Greeks, Americans and Russians - not the slightest damage. "Cavour" and "Da Vinci" were killed not in battle, but in their bases.
And "Julius Caesar" was destined to become the only battleship that the victorious country did not scrapped, did not use for experiments, but put into operation the operating fleet, and even as a flagship, despite the fact that it is clearly technically and morally obsolete ...

Giulio cesare was the second in the series, it was built by the firm "Ansaldo" (Genoa). The ship was laid down on June 24, 1910, launched on October 15, 1911, and entered service on May 14, 1914. Received the motto "To withstand any blow."
The armament consisted of 305, 120 and 76 mm guns. The ship's displacement was 25 thousand tons.

The battleship "Giulio Cesare" after modernization in 1940

"Giulio Cesare" was involved in the battles of the First and Second World Wars. After the end of World War II, it went to the Soviet Union on account of reparations. At the Tehran Conference, it was decided to divide the Italian fleet between the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and the countries that suffered from fascist aggression. By lot, the British received the latest Italian battleships of the Littorio class. The USSR, to whose share the "Cesare" fell, was able to transfer it to Sevastopol only in 1949. By the order of the Black Sea Fleet of 03/05/1949, the battleship was named "Novorossiysk".

The battleship was in an extremely neglected state - it was mothballed in the port of Taranto for 5 years. Immediately before the transfer to the USSR, it underwent minor repairs (mainly of the electromechanical part). They could not translate the documentation, and the ship's mechanisms needed to be replaced. Experts noted the shortcomings of the battleship - the antediluvian level of intra-ship communications, poor survivability systems, damp cockpits with three-tiered bunks, a tiny faulty galley.
In mid-May 1949, the battleship was delivered to the Northern Dock, and a few months later she went to sea for the first time as part of the Black Sea Fleet. In subsequent years, it was constantly repaired and refitted, was in service, not meeting the requirements for a combat ship in many indicators of the technical condition. Due to everyday difficulties, the primary repair and restoration work on the battleship was the equipment of the galley for the crew, the isolation of the living and office premises under the deck of the forecastle, as well as the re-equipment of some of the bathrooms, washbasins and showers.
At the same time, specialists were amazed at both the elegance of the contours of the underwater part and the nature of its fouling. Only the area of ​​variable waterline was intensively overgrown with shells, and the rest, covered with a paste of unknown composition, was almost not overgrown. But the bottom-outboard fittings turned out to be in an unsatisfactory condition. Moreover, as the last commander of the battleship BCH-5, I.I.
From 1950 to 1955, the battleship was under factory repair 7 times. However, some shortcomings were not eliminated until October 1955. Modernization work caused a small increase in ship mass(about 130 t) and deterioration of stability(the transverse metacentric height decreased by 0.03 m).

In May 1955, the Novorossiysk entered service with the Black Sea Fleet and went out to sea several times until the end of October, practicing combat training tasks.
On October 28, 1955 "Novorossiysk" returned from the last cruise and took a place on the "battleship barrel" in the area of ​​the Marine Hospital, where the "Empress Maria" once stood ...

Before dinner, the ship was replenished with infantry soldiers transferred to the navy. At night they were placed in the bow quarters. For most of them, this was the first and last day of their naval service.
On October 29 at 01.31 a powerful explosion was heard under the hull of the bow of the ship. An emergency combat alert was declared on the ship, an alarm was also announced on the ships standing nearby. Emergency and medical teams began to arrive at Novorossiysk.
After the explosion, the bow of the ship plunged into the water, and the anchored anchor was firmly held by the battleship, not allowing it to be towed to the beach. Despite all the measures taken, water continued to flow into the ship's hull. Seeing that the flow of water could not be stopped, the acting commander Khorshudov turned to the fleet commander, Vice Admiral Parkhomenko, with a proposal to evacuate part of the team, but was refused. The evacuation order was issued too late. More than 1,000 sailors have gathered at the stern. Lifeboats began to approach the battleship, but only a small part of the crew managed to disembark on them. At 4.14 the hull of the ship suddenly jerked and began to roll to the port side and after a moment turned upside down with the keel. According to one version, Admiral Parkhomenko, not imagining the size of the hole, gave the command to be towed to the dock, and this destroyed the ship.

"Novorossiysk" overturned as rapidly as almost half a century before it "Empress Maria". Hundreds of sailors were in the water. Many, especially former infantrymen, quickly sank under the weight of wet clothes and boots. Part of the team managed to climb onto the bottom of the ship, others were picked up on boats, some managed to swim to the shore. The stress from the experience was such that some of the sailors who swam to the shore could not stand their hearts, and they immediately fell dead. Many people heard a frequent knock inside the hull of the capsized ship - this was the signal given by sailors who did not have time to get out of the compartments.
One of the divers recalled: “At night, then for a long time I dreamed of the faces of people whom I saw under water in the windows, which they were trying to open. With gestures, I made it clear that we would save. People nodded, they say, they understood ... I plunged deeper, I can hear them knocking with Morse code, - the knocking in the hearth is clearly audible: "Save quickly, we are suffocating ..." I also tapped them: "Be strong, everyone will be saved." And then it began! They started knocking in all the compartments so that they would know above that the people who were under the water were alive! Moved closer to the bow of the ship and could not believe my ears - they are singing "Varyag"! "
Through a hole cut in the aft part of the bottom, 7 people were pulled out. Two more were rescued by divers. But air began to flow out of the cut hole with increasing force, and the overturned ship began to sink slowly. In the last minutes before the death of the battleship, it was heard how the sailors, walled up in the compartments, sang "Varyag". In total, 604 people died during the explosion and sinking of the battleship, including emergency parties from other ships of the squadron.

In the summer of 1956, the EON-35 special-purpose expedition began lifting Novorossiysk. The operation was carried out in the morning of May 4 and on the same day the ascent was completed. The news of the upcoming surfacing of the battleship spread throughout Sevastopol, and, despite heavy rain, all the shores of the bay and nearby hills were strewn with people. The ship floated upward with its keel, and it was taken to the Cossack Bay, where it was turned over and hastily dismantled for scrap.

As it was then stated in the order for the fleet, the cause of the explosion of the battleship was a German magnetic mine, allegedly lying on the bottom since the war for more than 10 years, which for some reason unexpectedly came into action. Many sailors were surprised, because on this place of the bay, immediately after the war, a thorough trawling was carried out and, finally, mechanical destruction of mines in the most critical places. On the barrel itself, the ships anchored hundreds of times ...

After lifting the battleship, the commission carefully examined the hole. It was monstrous in size: more than 160 square meters. The force of the explosion was so incredible that it was enough to pierce eight decks - including three armored ones! Even the upper deck was twisted from starboard to port ... Even the largest German mines were not as powerful.

The death of "Novorosiysk" gave rise to many legends. The most popular of these is the sabotage of Italian naval saboteurs. This version was supported by the experienced naval commander Admiral Kuznetsov.

Valerio Borghese

During the war, Italian submariners were stationed in the captured Sevastopol, so that some of Borghese's associates were familiar in the Sevastopol Bay. But how could the penetration of an Italian submarine to the entrance to the main base of the fleet, 10 years after the end of the war, go unnoticed? How many flights from the submarine to the battleship did the saboteurs have to make in order to place several thousand tons of TNT on it? Maybe the charge was small and served only as a detonator for a huge mine, which the Italians placed in a secret compartment at the bottom of the battleship? Such a tightly certified compartment was discovered in 1949 by Captain 2nd Rank Lepekhov, but there was no reaction from the command to his report.

Some historians argue that the members of the commission, with the support of Khrushchev, distorted many facts of the tragedy, after which only the temporary acting commander of the Black Sea Fleet, Vice Admiral V.A. Parkhomenko and Admiral of the Fleet N.G. Kuznetsov, removed from the leadership of the Navy and demoted by two steps. There is a version that Khrushchev thus avenged the admiral for his harsh commentary on the transfer of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR.
Soon after the death of "Novorossisk" flew from their posts the chief of intelligence of the Black Sea Fleet, Major General Namgaladze and the commander of the OVR (protection of the water area) Rear Admiral Galitsky.

By order of the fleet, families of the victims were given lump-sum benefits - 10 thousand rubles each. for the dead sailors and 30 thousand - for the officers. Then they tried to forget about Novorossiysk ...
Only in May 1988, the newspaper Pravda published for the first time a small article dedicated to the death of the battleship Novorossiysk with the recollections of eyewitnesses of the tragedy, which described the heroic behavior of sailors and officers who were inside the capsized ship.
(from here)

After the death of Novorossiysk, various versions were put forward.

Versions about the causes of the explosion
Official version. According to the official version put forward by the government commission, the battleship was blown up by a bottom magnetic mine set by the Germans in 1944 when leaving Sevastopol. On November 17, the conclusion of the commission was presented to the Central Committee of the CPSU, which adopted and approved the conclusions. The cause of the disaster was called "an external underwater explosion (non-contact, bottom) of a charge with TNT equivalent of 1000-1200 kg." The most probable was the explosion of a German magnetic mine left on the ground after the Great Patriotic War.
However, power supplies were removed in the 50s. bottom mines turned out to be discharged, and fuses were inoperative.

Professor, Engineer-Captain 1st Rank N.P. Muru in his book Catastrophe in the Inner Roads, he proves that the most likely cause of the ship's death is the explosion of a bottom mine (two mines). N.P. Muru believes that after the catastrophe, trawling of bottom silt, 17 such mines were found, of which 3 were within a radius of 100 m from the place where the battleship was destroyed.

Opinion Y. Lepekhova, Lieutenant Engineer of the battleship Novorossiysk: the explosion was caused by German magnetic underwater mines. But at the same time, due to the nature of the destruction of the battleship's hull (the ship was pierced through and through by the explosion, and the hole in the bottom does not coincide with the hole on the deck), he believes that the mine explosion caused a detonation of the charge that was laid on the ship by the Italians even before it was transferred to the Soviet side. Lepekhov claims that when, during acceptance, he and other members of the commission examined the ship, they buried themselves in a deaf bulkhead in the bow of the battleship. Then they did not attach importance to this, but now Lepekhov believes that there was a powerful explosive charge behind this bulkhead. This charge should have been activated some time after the transfer of the ship, but for some reason this did not happen. But already in 1955, this charge detonated, serving as the main reason for the death of the ship.

In a number of later studies of the destruction of the battleship, it was shown that to cause the destruction that Novorossiysk received - through penetration of the hull from the keel to the upper deck, it would take about 2-5 tons of TNT, if the charges were placed directly at the bottom of the hull, or 12, 5 tons of TNT, when the charges were placed on the bottom, under the battleship, at a depth of 17.5 m. damage to the battleship when it explodes on the ground. In this case, only the first and second bottoms of the battleship would have been pierced, which is confirmed by experimental data. In the area of ​​the explosion, a search for mine fragments was undertaken, the silt was washed, but nothing was found.

Explosion of ship ammunition... This version disappeared after an examination of the hull: the nature of the destruction indicated that an explosion had occurred. outside.

Meeting in Sevastopol in September 1955... There is a version that the ship was deliberately blown up during a discussion about the directions of the fleet's development. We will come back to this version ...

Sabotage... The commission's conclusions did not exclude the possibility of sabotage. On the eve of the transfer of the battleship to the USSR, there were open calls in Italy to prevent the pride of the Italian fleet from falling under the Soviet flag. Some bloggers claim that it was planned to prepare the 320-mm main caliber of the Novorossiysk for firing shells with nuclear filling. As if, just on the eve of the battleship, after long setbacks, it was as if it were fired by experimental special shells (without a nuclear charge) at training targets.

In the mid-2000s, the Itogi magazine published the story of a certain submarine officer Nikolo, allegedly involved in the sabotage. According to him, the operation was organized by the former commander of the flotilla of submarine saboteurs V. Borghese, after handing over the ship, vowing "to take revenge on the Russians and blow it up at all costs." The sabotage group arrived in a mini-sub, which in turn was secretly delivered by a cargo steamer from Italy. The Italians allegedly set up a secret base in the Sevastopol Omega Bay area, mined the battleship, and then went on a submarine to the open sea and waited for their "own" steamer to pick them up.

Reference:

Prince Junio ​​Valerio Scipione Borghese(ital. Junio ​​Valerio Scipione Ghezzo Marcantonio Maria dei principi Borghese; June 6, 1906, Rome - August 26, 1974, Cadiz) - Italian military and political leader, captain of the 2nd rank (Italian. capitano di fregata).
Born into an aristocratic Borghese family. In 1928 Borghese graduated from the Naval Academy in Livorno and joined the submarine fleet.
An interesting detail: in 1931 Borghese married a Russian countess Daria Vasilievna Olsufieva(1909-1963), with whom he had four children and who died tragically in a car accident in 1962. Her name bears the prize for connoisseurs of Rome.

Since 1933 Borghese is a submarine commander, has carried out a number of successful operations, sank the Allied ships with a total displacement of 75 thousand tons. Received the nickname "Black Prince". He initiated the creation of a unit in the X flotilla that used combat swimmers. Since 1941, as acting, since 1943 he officially commanded the X Flotilla, which became the most successful formation of the Italian Navy.

10-flotilla of assault vehicles ( Decima Flottiglia MAS) - a detachment of naval saboteurs in the Italian Navy, created in 1941. It consisted of a surface unit (boats with explosives) and an underwater unit (guided torpedoes). He also had a special unit "Gamma", which included combat swimmers. The unit was originally part of the 1st IAS flotilla, then received the name "Tenth IAS Flotilla". MAS is an abbreviation for Italian. Mezzi d "Assalto- assault equipment; or ital. Motoscafo Armato Silurante- armed torpedo boats.

The SLC guided torpedo, which was called the "piggy" in the 10th flotilla, was essentially a small boat capable of diving to shallow depths. Dimensions - 6.7 m long and 53 cm wide. Thanks to the tanks for ballast and compressed air, the torpedo could submerge to a depth of 30 m. Two propellers were driven by an electric motor powered by a battery. The torpedo developed a speed of three knots (5.5 km / h) and had a cruising range of 10 nautical miles (18.5 km).

The torpedo was delivered to the scene of hostilities on an ordinary submarine. Then two saboteurs sat on her astride one after the other, like on a horse. The pilot and the torpedo commander were sitting on it. They were protected from the shock of waves by a glass shield, and at the base of the shield there were onboard instruments: a magnetic compass, a depth gauge, a roll gauge, a steering lever, engine and pump switches that held the torpedo at the desired depth.
A mechanic diver sat behind the pilot. With his back he was leaning against a container with tools (a cutter for locking nets, a spare oxygen device, ropes and clamps for fixing an explosive charge). The crew was dressed in light spacesuits and used an oxygen breathing apparatus. The oxygen cylinders were enough for 6 hours.
Having sailed to the enemy's ship as close as possible, the torpedo sank, and the diver fixed the 300-kilogram explosive charge brought with him to the hull of the ship. Having installed the clockwork, the swimmers boarded the torpedo and returned to base.

At first there were setbacks: the "pigs" drowned, they were destroyed, caught in the nets, the crew was poisoned and suffocated because of the imperfect air supply system, torpedoes were simply lost at sea, and so on. But then the "pigs" began to make progress: on the night of November 18-19, 1941, "live torpedoes" sank two British ships - Queen Elizabeth and Valiant: "The Italians won one of the most brilliant victories in the history of naval wars. 6 people were seriously injured. 2 battleships in a strictly guarded port ".
(from here)

Nuance: the practice of underwater saboteurs, both English and Italian, during the Second World War did not involve hanging such large charges under the ship's hull as in Sevastopol.
Italian submarine saboteurs on guided torpedoes ("Maiale") suspended a charge under the bottom weighing only about 300 Kg... So they acted, carrying out sabotage in Alexandria on 19.12.1941, damaging 2 British ships of the line ("Queen Elizabeth" and "Veliente") and in Gibraltar in 1941-1943.
The charges were suspended for lateral keels ships using special clamps called "sergeants".
Note that there were no side keels on the battleship Novorossiysk in the area of ​​the explosion (30-50 frames) ...

Another sabotage version: installation under the bottom of the battleship magnetic mines... But you had to have about hundreds underwater saboteurs-swimmers carrying a magnetic mine underwater to create a charge under the bottom about 2 t.... For example, Italian divers from the "Gamma squad", which is part of the 10th IAS flotilla, during sabotage during the Second World War, transported charges of the "Minyatta" or "Bauletti" type with a total weight no more than 12 kg.

Should I believe Signor Hugo D'Esposito? It still seems to me not entirely clear how Did the Italian swimmers manage to penetrate the Sevastopol bay, and most importantly, deliver a bunch of explosives to the place of sabotage? Maybe the former saboteur still lied?

From the "Information on the regime in the area of ​​the Main Base from October 29, 1955", it follows that during October 27-28, 1955, the following foreign ships were on the transition in the Black Sea:
- Italian "Gerosi" and "Ferdinando" from Odessa to the Bosphorus;
- Italian "Esmeraldo" and French "Sanche Kondo" from Novorossiysk to the Bosphorus;
- French "Roland" from Poti to the Bosphorus;
- Turkish "Demirkalla" from the Bosphorus to Sulina.
All ships were at a considerable distance from the main base ...

The submarine saboteurs were also supposed to have complete information about the security regime of the Main Base of the Black Sea Fleet, the places of anchorage and exit of ships. They should have known that the boom gates to the Sevastopol Bay would be open, that the battleship, returning from the sea on October 28, 1955, would stand on barrels No. 3, and not in its regular place - barrels No. 14 in the very depths of the bay.
Such information could be collected only by an intelligence resident located in Sevastopol, and it was possible to transmit a "signal" to saboteurs on the submarine only by radio communication. But the presence of such a resident in closed (1939-1959) Sevastopol and his possible actions in the interests of Prince Borghese seem unrealistic.
And he could not get information about which barrels the battleship would stand on. it was transferred to "Novorossiysk" when it was already at the Inkerman sections immediately in front of the entrance to the base.

The question is:
- Where did the saboteurs set mines in "magnetic cylinders" if the battleship was at sea all day on October 28?
- how could they finish all the work on October 28 by “sunset” and even “sail” back to Omega, if the sun set on October 28, 1955 in the Sevastopol region at 17.17 (darkened at 18.47), and the battleship Novorossiysk by the time of sunset the sun has not finished mooring yet ”? He anchored and barrels on 10/28/1955 only in 17.30 !

Let's say the saboteurs managed to set mines. Taking into account their two-fold return and the possible weight of explosive charges (for example, the Miniatta type - 2 kg, the Bauletti type - 4.5 kg, which were used by Italian saboteurs, and each swimmer wore 4-5 such mines on his belt), they could install a charge weighing a maximum of 540 kg under the bottom of the battleship. This is clearly not enough to inflict the damage that the battleship received. Note also that the Minyatta mine was attached to the underwater part of the ship by suction, while the Bauletti mine was attached to the side keel of the ship with two clamps, i.e. these were not magnetic mines. There were no side keels on the Novorossiysk in the area of ​​the explosion. Assume that magnetic mines were specially made? But why, if the Italians had mines already tested in real business?

The opinion of the former Italian submarine saboteurs.
A.N. Norchenko met with these people in 1995 in Italy, and described these meetings in his book "The Cursed Secret":
- Luigi Ferraro, an underwater saboteur who served in the squadron of underwater swimmers ("squadron Gamma"), who blew up several ships during the war, a national hero of Italy, holder of the Great Gold Medal for Military Valor.
- Evelino Marcolini, in the past a saboteur-torpedoist, during the war participated in an operation against the British aircraft carrier "Aquila", for which he was awarded the Great Gold Medal for military valor.
- Emilio Legnani, began his service as a young officer on the battleship "Giulio Cesare", after the war went to Malta on it, a former saboteur boatman, who served in the assault and torpedo boat detachment of the 10th IAS flotilla. During the war, he visited Gurzuf, Balaklava, Sevastopol. After the war, in 1949, he commanded a detachment of ships, ensuring the safety of a group of ships, which were assigned to the USSR for reparations and went to Albania, where their transfer took place. This detachment of ships was responsible for the safety of the group of ships transferred all the way to the Albanian shores.
All of them were intimately acquainted with the prince Borghese. All of them were awarded, but for their military actions during the war.

Answers to questions about the involvement of Italian saboteurs in the explosion of the battleship "Novorossiysk":
L. Ferrari:
“This question is not new to us. It has already been asked to us in various letters. Everyone asked if we blew up the Giulio Cesare in Sevastopol? I speak responsibly and definitely: these are all fictions. At that time, our country was in ruins, there were enough of its own problems! .. And why do we need all this? This is a distant story. I would admit my participation without any problems, but I do not want to invent something that did not exist.
... I am 95 percent unable to imagine who, except Italians, could do it. But I am 100 percent sure that these are not Italians. We had both equipment and trained people. It seems like there is no one besides us, many people think so. But we have nothing to do with this act. This is absolutely certain. He was of no use to us. And in general, you know, Señor Alessandro, if I had blown up the Giulio Cesare in combat conditions, I would have reported this to you with pride. But I don't want to ascribe it to myself ".

E. Marcolini:
“We are all aware of the fact that more than a ton of explosives were detonated under the battleship. I could have delivered no more than 280 kilograms in my "Mayala" (a guided torpedo driven by E. Marcolini during the war). To deliver our charge to the battleship, we would need support equipment: either a submarine or something like the Olterra. And so that they are not far away. Because there would be practically no power reserve for the return: the torpedo would then have to be drowned, and we ourselves would have to get out just like that.
And this is physically impossible in a little-known place. And even in a matter of minutes ...
There is nothing to say about the swimmers from Gamma. They wouldn't last long in your water.(the water temperature on 10/28/1955 in the Sevastopol region was 12-14 degrees). So I have no idea how I would have done it myself. And why did we need it? ..
If we had actually taken part in the bombing of Giulio Cesare, then it would have immediately become known to everyone, and then we would have been dealt with very quickly, they would have been torn to pieces. And first of all, our leftists, they were then very powerful in Italy. "

E. Legnani answers questions, including about the oath of Prince Borghese on his golden sword to drown the battleship, but not let him serve with the Bolsheviks:
“It's all fantasy. The prince, as far as I knew him, did not take any such oaths to anyone. And we all had the same swords. And in general, why should we Italians take the risk to blow up this rusty box, which barely floated and could hardly shoot ?! I personally know this better than anyone else. Because of him, there was nothing to risk, let him swim and ruin your treasury ... And if anyone had to take revenge, it was England and America - they took from us completely new battleships "Vittorio Veneto" and "Italy", and the Germans bombed "Roma" on the day of the armistice. So from any side this action with Giulio Cesare in Italy was absolutely unnecessary ... The guilty and interested should be looked for elsewhere. "

The answer is at least somewhat cynical, but, apparently, frank.
All these interlocutors advised: determine, who needed all this and was profitable.
Hmmm. It seems that Hugo D'Esposito just decided to brag in his old age.

As for the version about the involvement of British underwater swimmers-saboteurs in the bombing of Novorossiysk, their problems would be the same as those pointed out when analyzing information about a possible “Italian trace”. Besides, no English ships and vessels that could deliver submarine saboteurs or an ultra-small submarine were not observed in the Black Sea at that time.

But if not sabotage of combat swimmers, then what caused the death of the battleship?
The analysis of the versions was carried out in his research by A.D. Sanin ( Once again about the "cursed secret" and various versions of the sinking of the battleship "Novorossiysk").
Interestingly, in the area of ​​the explosion, "A torn part of a barge with a winch, 8-9 m long, 4 m wide, protruding from the ground by 2.5-4 m.", that is, to the bottom of the battleship. It was quite possible to place explosive charges on the barge with a total mass of 2-2.5 tons and more. At the same time, the explosion becomes no longer bottom, but bottom and practically under the very bottom of the battleship (3-5 m remains to the bottom). "Iron sheet without fouling" of dimensions 4x2 m, 20 mm thick could be used for better shielding of charges from the bottom and imparting an upward directed explosion to the explosion. As you can easily calculate, the weight of this sheet is about 1.2 t.
To deliver such a quantity of explosives (more than 2 tons) to a barge under water and to drag a sheet of iron to it, of such dimensions and weight, is clearly beyond the power of underwater saboteurs ... Hence the conclusion that such an operation, if it was carried out, was carried out surface path followed by the sinking of this rusty barge in the area of ​​anchorage number 3.
A.N. Norchenko, comparing the documents on the explosion of the battleship and various objects found at the bottom of the funnel in the area of ​​its parking on barrels No. 3, gives a possible scheme for installing charges under the battleship "Novorossiysk": the first charge detonation occurred closer to the left side of the battleship. The cavity he created in the water accumulated the energy of the explosion of the second charge and gave it a more directional character. The insignificant depth and smoothness of the craters just indicate that the explosions occurred at a certain distance from the ground, equal to the height of the flooded barge, i.e., bottom directed explosions were realized.

The proposed scheme (reconstruction) of the installation of the charge of the LK "Novorossiysk" using a flooded barge

Fragment of the map of the LK "Novorossiysk" parking lot on barrels No. 3

The second sabotage version (O. Sergeev) of the explosion may be associated with the disappearance after the explosion of the regular battleship longboat No. 319 and the command boat No. 1475, standing under the shot, from the starboard side of the battleship at a distance of 10-15 m from the side.
From the explanatory note of the assistant commander of the battleship captain 3rd rank Serbulov dated 30.10.55:
“... Hearing the explosion, in 2-3 minutes I went to the poop. Following to the place of the explosion, from the waist I saw people floating ... and there I discovered that under the right-hand shot there was neither boat # 1475 nor longboat # 319. "
The commission also did not attach any importance to the fact of the disappearance of the boat and the launch, although all the first reports of the explosion were associated with the fact that some gasoline containers had exploded.
From the explanatory note of the Fleet Commander Parkhomenko, presented by him to the commission: "... At about 01.40, Captain of the 3rd rank Ksenofontov called me at the apartment of the OD of the Fleet and reported that at 01.30 petrol tanks had exploded on the battleship Novorossiysk."
But there was no gasoline in the bow of the battleship, gasoline was in the boat # 1475. A completely logical conclusion suggests itself that the traceless destruction of the boat and the launch could have occurred during underwater explosions of charges and the resulting explosion of the gas-air mixture. This led to the smell of gasoline and the first report of the explosion of a gasoline tank.

The explosive charges could possibly have been placed on longboat No. 319, whose displacement is about 12 tons, the length is 12 m, the width is 3.4 m, the side height is 1.27 m. It could accommodate charges weighing up to 2.5 tons and more (for example, 2 FAB-1000 air bombs), as well as a “sheet of iron without fouling” weighing 1.2 tons to give the explosions an upward direction.
If longboat No. 319, during the battleship's departure to the sea on October 28, 1955, did not climb aboard it, but remained at the battleship's boat base in the Sevastopol Bay, then it could well have been "charged" with so many explosives in advance, and then simply sunk at the side battleship.

O. Sergeev believes that the battleship was blown up by two charges with a total TNT equivalent in the range of 1800 kg, installed on the ground in the area of ​​the bow artillery cellars, at an insignificant distance from the center plane of the ship and from each other. The explosions occurred with a short time interval, causing the creation of a cumulative effect and causing damage, as a result of which the ship sank. The bombing was prepared and carried out by the domestic special services with the knowledge of the country's leadership for internal political purposes. Who was this provocation directed against? According to Sergeev, against the leadership of the Navy. The death of "Novorossiysk" was the beginning of a large-scale reduction of the Soviet Navy. Outdated battleships Sevastopol, October Revolution, captured cruisers Kerch, Admiral Makarov, many captured submarines, destroyers and ships of other classes of pre-war construction were used for scrap metal.

Hmmm. It turns out that they did blow up their? For the GRU or the KGB, this was clearly easier than for foreign swimmers, who were simply physically unable to do so.

It is strange that for decades, experts have not been able to establish the cause of the death of the battleship.
And another mystery: 40 years before the explosion of the flagship battleship of the Soviet fleet on the same Sevastopol raid and under the same unexplained circumstances, the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, the dreadnought "Empress Maria", died ...

Eternal memory to the lost sailors.

 

It might be useful to read:

• Scenario for adults new year's commotion in the chicken coop;
• We make handmade soap for the new year;
• "Let's draw Santa Claus";
• A funny new year script with a modern twist for high school students;
• New Year's scenarios for a corporate party are cool;
• New Year's family photo session: ideas for clothes and bright images;
• How to make New Year's soap: photo master class;
• Games, contests for a feast;