The image stabilizer in digital cameras allows you to compensate. Image stabilization technologies in lenses. Stabilizer and back button focus

Optical Image Stabilization is a technology used to mechanically compensate for the camera's own angular movements in order to prevent image blur when shooting at slow shutter speeds. The optical stabilization system built into the lens serves as a kind of replacement for the lens in a certain range of shutter speeds. The gain from using optical stabilization is usually around 3-4 exposure stops. Thanks to the optical stabilization mechanism, in some shooting situations, the photographer can increase the shutter speed and calmly shoot handheld.

Optical image stabilization technology was introduced in 1994 when Canon introduced to the mass market new system, called OIS (Optical Image Stabilizer - optical image stabilizer). The scheme of this optical stabilizer consisted of special lenses that corrected the direction of the light flux inside the lens and electromagnetic drives responsible for the deviations of these same lenses.

The stabilizing element built into the lens was characterized by mobility along the vertical and horizontal axes. On command from the sensor, it was deflected by an electric drive in such a way that the projection of the image on the photosensitive film (or matrix) completely compensated for the camera's vibrations during the exposure. Thanks to this solution, at small amplitudes of camera oscillations, the projection always remains stationary relative to the matrix, which provides the image with the necessary clarity.

The main difficulty in creating such optical stabilization was the exact synchronization of the trembling of the photographer's hands and the amount of deflection of the corrective lenses. However, Canon has successfully dealt with this problem. True, it was not without some shortcomings. In particular, the presence of an additional optical element in the design of the lens reduces its aperture ratio.

The principles of operation of the optical stabilization system, laid down in the early 90s, by and large have remained unchanged up to the present day. The Japanese company was followed by other leading manufacturers of photographic equipment, who presented their optical image stabilization systems, which received brand names:

Canon - Image Stabilization (IS)

Nikon - Vibration Reduction (VR)

Panasonic - MEGA O.I.S. (Optical Image Stabilizer)

Sony-Super Steady Shot

Sony Cyber-shot - Optical SteadyShot

Sigma-Optical Stabilization (OS)

Tamron - Vibration Compensation (VC)

Pentax-Shake Reduction (SR)

Despite different names and descriptions for these systems, they are based on the same approach, but may differ in the degree of effectiveness of camera shake compensation. Let's briefly go through the various options for optical stabilization from well-known manufacturers of photographic equipment.

Canon

As something of a pioneer in the field of optical image stabilization, Canon has traditionally placed great emphasis on implementing this system in its lenses designed for SLR and compact cameras. Branded lenses with a built-in optical stabilization system are marked IS (Image Stabilizer). The IS system provides for an additional group of lenses placed in the middle of the lens structure. The electromagnetic drive allows you to instantly shift one of the lenses of this group relative to the optical axis. Camera vibration is detected by two piezoelectric sensors, often referred to as gyroscopic sensors. One of the sensors detects the horizontal displacement of the camera, while the other, respectively, is responsible for the vertical plane.

Signals from gyroscopic sensors are processed by a microprocessor, which determines the amount and direction of image displacement relative to the optical axis of the lens. Next, the microprocessor drives the electromagnetic drive of the stabilization unit to correct the image position by shifting the movable lens along two axes in a plane perpendicular to the optical axis of the lens. As a result, the image can be stabilized and the degree of "smearing" of the image is reduced. Tests show that the IS system can be effective at shutter speeds up to 2 to 3 stops. You can force it to turn off if needed.

For high-quality macro photography, Canon offers lenses with a built-in Hybrid IS optical stabilization system. Vibration and camera shake significantly affect the quality and clarity of the picture when photographing small objects. And the standard optical stabilization system is not so effective here. New technology The Hybrid IS Optical Stabilization adds another yaw rate sensor to detect the amount of angle deviation due to hand-shake, and a new acceleration sensor that detects the amount of lens movement in a linear plane.

It should be noted that the displacement of the camera in the linear plane has a very strong effect on the quality of macro photography. The IS block now includes four sensors, rather than two, to more effectively compensate for the slightest vibrations of a digital camera. The microprocessor analyzes the signals coming from the sensors and, according to a special algorithm, generates control signals for shifting the stabilizer lens by means of an electromagnetic drive. The Hybrid IS system reduces the effect of both types of "shake", that is, both a sharp change in the angle of the lens direction in a circular plane, and camera shift in a linear plane.

The Japanese company also uses Dynamic IS optical stabilization technology, which has migrated to cameras from video shooting. It is used in telephoto and wide-angle lenses when shooting movies. The Dynamic Optical Image Stabilizer is designed to provide a more stable picture when shooting movies by compensating for low-frequency vibrations such as camera shake or handheld shooting.

Nikon

Other manufacturers are implementing similar technological solutions. In particular, Nikon uses the Vibration Reduction (VR) optical stabilization system in its lenses. It also applies here additional group lenses with a movable element, and the amount and direction of camera movement during exposure of the image are calculated by the microprocessor. It processes data from two gyro sensors at a rate of approximately 1000 values per second. If necessary, the microprocessor, by means of two electric drives, controls the displacement of the movable lens relative to its central position.

The VR system is activated automatically when the photographer presses the shutter button halfway. When the shutter button is pressed halfway, the Image Stabilizer works less effectively and suppresses only slight vibrations for comfortable framing in the viewfinder or LCD monitor. At the moment of fully pressing the shutter button, the movable lens is instantly set to the central position, which allows you to compensate for camera vibrations as efficiently as possible.

Thus, in the process of exposing the image, the most accurate vibration compensation mode is activated, which provides a clearer picture. Using the VR system allows you to increase the exposure time by several times. Various modifications of this optical stabilization mechanism (VR and VR II) are used in a wide range of lenses produced for Nikon SLR cameras.

Panasonic

Panasonic uses an optical stabilization system called MEGA O.I.S, which was originally developed by the company's specialists for branded camcorders, but then was adapted to photographic equipment. In particular, for use in digital cameras of the Lumix line with interchangeable lenses. To compensate for the shift of the image projected through the lens relative to the photosensitive matrix, the optical system is supplemented by a group of lenses with a moving element. Having fixed the vibration of the camera, the built-in gyro sensor sends a signal to the microprocessor to calculate the correction. Then, based on the received data, the microprocessor shifts the stabilizer lens so that the light is directed exactly to the matrix. This whole process takes a matter of fractions of a second.

Owners of Lumix cameras equipped with the MEGAO.I.S. system can switch the stabilizer operation modes. The first mode provides permanent job optical stabilizer, and the second one assumes that the stabilization system turns on only at the moment the shutter release button is pressed. Naturally, the possibility of completely disabling the stabilization system is supported in cases where this is dictated by the shooting conditions or the desire of the photographer.

Pentax has its own proprietary stabilization system called Shake Reduction (SR). For the first time for commercial use, it was introduced in 2006, when the company launched a compact 8-megapixel digital camera Optio A10. Later Pentax began to use this system stabilization not only in their compact, but also in SLR digital cameras.

Shake Reduction technology is based on the shift of the camera's matrix. In this case, it is no longer the movable lens of the stabilizer that moves vertically and horizontally, but the photosensitive matrix of the camera.

Such a stabilization system does not affect the aperture ratio of the lens or the cost of optics, the stabilizer is alone and is located in the camera body, consumes less energy than focusing systems built into the lens.

), including focus.

But still, why can photos be blurry sometimes? What else needs to be considered in the process of photographing so that this does not happen?

The operation of the stabilizer in the camera

Today we will deal with the concept of image stabilizer in SLR cameras. So what is it and why is it needed?

The fact is that the lens and the camera body itself contain a set of complex internal mechanisms. Among them there are sensitive sensors responsible for the perception of camera movement in different directions and at different speeds. That is, the camera's processor initially takes into account the possibility of some error in obtaining an image.

With the help of a special device that counteracts this movement, we see the projected image on the screen clearly, without noticeable blurring.

Of course, at certain moments a stabilizer in the camera is needed, without it the photo will turn out to be of much worse quality than with it. This applies even to cheap “soap dishes”. But built-in stabilization has its limits. Let's take a closer look.

When stabilization is needed:

Hand trembling and unsteady position of the photographer.
Strong wind, shooting on the move or moving objects.
Long focal length lenses. A large focal length can give a significant “shake”, which is sure to be reflected in the photo.
Slow shutter speed needed for special visual effects in a shot or in low light. As the shutter time increases, and as the result of taking the shot, the likelihood of the camera moving increases accordingly.

Image destabilization invariably results in a blurry, fuzzy picture. These problems can be solved in some cases. So, problem #1 and partially #2 can be solved by using a tripod when shooting, or you need to take a more stable position based on both legs.

It is very useful to accustom yourself not to move, to freeze when photographing. Often, beginners have difficulties with this, but the camera needs time to take a picture, and in this regard, extra movements are useless.

To avoid camera shake when working with long focal lengths, as an option, you can get closer, if the shooting conditions allow, then you do not have to unscrew the zoom of the device.

If you have a crop, but you need to multiply the number by the value (1.6 for Canon and 1.5 for Nikon). Thus, we get 1/80 and 1/75, respectively. Thus, it is not recommended to shoot below these limits in order to avoid shaking. Try to follow the rule, although it cannot be an absolute guarantee of getting a sharp frame.

With strong external vibration (shooting while running or in a moving car, in an open area in very windy weather, etc.), even a good stabilizer is unlikely to save you - just take this into account when shooting.

Stabilization in cameras of different models

Where to look for a stabilizer in cameras? The switch is usually located on the side of the lens itself, next to autofocus. And with him everything is simple - incl. and off.

Sometimes, however, in some cameras there are active and normal modes of operation of the stabilizer. The first should be turned on with large fluctuations in equipment, and the second during normal calm shooting. Their differences lie in the frequencies and amplitudes of camera movement that they can extinguish.

Regardless of the camera, stabilizers have the same principle - to make a sharp image, to prevent blurring and fuzziness. The only thing is that its names can be different: for example, in Canon cameras, the stabilization button is called Image Stabilization, in Nikon it is Vibration Reduction. An abbreviation that you will find on your cameras, respectively, IS and VR.

This is with regard to the stabilizer in the lens, but there are other options that have their own merits. Manufacturers of some cameras (for example, Olympus, Sony, Nikon, Canon) have made a stabilizer built into the camera matrix itself.

We can say that stabilization in the lens is convenient, but on the other hand ... what if you come across optics without a stabilizer and there is no stabilizer in the matrix itself?

Most likely, with such parameters of the camera, you will win in its lower price, but you will lose in quality. Thus, the stabilizer in the matrix is more reliable, it allows you to think less about whether a certain lens has this function or not.

For example, such a stabilizer in Nikon cameras called "noise reduction" and is set in the menu.

External stabilizer

What can act as an additional means to stabilize the camera? Of course it is. Here we have a great variety in choice, it can be both a tripod and a monopod. A few words about tripod requirements.

A heavy tripod made of metal rather than plastic will cost more and be more difficult to carry due to the weight, but is more stable. This is a definite plus for stabilization.
The higher you extend the tripod, the greater the potential for camera shake.
Legs: they should be well fixed.

Any weights for the camera are, in fact, do-it-yourself stabilizers. Here, craftsmen offer many options, but the main thing is good stability on the ground and the immobility of the whole structure, achieved due to its weight.

If you are interested in the information and you are ready to go further in learning photography. If you want to learn how to take pictures and get beautiful pictures, then today it became possible. I offer you as a guide, a video course " My first MIRROR". This is a series of video tutorials that will help you understand the basic and important points of getting quality photos.

My first MIRROR- for fans of the CANON SLR camera.

Digital SLR for beginners 2.0- for NIKON DSLR fans.

That's all for today. I look forward to seeing you on my blog again, goodbye and see you soon!

P.S. Do not forget to subscribe to the news and invite your friends and acquaintances and share in in social networks, no one has canceled yet.

All the best to you, Timur Mustaev.

Dear friends, hello! I'm in touch with you, Timur Mustaev. In my article, I would like to discuss with you a very important part of the camera, without which it is extremely difficult, and sometimes simply impossible, to get a good picture. I mean image stabilizer.

The consequences of the lack of stabilization extremely spoil the picture. They may not be visible to a beginner, but a professional will immediately notice them. To understand everything, first of all, you need to understand what a “stabilizer” is and an image stabilizer, optical or digital, which is better to choose.

How to suppress vibration in the camera?

It is not enough to say that a camera with a stabilizer should be a priority. Take this without hesitation! In the end, this function can be turned off, and it is even recommended to do so, for example, when using a tripod. But you probably don't want to part with it.

You begin to understand the meaning of stabilization immediately when you compare pictures with and without it.
Of course, if it is missing, this is not a sentence, and many cameras do not have it. But this does not mean that the camera is not worth buying because of this.

Stabilizer- this is a device inside the camera, the work of which is aimed at combating fluctuations in the process of shooting, eliminating possible interference in the photo due to camera movement

The blurring of the frame is not always noticeable in the process of photographing, especially when it is small, but if you look at every detail on a computer, then most likely something will be fuzzy or as if in a fog. These are the consequences of destabilization.

Naturally, the stability of the photographer is not always ideal. Hands may tremble a little, vibration from the ground or the highway may go, it may be windy outside, etc.

And also manipulations with and are convenient only in some cases, but they are not without drawbacks.

Reducing noise, adding sharpness to the frame and much more can give you processing in editors, but don't you mind wasting your time on these little things? It is best to have a stabilization system built into the device.

Stabilization control can be placed on the side of the lens or be in the menu if the stabilizer is digital.

Let us consider in more detail the options for stabilizers in the camera and their features.

Types of stabilizers

I think it's not worth saying that the stabilizer in the camera is a mandatory and very useful thing. The question is different: if there is a choice, then give preference to optical or digital? In addition to being associated with different areas of the camera, they have different features work.

So, the optical stabilization system is optics, a set of lenses located in the camera lens. It operates according to the principle that the lenses are shifted in the opposite direction from the one in which the movement of the apparatus itself goes, thereby damping vibrations. Users tag her complex device and relative cost.

Benefits- a clear, already balanced picture, which is displayed both in the viewfinder and on the matrix. That is, first a good picture is created, then it is transferred to the sensor. Also, autofocus works well for such a picture, therefore, there are fewer focusing errors on the subject.

True, there are also disadvantages. Since the stabilizer is located outside the camera body itself, if the lens does not have this function, then it will be very difficult for you when shooting. You will have to be guided when using a certain type of lens, with VR (Vibration Reduction) for Nikon or IS (Image Stabilizer) for Canon. Fortunately, there are no problems with the choice of optics now.

This category of optical stabilizers can also include one that is based on a matrix shift. Here: the camera is moving - the matrix is shifted by a certain distance. The movable platform of the light-sensitive device adjusts to the resulting image.

In this option, of course, you don’t have to look for lenses with stabilization, which is quite convenient. Although in this case the matrix will see the image changed, but the focusing system and the photographer in the viewfinder will not yet.

In addition, they note that such a stabilizer does not cope well with its duties, and the effect of it is reduced.

As for the digital (electronic) stabilizer?

In fact, the manufacturers do not assume the presence of a certain device in the camera, which takes up additional space. A powerful processor takes over the whole thing, and the necessary program for suppressing motion vibrations is installed in it.

A camera with a digital stabilizer may cost less than an optical stabilizer, however, have poor quality. To some extent, a digital stabilizer can only be called a post-processing image by a camera that spends a decent percentage of its work not on creating an image, but on counteracting camera shake.

Stabilization will also not work well if the camera has a zoom lens.

So, I think we have fully disclosed the topic of stabilizers, views. And the opinion about which one is better remains with the photographers. Try it yourself, evaluate their capabilities and make a choice. At the same time, do not forget that the stabilizer has specific functions and you should not expect more.

He, for example, will not be able to remove the “stirring” of an object if it is moving quickly, or if you yourself are in active motion. It is only about changing the position of the camera.

If you are serious about photography and want to learn all the most important things about photography and the camera, how to get good shots. I want to recommend you a video course "" or " My first MIRROR».

Why these courses? Everything is simple. They are one of the best on the web. A bunch of junk is now on the Internet that do not bring any knowledge. And I recommend these courses to all my friends who are starting to get involved in photography. They are very easy to understand and they contain only the most important and necessary for understanding. And I will not advise my friends bad!

Digital SLR for beginners 2.0- for fans of the SLR NIKON.

My first MIRROR— for fans of mirror CANON.

Happy readers! creative success and always be on the alert - be in the center of new information on photography. To do this, visit my blog and subscribe to it. If you liked the article, share with your friends, let them discover something new for themselves.

All the best to you, Timur Mustaev.

Every novice amateur photographer's head is spinning from the wealth of choice, if everything is more or less clear with cameras, then there is neither patience nor strength left to choose a lens. And most happy buyers of the first DSLR leave the choice of lens on the conscience of the store manager (does he have one?). And now they bring you a box from which they extract a frightening black pipe, flavoring your hearing with magic spells - "ultrasound (a topic for a separate investigation)" and "stabilizer" and you, of course, give up before the onslaught of technological progress. You spent several days studying the subject, found a store with the best offer for the camera you were interested in, but you just got heated up for several thousand rubles and you didn’t even notice how.

To prevent this from happening, let me introduce you to one of these marketing spells, Image Stabilizer.

So, we are all people and all people are characterized by movement, we cannot freeze like a stone, the heart will beat, and that means we will move. The camera has problems of a different nature, it always lacks light, and if light cannot be added, then its lack can be compensated with time. There are extremely small periods of time in which human movements do not have a significant impact on the clarity of the camera image. But the darker, the more time the camera needs, and at some point we can no longer not move long enough for the camera to get enough light. This contradiction is designed to solve the optical image stabilizer.

It is generally accepted that the maximum shutter speed (for handheld shooting, without image blur) for each specific focal length is a fraction of a second equal to this very distance. That is, for a lens with a focal length of 50mm, the maximum shutter speed will be 1/50s, and for a lens with a focal length of 135mm, the maximum stable shutter speed will be 1/135s.

The stabilizer is able to compensate for your own fluctuations and allows you to quite confidently shoot at shutter speeds exceeding the standard allowable values for each focal length. Another question is what exactly we shoot, and we shoot most often people who are also characterized by movement. There is only one way to make a person freeze like a stone, we will not say which. It has been empirically found that the calm movements of a person are compensated by shutter speeds from 1/100 - 1/135s. At longer shutter speeds, it is much more difficult to “freeze” a person and most of the frames will fly into the trash.

Now let's compare the required shutter speed for different focal lengths and the shutter speed sufficient to shoot a person. It turns out that at focal lengths up to 100mm we can quite easily shoot without any stabilizer.

Of course, the stabilizer can come in handy in some cases, for example in landscape or product photography, where we are not limited in shutter speeds due to the stillness of the subject. But even here the stabilizer is not a panacea. 2 - 4 exposure steps are often not enough either for an evening landscape or for a subject, a tripod and even a monopod give much more opportunities.

But it would seem, why not buy a lens with a stub, just so that it is? But here another problem arises. For some reason, it so happened that the vast majority of lenses with a stabilizer suffer from sharpness, or rather, its absence. Most likely, this is due to the same movable lens block that compensates for movement. It is physically impossible to set the movable element to its original position every time with the same accuracy as permanently fixed glasses. And the minimum shift of the lenses relative to the optical axis has an extremely negative effect on the final picture.

If this does not look convincing, then there are many examples of professional lenses. Consider the widest and most common line of top-class lenses - Canon EF L:

Lenses without stabilizer:

EF16-35mm f/2.8L

EF24-70mm f/2.8L

EF70-200mm f/2.8L

Lenses with stabilizer of the same L series

EF300mm f/2.8L IS

EF300mm f/4L IS

EF400mm f/2.8L IS

EF500mm f/4.5L IS

EF600mm f/4L IS

EF800mm f/5.6L IS

EF24-105mm f/4L IS

EF28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS

EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS

EF70-200mm f/4L IS

EF70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS

EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS

You can see that even in the ultra-TV range there are quite a few lenses without a stabilizer. And in the wide-angle and portrait range, the stabilizer is completely absent. Then why is the vast majority of budget, so-called KIT lenses equipped with stabilizers in all ranges of focal lengths? Why do amateur photographers get an expensive feature that is needed only in rare cases, for which it regularly spoils the picture? The answer is simple - marketing is just another reason to make money on an ignorant buyer.

Of course, the stabilizer is not an absolute evil. In some modern lenses, this function is implemented adequately and not to the detriment of the main optical properties, in the same second version of the EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II. However, my advice to you - if you are faced with a choice of two lenses with the same focal length, in the same price segment, with the only difference - one has a stabilizer, and the second has a aperture one step higher, make a choice in favor of aperture.

p.s. The article does not cover such an image stabilizer function as panning stabilization (the so-called panning shooting), in which the stabilizer compensates only for vertical oscillations, this is a topic for a separate discussion. This stabilizer mode is only available on high-end lenses that adult boys and girls buy, and these people will figure out what to buy without our thinking. We are talking exclusively about the standard stabilizer, which is indiscriminately inserted into all modern whale lenses.

Image stabilization systems are designed to compensate for the shaking of our hands and, accordingly, help us get a sharper picture. There are two main types of stabilization: optical stabilization inside the lens And matrix image stabilization. Let's dwell in more detail on the first type and consider all its ins and outs.

The emergence of stabilization systems inside lenses has its roots in the late film era - the 90s of the last century. In those dashing times for our people, the first lenses with a stabilizer on their board appeared. A pioneer in this path was Canon, which released its first stabilized lens with IS in 1995 (the official announcement of the IS stabilizer took place a year earlier). Nikon pulled itself up only 5 years later and announced a proprietary VR vibration reduction system only in 2000.

Why did you decide to place the stabilizer in the lens barrel? There are several logical explanations for this. The first and most important thing is that in the 1990s people were still shooting with film equipment and technologically it was much easier to introduce a technology that would stabilize the light flux even in the lens, i.e. before that, it fell directly on the camera matrix. Agree, it's easier for the system to do its work inside the lens, and not try to move a roll of 35mm film.

The second argument in favor of the stabilizer inside the lens was the high cost digital cameras and their low popularity. Yes, some time later, living out its last years, Konica-Minolta did introduce the first of its kind matrix image stabilization system. But it has become popular only now - during the total expansion of mirrorless cameras. However, we will talk about this in the second chapter.

Different manufacturers label their lenses differently, which have an image stabilizer on board. But according to the principle of action, they are all similar to each other:

Nikon - VR (Vibration Reduction)
Canon - IS (Image Stabilization)
Sony - OSS (Optical Steady Shot)
Panasonic - MEGA O.I.S. or Power O.I.S. (Optical Image Stabilizer)
Fujifilm - OIS (Optical Image Stabilizer)
Sigma - OS (Optical Stabilization)
Tamron - VC (Vibration Compensation)
Tokina - VCM (Vibration Compensation Module)

Let's take a look at how an on-board stabilizer works using Canon's IS system as an example. To get started, watch this animation:

As you can see, the main role in the process of image stabilization is played by a biconcave lens, which is shifted with the help of electromagnets in the opposite direction relative to the trajectory of the lens. The displacement level is determined by angular velocity sensors equipped with gyroscopes and controlled by a high-speed microcontroller (up to 1000 data readings per second). Why exactly 2 sensors, and not 5 or 10? It's simple - the first is responsible for the horizontal displacement, the second - vertically.

This is what the process looks like in the video:

As a result, the projection of the image remains motionless relative to the camera matrix and at the output we will get a high-quality image without blurring.

The optical stabilizer will work most effectively at shutter speeds close to 1 / focal length. Do you remember the rule according to which the shutter speed directly depends on the focal length? For example, it is possible and necessary to conduct comfortable handheld shooting at 100 mm at shutter speeds of 1/100 s and shorter. This is without a stabilizer. With his direct participation, you can win up to 4-5 stops and shoot not at 1/100 s, but at 1/20-1/25 s.

At short (less than 1/500 s) and long (more than 1/4 s) shutter speeds, it is better to turn off the stabilizer - it can only prevent you from taking the right shot. In the first case, this is due to the fact that the image stabilizer sensor will work at its limits. That and getting a blur at such short shutter speeds is almost impossible.

At slow shutter speeds, the stabilizer is also useless. It is better to use a tripod or set the camera on some stationary object. When the camera is mounted on a tripod, the included stabilizer may well be a source of shake. This is due to the fact that it may try to detect phantom displacements and generate a small vibration itself. Of course, it is unlikely that this can happen, especially with modern systems stabilization, but anything can happen.

Benefits of in-lens stabilization:

Optical stabilization inside the lens is considered more effective, especially when using telephoto lenses. This is due to the fact that to stabilize the image on a long focal length much more difficult - the image sensor must make more movements than its design and location allow.
Opportunity to win from 1 to 5 stops (depending on the generation) when shooting in low light conditions.
When using optical stabilization inside the lens, the image is transmitted to the viewfinder and to the autofocus sensors already stabilized, which allows better control of the subject and more effective autofocus.

Cons of stabilization inside the lens:

Stabilized lenses are more expensive and have larger dimensions.
In some cases, the stabilizer can generate extraneous sounds during operation, which is critical when shooting video.
Using a stub can degrade bokeh.
In the event of the release of the next generation of the stabilizer, you will have to buy new lens– the image stabilization system module is not replaceable.

Today, there are many varieties of stabilization systems inside lenses. This and Canon Hybrid IS, intended for macro photography, and Nikon VR Sport, which can be found on professional telephoto lenses, and other narrowly focused variations. All these systems are designed so that we can shoot at slower shutter speeds in low light conditions and at the same time get a sharp and not blurry picture.

It might be useful to read: