Russian language exam points for assignments. Criteria for evaluating the exam. Maintaining factual accuracy in background material
At the end of May, 11th grade graduates will face a rather difficult test - Unified State Exam in Russian language 2017... This exam is considered compulsory, the same as mathematics, so everyone, without exception, will have to take it. Today, the main task for eleventh graders is timely preparation for the test so that the certificate is not spoiled by a bad grade. In addition, a high score for the Unified State Exam in the Russian language opens the doors for the future applicant to the most prestigious universities in the country.
Most students, assuming that tests in the Russian language are not as difficult as mathematics or physics, do not prepare for the subject at all and, as a result, receive insufficiently high scores. It must be remembered that the exam affects not only the materials for grade 11, but also topics from previous years of study. In addition, the USE includes tasks that require extraordinary thinking. As you can see, the Russian language is not such a simple subject, and considering the future, projected for 2017, it will become even more difficult.
What should you prepare for?
The fact that a number of innovations await tests in the Russian language has been said more than once. Over the years, scientists and teachers have developed an optimal knowledge test system that could reflect the real knowledge of students. In 2017, it is planned to introduce the oral part in the exam in the Russian language. This has already been stated by Lyudmila Verbitskaya (head of the Russian Academy of Education).
On this stage all the necessary transformations have already been developed. It remains only to understand how to use them rationally in this.
Until 2017, all students of secondary schools took Russian language at writing... The test form that was in the forms is, of course, a good thing, but it is not able to reflect the real knowledge of graduates, because they can simply guess the answer. But what about punctuation or spelling? Tests are not able to thoroughly show the student's literacy.
The oral exam will help you identify gaps in knowledge, the ability to accurately express your thoughts, put together sentences from words and lead a narrative that the examiners can understand.
In our time, the correct formulation of speech is extremely important, especially in sectors of the economy. Any leader should be able to formulate tasks for subordinates, be able to express thoughts and convey their ideas to others. Just for this, every student must learn spelling, as well as learn the basics of public speaking.
The oral block is far from all the changes that await the Russian language exam. In the coming 2017, officials intend to introduce a grading system for the control essay. Recall that at the moment for the manifestation of creative abilities and the ability to logically build their own thoughts, the student received simply "credit" or "failure".
Lyudmila Verbitskaya considers this an unfair approach, especially for those students who can show their level of knowledge through writing. Only the introduction of a clear grading scale will help to clearly recognize the student's level of preparedness and form a clear objective view of the exam.
Dates of the
Early exams will begin on May 25, 2017. It is during this period that eleventh graders will be able to pass the Russian language. The main tests are scheduled for May 30. Retake For those who “failed” the subject or wish to improve their grade, there will be an opportunity to pass the re-examination on June 27. The reserve days are designated April 15 and September 24.
Conducting the Unified State Exam in Russian
To cope with all the tasks, students are given an hour. In the allotted time, it is necessary to solve all two blocks, which include 24 questions. The first block consists of questions that must be answered in digital or verbal form. On the second form, students must write an essay on a given topic.
Rating scale
Back in 2015, it was possible to get "pass / fail" for this test. Since 2016, points have appeared, the amount of which depended on the number of correct answers. From the table below, you can find out the exact number of points that can be obtained for a particular question.
The second part of the exam requires the student to be creative and fluent in Russian. Note that essays are graded in a special way, so one cannot surprise an examiner with grammar alone.
For a correctly done second part of the exam, a student can earn 25 points. In general, for two blocks the graduate will earn 57 points, to which points are added on other criteria. Considering that the knowledge assessment system is 100-point, in order to understand what grade the student earned, it is enough to refer to this scheme:
- 0 - 24 - "two"
- 25 - 57 - "three"
- 58 - 71 - "four"
- from 72 - "five"
Note that the minimum number of points for admission to a university is only 36 points, but to obtain a certificate, it is enough to score 24 points.
Materials for preparing for the exam in the Russian language
Nowadays, a lot of literature is published annually, which helps future graduates to prepare for the exam. In addition, a lot of additional materials are provided for general access on the FIPI official website, namely:
- Demo version of the exam
- Quest Forms
- Training compilations
- Video consultations
Among the most optimal literature for preparation, it is worth highlighting the manual from the author Tsybulko I.P.
The punctuation of the document is preserved.
| № | Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1 | Points |
I |
||
K1 |
Formulation of source code problems |
|
| The examinee (in one form or another in any of the parts of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no actual errors in understanding and formulating the problem |
1 | |
| The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the original text. |
0 | |
K2 |
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text |
|
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples from the text read that are important for understanding the problem. |
3 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave 1 example from the text read, which is important for understanding the problem. |
2 | |
|
The text problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the original text, but the examinee did not give a single example from the text read that is important for understanding the problem, or there is one factual error in the comment, related to understanding the problem of the original text |
1 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented on or commented without relying on the original text, or the commentary made more than one factual error related to understanding the original text, or commented on another, |
0 | |
K3 |
Reflection of the position of the author of the source text |
|
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented issue. |
1 | |
| The position of the author of the original text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the original text is not formulated |
0 | |
K4 |
Argumentation by the examinee of their own opinion on the problem |
|
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature) |
3 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge, life experience), or gave only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature |
2 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life experience |
1 | |
| The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected at all in the work |
0 | |
II |
Speech design of the essay |
|
K5 |
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation |
|
|
The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, |
1 | |
|
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and / or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text |
0 | |
K6 |
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
|
| The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. * The examinee receives the highest score on this criterion only if the highest score is obtained according to the K10 criterion |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thoughts |
1 | |
| The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech | 0 | |
III |
Literacy |
|
K7 |
Compliance with spelling norms |
|
| no spelling errors (or 1 blunder) | 3 | |
| no more than 2 mistakes were made | 2 | |
| 3-4 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 4 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K8 |
Compliance with punctuation norms |
|
| no punctuation errors (or 1 blunder) | 3 | |
| 1-3 mistakes were made | 2 | |
| 4-5 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 5 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K9 |
Compliance with language norms |
|
| no grammatical errors | 2 | |
| 1-2 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 2 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K10 |
Compliance with speech norms |
|
| no more than 1 speech error was made | 2 | |
| 2-3 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 3 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K11 |
Compliance with ethical standards |
|
| there are no ethical mistakes in work | 1 | |
| ethical mistakes were made (1 or more) |
0 | |
K12. |
Maintaining factual accuracy in background material |
|
| no actual errors in background material | 1 | |
| made mistakes of fact (1 or more) in the background material |
0 | |
| Maximum points for the whole written work(K1-K12) | 24 |
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account 1.
1. The assessment norms indicated in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150-300 words 2.
2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is estimated at 0 points, the task is considered unfulfilled.
When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - no spelling errors (or one blunder was made);
K8 - no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to the K7-K12 criteria for work from 70 to 150 words is not given.
If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of verification (K1K12) is estimated at 0 points.
If the work, which is a rewritten or retold of the original text, contains fragments of text
of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee are taken into account when checking.
A work written without reference to the text read (not according to this text) is not evaluated.
1 When counting words, both independent and service parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “all the same” - one word, “all the same” - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account in the calculation (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two
the words).
2 If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs middle general education(Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31205)
"61. According to the results of the first and second checks, the experts independently set points for each answer to the tasks of the examination work of the exam with a detailed answer ...
62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant difference in scores was determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject.
The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the points given by the experts who have previously checked the examination paper. "
In the USE in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are assessed, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are an essay on the text. Today in test items it is necessary either to write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or find two correct answers from the proposed ones (task 1 and 15), or name the numbers denoting correct setting commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where it is necessary to correlate the erroneous sentences with the rules according to which mistakes were made.
|
1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect one |
0 to 2 points |
0 to 4 points |
0 to 5 points |
|
For the correct performance of tasks 2-6, 8-14, 16-23 examinee |
For completing tasks 1 and 15, you can get from 0 to 2 points. |
For completing task 24, you can get from 0 to 4 points. Loyal |
For completing task 7, you can get from 0 to 5 points. Loyal |
|
Maximum points |
|||
|
Minimum points |
|||
Essay Evaluation Criteria
|
Points |
||
|
Formulation of source code problems |
||
|
The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no actual errors related to understanding and formulating the problem. |
||
|
The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the original text. |
||
|
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on. There are no actual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments. |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on, no more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the original text. |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented on, made more than 1 factual error in the comments related to the understanding of the original text, commented on another problem not formulated by the examinee, as a commentary, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given, a large portion of the original text is cited as comments. |
||
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented issue. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the original text. |
||
|
Argumentation by the examinee of their own opinion on the problem |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature). |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge or life experience), made only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature. |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life or reading experience. |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, the examinee's opinion is only formally stated (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), not reflected in the work at all. |
||
|
SPEECH DESIGN OF THE ESSAY |
||
|
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation |
||
|
The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; In the work there are no violations of the paragraph division of the text. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, 1 logical error was made, in the work there is 1 violation of the paragraph division of the text. |
||
|
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible, more than 1 logical error was made, there are 2 cases of violation of the paragraph division of the text. |
||
|
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, there is a violation of the accuracy of the expression of thought. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech. |
||
|
LITERACY |
||
|
Compliance with spelling norms |
||
|
no spelling errors (or 1 blunder) |
||
|
1-2 mistakes were made |
||
|
more than 2-3 mistakes were made |
||
| more than 3 mistakes were made | 0 | |
|
Compliance with punctuation norms |
||
|
no punctuation errors (or 1 blunder) |
||
|
1-2 mistakes were made |
||
|
2-3 mistakes were made |
||
| more than 3 errors | 0 | |
|
Compliance with language norms |
||
|
no grammatical errors |
||
|
1-2 mistakes were made |
||
|
more than 2 mistakes were made |
||
|
Compliance with speech norms |
||
|
no more than 1 speech error was made |
||
|
2-3 mistakes were made |
||
|
more than 3 mistakes were made |
||
|
Compliance ethical standards |
||
|
there are no ethical mistakes in work |
||
|
ethical mistakes were made (1 or more) |
||
|
Maintaining factual accuracy in background material |
||
|
no actual errors in background material |
||
|
made mistakes of fact (1 or more) in the background material |
||
|
Maximum points for an essay |
When assessing literacy (K7 – K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The grading norms shown in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150-300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is estimated at 0 points, the task is considered unfulfilled.
When counting words, both independent and service parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “all the same” - one word, “all the same” - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account in the calculation (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words).
If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7 – K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - no spelling errors (or one blunder was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one blunder was made).
1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two mistakes were made;
К8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to the K7 – K12 criteria for work of 70 to 150 words is not given.
If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of verification (K1K12) is estimated at 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee's text, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without reference to the text read (not according to this text) is not evaluated.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31205) “61. According to the results of the first and second checks, the experts independently set points for each answer to the tasks of the exam paper of the Unified State Examination with a detailed answer ... 62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant difference in scores was determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject. The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the points given by the experts who have previously checked the examination paper. "
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points given by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment positions for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
EXAM IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN 11 GRADES (USE)
For the correct execution of all assignments examination work can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.
For the correct execution of each tasks parts 1 (except for tasks 7, 15 and 24) the graduate receives 1 point each... 0 points are given for an incorrect answer or lack of it.
For completing assignments 7 can be exposed from 0 to 5 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (5 points: no mistakes; 4 points: 1 mistake was made; 3 points: 2 mistakes were made; 2 points: 2 numbers were indicated correctly; 1 point: correctly indicated only one digit; 0 points: completely wrong answer, i.e. wrong sequence of digits or its absence). The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.
For completing assignments 15 can be exposed from 0 to 2 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of the answer, the examinee receives 1 point. If 2 numbers are correct, the examinee gets 2 points.
For completing assignments 24 can be exposed from 0 to 4 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of a term from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (4 points: no mistakes; 3 points: 1 mistake was made; 2 points: 2 mistakes were made; 1 point: only one number was correctly indicated; 0 points: completely wrong answer, that is, wrong sequence of numbers or its absence.
Maximum points that can be obtained by a student who has completed the assignment correctly part 2, is 23 points.
Evaluation criteria for an assignment with a detailed answer (essay)
Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1
Points
I
Content of the essay
K1
Formulation of source code problems
The examinee (in one form or another in any of the parts of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text.
There are no actual errors in understanding and formulating the problem
1
The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the original text.
0
K2
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. Factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text, no comments
2
The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented on,or
more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the original text, or commented on another problem not formulated by the examinee,or
as comments, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given,
or
a large fragment of the original text is cited as comments
0
K3
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented issue.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the original text.
1
0
K4
Argumentation by the examinee of their own opinion on the problem
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)
3
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge, life experience), or gave only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature
2
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life experience
1
The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected at all in the work
0
II
Speech design of the essay
K5
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation
The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation:
- there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;
- in the work there are no violations of paragraph division text
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but 1 logical error was made, and / or there is 1 violation of the paragraph division of the text in the work
1
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible,
but more than 1 logical error was made,
and / or
there are 2 cases of violation of the paragraph articulation of the text
0
K6
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
* The examinee receives the highest score on this criterion only if the highest score is obtained according to the K10 criterion
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thoughts
1
The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech
0
III
Literacy
K7
Compliance with spelling norms
no spelling errors (or 1 blunder)
3
no more than 2 mistakes were made
2
3-4 mistakes were made
1
more than 4 mistakes were made
0
K8
Compliance with punctuation norms
no punctuation errors (or 1 blunder)
3
1–3 mistakes were made
2
4-5 mistakes were made
1
more than 5 mistakes were made
0
K9
Compliance with language norms
no grammatical errors
2
1-2 mistakes were made
1
more than 2 mistakes were made
0
K10
Compliance with speech norms
no more than 1 speech error was made
2
2-3 mistakes were made
1
more than 3 mistakes were made
0
K11
Compliance with ethical standards
there are no ethical mistakes in work
1
ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)
0
K12.
Maintaining factual accuracy in background material
no actual errors in background material
1
made mistakes of fact (1 or more) in the background material
0
The maximum number of points for all written work (K1-K12)
When assessing literacy (K7 – K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The grading norms shown in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150-300 words.
If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is estimated at zero points, the task is considered unfulfilled.
When evaluating an essay in volume 70 to 150 words number of errors allowed four types (K7-K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - no spelling errors (or 1 blunder was made);
K8 - no punctuation errors (or 1 minor mistake).
1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than 2 mistakes were made;
К8 - 1–3 mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than 1 speech error was made.
Highest mark by criteria K7-K12 for work in volume 70 to 150 words not put.
If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the check (K1-K12) is estimated at zero points.
If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee's text, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without reference to the text read (not according to this text) is not evaluated.
GOOD LUCK TO YOU,
GRADUATES!
Next year, the Russian government decided to amend the state mandatory exam exam... It is planned to introduce the oral part of the USE in the Russian language 2017. Algorithms for the oral part are already there. As with the surrender foreign languages orally, the student listens to the assignment for twenty minutes and answers five questions, describing the picture and asking questions. Next, the reviewers listen to the student's recording and give a grade. This model of the oral part of the exam in the Russian language suits the experts. The only thing that is required from the government of the country is to quickly and efficiently equip premises for passing this type of exam. Because, unlike foreign languages, about 700 thousand applicants pass Russian annually. The only aesthetic inconvenience is the passing of an oral exam for children with speech impairments, but this is now being considered by teachers to improve the overall delivery system.
It might be helpful to read:
- How scammers sell fake iPhones under the guise of real iPhones Sent a fake what to do;
- Drivers are categorized as workers;
- Syrup to strengthen the immune system (in a jar in the form of a bear);
- You are a person who wants to achieve more than others;
- How to organize an event;
- When discounts start in spring;
- Telesem magazine: getting married is unbearable;
- When is the day of a cadre worker in Russia Day of cadre workers;