Does NLMK cover up its tracks? Personnel changes in the two largest metallurgical companies Kolesov Dmitry Nikolaevich Severstal

Nobody will argue that Vladimir Lisin managed to build his own metallurgical empire called NLMK, which is based on the Novolipetsk Iron and Steel Works, a world-class enterprise that is distinguished high technology And high profits from business. Moreover, this enterprise was famous back in the years of the USSR: here, for the first time in the world, they mastered continuous casting of steel, the first in the Soviet Union - the production of anisotropic electrical steel using their own unique technology, and so on ...

Billionaire doesn't look like a raider

But that's all in the past.
It is much more important today that, despite the hard times of Perestroika and other troubles, Vladimir Lisin managed to create the most profitable and effective world production. His NLMK Group is a vertically integrated company, a leader among world producers of the highest quality steel. The company provides efficient and profitable production thanks to the concentration of raw materials and steel production facilities in low-cost regions. Finished products is manufactured in close proximity to consumers located in Russia, the EU countries and North America.

However, NLMK has recently begun to flicker more and more often in a completely different context - a criminal one, up to accusations of trying to raider capture one office building in Moscow. And although most likely Vladimir Lisin himself does not know anything about this story, nevertheless, both his name and the name of the company he created in the context of a detective story sound often and very negatively.
This unpleasant criminal story around NLMK is so overdue that its participants from the pages of the Kommersant newspaper (dated July 09, 2018) have already directly addressed the President of Russia.
And this is what they write:

Letter to President Vladimir Putin

"Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!
We appeal to you as the guarantor of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in connection with encroachments on the property of a small business enterprise - EuroStroy LLC.
At the heart of the conflict is the trial of embezzlement of 3.1 billion rubles from NLMK PJSC. during construction in 2008–2010 blast furnace No. 7. The heads of contractor firms and NLMK employees were initially brought to criminal responsibility. For more than 2 years, this case has been considered by the Levoberezhny District Court of Lipetsk, and it has also been talked about in the media (for example, “The case of an expert came out of the blast furnace” in Kommersant, 04/27/2018, “Victims without guilt” in Industrial Weekly, 02/26/2018 ). Over the years of the trial, the list of defendants has been reduced to one person - Vladimir Viktorovich Biryukov, which looks strange given the large-scale scam. The persons involved in the theft "disappear" from the case, no active steps are taken to search for those involved.
It also looks strange that traces of the stolen billions could not be found. At the same time, the media (including Forbes) inform about apartments and cottages in Miami and Russia, multimillion-dollar accounts in foreign banks.
Moreover, the Moscow lawyers representing the interests of NLMK within the framework of the criminal case ... refused a civil claim, that is, from compensation for damages. But they concentrated their efforts on seizing the building belonging to EuroStroy, which is located in Moscow. Neither EvroStroy nor its participants had anything to do with the theft. All claims are based on the testimony of Biryukov, which he (without bearing any responsibility for this and as if by agreement) gave against the person involved in the case, who has already died and cannot answer anything and who once upon a time was a co-owner of EuroStroy LLC.
Without waiting for the end of the criminal process in Lipetsk, lawyers hired by NLMK file a civil lawsuit to recover the building of EuroStroy LLC in the Krasnodar court. And they manage to start enforcement proceedings in Krasnodar in relation to Moscow property for a crime that took place in Lipetsk. The "Krasnodar branch" of this story deserves a separate investigation altogether!
Another oddity: the public prosecutor in Lipetsk asks the court to assign the accused only ... 4 years of probation and remove the arrest from his property! What NLMK representative does not object to! It looks more than strange. As well as another fact: Olga Gritskevich, who received 9 million rubles for an examination of damage, was detained on charges of actually embezzling these budget funds.
The question involuntarily arises: what is it - gaps in the legislation or an attempt of a raider seizure through the abuse of the right? Although the 1990s are already behind us... At the same time, we are sure that the management of NLMK and Vladimir Lisin personally are not aware of what is happening behind his back.
In general, without intervention in this matter, the law does not seem to prevail!
Sincerely, CEO and a member of EuroStroy LLC O.M. Dudarek."

Such is the letter. When you read it, it's hard to believe that this is possible today. However, as it turns out, this is indeed real story, in which respectable owners are trying to take away their property. Under the condition of complete connivance on the part of the prosecutor's supervision, "behind the scenes" conspiracies, exorbitant greed and resourcefulness.

Let's try to figure out what happened there and how it happened that, under the mute of one theft, they really don’t really want to investigate it, but they want to take someone else’s property!

After spending a little, analyzing official documents, statements, comparing facts and conclusions, newspaper publications and essays, we can draw certain conclusions. By the way, information about the progress of the case and the interim decisions made can be obtained on the official websites of the Levoberezhny District Court of the city of Lipetsk, the Leninsky District Court of Krasnodar and higher authorities. That's if it's interesting!

And what is the salt?

Immediately about the conclusions, which are disappointing: it showed that, using the protracted trial in Lipetsk as a "legal scrap", a group of people is implementing the scenario of a quiet raider seizure of someone else's property. At the same time, voluntarily or involuntarily, they are supported by individual representatives of the law enforcement system of Lipetsk and Krasnodar with the complete self-elimination of the prosecutor's office.

Now - in more detail about what exactly is happening.

And what is happening is that the lawyers of the Reznik, Gagarin and Partners Law Office, acting in the process of embezzlement of NLMK funds on behalf of the company and hiding behind the law, systematically seize the property of a small business enterprise - EuroStroy LLC. This is the main plot that emerges through the heap of court hearings, statements, petitions, testimonies, lawsuits, and so on.

At the heart of the conflict - as stated in a letter to Vladimir Putin - theft from PJSC "NLMK" big money during the construction of blast furnace No. 7 "Rossiyanka" in 2008-2010 (the only one of its kind in Russia). The non-standard construction history itself helped to steal so much, since it was the first blast furnace built in the Russian Federation in the last 25 years and at the same time the most important object of the NLMK technical re-equipment program. The total investment in the construction of the furnace, the recycling CHPP and their infrastructure amounted to 43 billion rubles. And a criminal group (it included both contractors and NLMK employees) was able to "take away" several billion of this money. Where exactly - the investigation did not establish. Officially, it does not know this until now! Either he knows, but he doesn't want to speak out loud. For your own reasons.

In general, billions of rubles seem to have evaporated!

How defendants "disappear" from the NLMK case

To criminal liability under part 4 of article 159 and paragraph "b" part 4 of article 174.1. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation initially involved the heads of a number of contractors and employees of NLMK. One of those involved - the head of the subcontractor CJSC "Trest Yuzhstalkonstruktsiya" Omarov Ruslan Yusupovich died at the time. And right there (as is often the case in high-profile criminal cases), they decided to "hang" all responsibility for the theft on him. It is interesting that the accusations against Omarov are based only on the testimony of Vladimir Biryukov - the same Biryukov who remained the only defendant in the case. And who during the process leads a free life (for example, being under investigation, he travels wherever he wants, changes his place of registration, spends on himself as much as he wants, etc.). In any case, the testimony of this man should hardly be considered the ultimate truth.

Moreover, as it was already said in the letter addressed to the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, during this time the list of the accused was reduced to one person - Vladimir Biryukov. Any objective lawyer will say that with such a large-scale scam, this is a reason to open a new case ...
In general, Vladimir Biryukov was the only one left. But at first, after all, there were other defendants in the case, who mysteriously “disappeared” from it along the way. But they were very remarkable characters!

We do not take kickbacks!

For example, NLMK's top manager, capital construction director Vladimir Sizov, who, according to the investigation, assisted NLMK in embezzling Money. This man simply stopped appearing in court. He seems to have been put on the wanted list, but, in fact, no active steps are being taken either to search for him or to search for the property he obtained by criminal means. And along the way, somehow they try not to talk about it at all. He seems to be running...

Also "disappeared" from the case, the general director of LLC "TPS" Vladimir Nefedov, through which, according to the investigation, Vladimir Biryukov cashed out money and transferred "kickbacks" to the management of the plant (almost a hint from Mr. Lisin himself, although it is hard to imagine Lisin taking "kickbacks" from stolen goods from him!) and received cash mediation funds. By the way, Vladimir Biryukov does not object to the role of Vladimir Nefedov interpreted in this way. However, Nefedov is being "taken out" of the case! The motive is due to the expiration of the term for bringing to responsibility, which became possible due to the reclassification of his actions to a completely different corpus delicti - "illegal banking." Although, judging by the numerous testimonies of witnesses, his main role was to help cash out and get kickbacks for NLMK employees. Any law school graduate will see in this retraining a professional trick (in which it is also easy to find corpus delicti!), aimed at exemption from punishment.

And the most significant figure in the beginning (but at the same time very quickly removed from the charges) was, of course, the first vice president and general director of NLMK PJSC Igor Nikolayevich Anisimov. It was he, according to a law enforcement officer who wished to remain anonymous, who received the main kickbacks from the money stolen during the construction of the furnace.

An amazing metamorphosis happened to Igor Anisimov: it was as if he was deleted from the actors, as if there was no person at all in that situation, and allegedly he did not sign contracts and all construction documents, he did not accept "imaginary" volumes construction works, he did not give instructions on the implementation of "left" payments. And although the documents bear his signature, but as if by magic, Anisimov died - Biryukov is to blame for everything. And Biryukov obediently nods: "I'm to blame for everything. Only there's nothing to take from me, but where the billions have gone - I don't know!"
The topic of stolen and never found billions is a special issue.

Where did the billions go?

So, the investigation never found the money stolen from Vladimir Lisin. No trace! And this despite the fact that almost all the persons involved (who are wanted and excluded from the case) are very wealthy people. However, it seems that these facts are of little interest to the investigation and the prosecutor's office.

And you don't even have to look for it. So, for example, Forbs openly writes that in 2012 (precisely during the period of the theft), Igor Anisimov purchased three apartments in Miami (USA) with a total value of about 7.5 million US dollars. He owns two apartments in the Trump Tower II condominium, and another apartment with a total area of ​​​​almost 300 square meters. m with three bathrooms, three bedrooms and a living room is located in the Bal Harbor luxury condominium on the Atlantic coast. By the way, money laundering through the acquisition of luxury real estate is one of the most common forms of legalization of stolen funds.

Vladimir Biryukov himself is also far from poor. He owns, among other things, two apartments in Moscow (more than 90 sq. m on 3rd Tverskaya-Yamskaya street and more than 150 sq. m on Grizodubova street), as well as land plot(over 1700 sq. m.) and a cottage (over 550 sq. m.) in the Istra district of the Moscow region. It is noteworthy that at first the Lipetsk court seized the Biryukovskaya apartments, and then removed them.
There is also information about cash in its purest form. Only during the construction of that same blast furnace, to Vladimir Biryukov’s personal account at Citibank London N.A. received more than 300 million rubles, which he successfully spent, withdrawing cash, buying expensive jewelry, transferring multimillion-dollar funds to his foreign assets in the UK and the Swiss Confederation. He also gambled frequently and with varying degrees of success through the World Derivatives trade brokerage firm.

Found something to cover up!

It turns out that all the funds stolen from NLMK ended up abroad and in Russia in the form of apartments, plots, shares and cottages. At the same time, the investigation and the prosecutor's office did not even try to search for the property of the defendants, acquired with the stolen goods from the plant.

What do they do so that at least outwardly it looks like a search for the stolen? To cover up your own inaction, or an action of a completely different direction and other interests?

And here's what: not finding (or not wanting to find) any traces of the stolen property, the lawyers of NLMK PJSC from the Reznik, Gagarin and Partners Law Office concentrated their efforts on seizing the building owned by EuroStroy LLC, which is located in Moscow . Let's put it this way: real estate is real estate, that it stands still - you can't hide it abroad, and you can't put it in your pocket.

The Internet is filled with statements by EuroStroy, articles by Lipetsk journalists, letters and other documents from which one can draw an unambiguous conclusion: neither the EuroStroy company itself, nor its participants (and claims are made both against the company itself and against its participant and leader) had nothing to do with the theft of funds from NLMK and do not have. Otherwise, figuratively speaking, why would they ring the bells and write to all authorities?

And they strike all the bells and ring all the bells, because the legal grounds are on their side, this is obvious. After all, if indeed that building was somehow involved in a criminal scheme, it would be seized without much ceremony. The fact that for several years the claims have been "trampling around" in one place is perhaps the most striking confirmation that the history here is clearly unclean.

"Guiltless Victims"

That is exactly what (with a reference to the great play by playwright Alexander Ostrovsky) is the title of one of the articles devoted to the analysis of the Lipetsk case and the attempts of a raider seizure "on the sly" of a Moscow office building.

For several years now, EvroStroy has been forced to actively deal with this case, participate in lawsuits in Lipetsk and Krasnodar, write endless letters, protests, explanations, point out a large number of violations when accepting statements of claim and considering court cases and enforcement cases related to this story. productions (and there are already several of them!), to protest the arrests of property alternating one by one, to spend time and money on travel and on lawyers, which is obviously a significant expense. Of course, they would be glad not to do this, since they have nothing to do with the essence of the matter, but it is quite obvious: if they weaken their resistance, the building will "leak" from them to the new owners. But who are the true interests of this capture is a special question and so far unanswered.

There are practically no grounds for claims to the property of EuroStroy LLC from the lawyers of the Reznik, Gagarin and Partners Law Office: part of this property once belonged to one of the defendants in the embezzlement case at NLMK. However, he sold it long before that. And now the conscientious owner of this property, represented by a member of EuroStroy LLC, must "fend off" unjustified attempts to seize property just because it once belonged to a person who later turned out to be involved in some kind of scam.

NLMK's lawyers, including Roman Gennadievich Nikitin, are trying to convince numerous authorities that this property has become a form of payment to one of the participants in the crime - as if part of his share of the stolen property. A simple comparison of dates and circumstances that neither the investigators, nor NLMK's lawyers, nor the prosecutor's office want to talk about, shows the absurdity of this version. There are other legal grounds for recognizing the nullity of such a thesis. Nevertheless, lawsuits filed by NLMK's lawyers are accepted and considered by the courts.

Absurd? Undoubtedly! But under the multivolume statements of claim, under the pressure of many petitions, certificates, requests, etc. the essence of the case is already poorly visible, and the legal and procedural shaft in itself becomes an imaginary legal basis for further claims. The hands of state bodies commit actions aimed at the illegal appropriation of property. And law-abiding owners, from whom they are trying to chop off property, are trying to be eliminated from the consideration of the case. That is, they want to take away property, while refusing justice.

Krasnodar raider trick

At the same time, what is very important and what is also discussed in the letter to Putin, the lawyers are implementing an original scheme: they transfer the consideration of the issue of a mansion in Moscow from Lipetsk to Krasnodar. That is, in Lipetsk the civil lawsuit is dropped, and in Krasnodar (where they seem to have a very intimate relationship with the court), a similar civil lawsuit is being filed. You can easily find out about the "intricate" judicial movements in this case by contacting the official websites of the Krasnodar district (Oktyabrsky and Leninsky) and regional courts, as well as on the website of the Moscow Arbitration, where there are judicial acts.

A reasonable question arises: why transfer part of the case to another region when the main case is in Lipetsk and the process is already nearing completion? A logical conclusion suggests itself: if the NLMK party (those very lawyers) had handled the case "cleanly", then in the course of legal proceedings they would have defended the interests of the client in Lipetsk.
It turns out that they went to Krasnodar to defend completely different interests: it seems that they are their own! By the way, it is probably not by chance that the Reznik, Gagarin and Partners Law Office has its representative office in the city of Krasnodar, and it is there that cases are resolved in their favor. At the same time, the lawyers again do not want to look for Biryukov's property, but they are pressing hard with a demand to withdraw the Moscow building!

Stole a billion - get a suspended sentence!

By the way, the local Lipetsk media reveal in sufficient detail the peculiarities and oddities of this case. They have long concluded that the criminal prosecution itself has declined, because for embezzling from 1.9 to 3.1 billion rubles to Vladimir Biryukov, the state prosecutor in Lipetsk, Nina Ivanovna Goncharova, asks the court for only ... four years of probation! At the same time, she actively insists on maintaining the legalization episode, which provides the basis for encroachments on Moscow property (that is, the building allegedly became a form of payment for criminal participation).

It is noteworthy that the representative of the plant supports the state prosecutor, and does not demand a fair punishment for Vladimir Biryukov. You can draw an elementary analogy: for example, the notorious ex-minister Ulyukaev was sentenced by the court to 8 years of strict regime and a fine in the amount of a single bribe - 130.4 million rubles. At the same time, the court arrested 15 objects of his real estate and at least 564 million rubles. Prosecutor Boris Neporozhny requested ten years in a strict regime colony for Ulyukaev and the maximum possible fine under the law - 500 million rubles.

And in the Lipetsk case, the prosecutor's office seems to be on the side of the defense of the accused and for the theft of 1.9 to 3.1 billion rubles. asks for a minimum (and, moreover, conditional) term. Moreover, he does not object to the removal of arrests from the property of suspects.

Historical legal paradox

There is no doubt that over time this case of embezzlement of several billion rubles (!), which rested on the desire to seize someone else's property, whose value is not even 5% of the amount stolen, will go down in history as one of the most absurd and ridiculous. And every month the number of "oddities" in it only grows.
Thus, expert Olga Gritskevich was recently detained in Moscow on charges of embezzlement of 9 million rubles. budgetary funds (this is also described in a letter sent personally to Vladimir Putin in search of justice through the Kommersant newspaper), which she received from the Lipetsk investigators of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for conducting an examination just in this case. According to her assessment, the damage amounted to more than 3 billion rubles, for which her Center for Independent Expertise and Assessment LLC received an unheard-ofly large fee from the budget.

The next oddity was the "Krasnodar branch" of this story, which must be said in more detail and separately! The Leninsky and Oktyabrsky courts of the city of Krasnodar have already been noted for making several "strange" decisions, and the Krasnodar judges for their luxurious weddings!

The competence of the judges of the Leninsky District Court - Marina Nikolaevna Shipunova and Roman Gennadyevich Zhmetkin, the judges of the Oktyabrsky District Court Alexander Vladimirovich Zelensky, the judges of the Krasnodar Regional Court Vladimir Fedorovich Kislyak, Roman Vladimirovich Shakitko, Andrey Viktorovich Kudinov, Maria Vladimirovna Dementeeva are summoned by specialists familiar with this case, huge doubts. Surely it will not hurt at least a check by the qualification board of judges of their professional suitability and knowledge of the law. It also does not hurt to check their well-being. And civil case No. 2-6276/17 on the claim of NLMK PJSC against Biryukov V.V., Dudarka O.M., Ataev Z.K. It would not hurt to take special control. It is not clear where the chairman of the Krasnodar Regional Court Alexander Dmitrievich Chernov is looking in this story.

It also requires verification of the legality of the actions of the Krasnodar bailiff Mikhail Nikolaevich Vlasenko, who initiated enforcement proceedings against Vladimir Viktorovich Biryukov, while not making any attempts to search for and arrest his property, but, by a strange coincidence, also directed his sight at the property of EuroStroy LLC ". Supervisory and control authorities have something to study in the already rich Krasnodar annals of this case.

And this would be exactly the case if the competent authorities, instead of observing the rule of law, did not arrange a bureaucratic game, sending replies to numerous complaints and appeals. Apparently, it was no coincidence that Muscovite Vladimir Biryukov, while investigating the theft in Lipetsk, suddenly became a resident of Krasnodar for several months, where he actually never moved, but only flew in court hearings. At the same time, this is what worries me: in Krasnodar, an exclusively one-sided position is developing on this story, obviously not in accordance with the law and aimed at facilitating the illegal seizure of the property of EuroStroy LLC (which, we recall, is located in Moscow!).

And now seriously!

Sooner or later, this entire legal mess will receive an objective assessment, and criminal case No. 1-55/2017 on charges of Vladimir Biryukov of embezzling funds from NLMK PJSC during the construction of blast furnace No. 7 in the amount of 3053307320.14 rubles. will be taken under special control. Because there is too much heaped up in it lawlessness and injustice! And this despite the fact that year after year the country's leadership, headed by Vladimir Putin, is working to strengthen the triumph of justice, protect the interests of small and medium-sized businesses, and counteract raider and other illegal seizures of other people's property.

In the meantime, the top leadership has not taken up the task of restoring order in this story (and there is no doubt that when it does, everything will be decided very quickly and justice will come as quickly as in other stories where Vladimir Putin directly restores order), there are much more questions here than answers!

Here are just the main ones!

For example, how legally did the defendants “disappear” from this case one by one? Who and how orders such expensive examinations, which are then qualified as embezzlement of budgetary funds? How did the investigation investigate such a major case for more than 3 years and still not be able to find traces of the kidnapped? Does the management of NLMK know that their lawyers, in order to get at least something, are waging a tense struggle for property, which has absolutely nothing to do with it, and bring civil suits against third parties who are not related to the crime, and do not try to recover from persons, committed a crime?

The president Russian Federation Vladimir Putin has repeatedly drawn attention to the creation of conditions for the development of small businesses in the country. And this implies, first of all, legal security. But what kind of legal protection can we talk about when the supervisory authority - the prosecutor's office, with its strange and thoughtless position, gives the small business property belonging to persons not involved in the commission of the crime into the hands of such large structure and does not want to pay attention to the circumstances that testify to the artificiality and unreliability of the synchronized actions of Vladimir Biryukov and the lawyers of NLMK PJSC?!
However, there is every reason to think that the letter to Vladimir Putin will reach the addressee. And that the next chapter of this story will be about how they put things in order and how justice prevailed!

Why are there no answers?

Apparently, representatives of EuroStroy LLC wrote a huge number of appeals to government bodies, including both in the above letter and through the media. So in a number of articles about this case there are appeals to the following authorities: 1. The Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. 2. Supreme Court Russian Federation. 3. Commissioner of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 4. Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. 5. Commissioner for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in the city of Moscow. 6. Commissioner under the President of the Russian Federation for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs. 7. Krasnodar Regional Court. 8. Central Office Federal Service bailiffs of the Russian Federation. 9. Office of the Federal Bailiffs Service of Russia for the Krasnodar Territory. 10. The Prosecutor's Office of the Krasnodar Territory. 11. Prosecutor's office of the Lipetsk region. 12. PJSC NLMK. Etc…

Where are the answers? Apparently, everything slows down for a reason. And instead of defending the interests of conscientious entrepreneurs, local lawmen turn a blind eye to the disappearance of the perpetrators from the case, do not search for foreign assets and try in every possible way to mitigate the charge.

And in this case, it seems, the final will not come soon - too much twisted!

We will conclude this essay with another quote from a letter to Vladimir Putin: "Without intervention in this matter, the law does not seem to prevail!"

NLMK Group, an international steel company with assets in Russia, the US and the EU, announces the appointment of Anatoly Khebnev as Vice President for Procurement and Dmitry Kolesov as Vice President for Repair Management System at NLMK Group.
The position of Vice President for Repair Management System has been created in NLMK Group for the first time. Since 2016, Dmitry Kolesov has worked in the company as a director for planning and organization of repairs.
Anatoly Khebnev has served as Deputy Vice President for Procurement at NLMK Group since 2012. The Purchasing Vice President was Bridgesh Garg, who moved to the newly created position of Director of Purchasing for NLMK International, management company foreign assets of NLMK Group.
“In less than five years, Brijesh Garg created one of best services supplies in the Russian metallurgy - almost all key processes were automated, the centralization of purchases of global categories of materials and raw materials began, and the order processing time decreased many times over. Bridgesh will now have to extend the Group's successful experience to its overseas assets. The main task of Anatoly Khebnev in new position- further centralization of purchases and, as a result, optimization of the company's expenses in this direction. Dmitry Kolesov as vice president will be responsible for implementing advanced equipment condition management systems and improving efficiency repair work at the Group's enterprises,” commented Oleg Bagrin, President of NLMK Group, on the appointments.
Biography of Anatoly Hebnev
Anatoly Khebnev has been with NLMK Group since 2005. Managed the control inspection of the company, the management of the implementation of integrated information system SAP ERP. Since 2012, he has served as Deputy Vice President for Procurement. Prior to joining NLMK Group, he held executive positions in St. Petersburg companies. Graduated from the Baltic State Technical University with a degree in Pulsed Thermal Engines and the St. Petersburg International Institute of Management with a degree in National Economics and Law. Has an MBA degree.
Biography of Brijesh Garg
Bridgesh Garg has served as NLMK Group's Vice President of Procurement since April 2012. Began labor activity in 1985 at Tata Steel (India) as a production engineer. Subsequently, he held various positions in this company, as well as at the metallurgical enterprises of New-Zealand Steel (BlueScope Steel, Australia) and ArcelorMittal, Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
He has 19 years of experience in supply chain management and business process reengineering at large steel plants. He has 13 years of industrial engineering experience.
Has a bachelor's degree technical sciences in Industrial Engineering, is a Certified SAP Solutions Consultant and is CPIM (Production and Inventory Management) certified by the American Manufacturing and Inventory Control Society (APICS)
Biography of Dmitry Kolesov
Dmitry Kolesov has been with NLMK Group since June 2016. He began his career in the companies of the mining and metallurgical industry in 1998. Since 2005 has been executive director Almaty plant of heavy engineering, since 2006, for five years, he headed the SSM-Tyazhmash enterprise. From 2013 until joining NLMK, he held leadership positions at the United Aircraft Corporation.
Dmitry Kolesov graduated from the Cherepovets State Industrial Institute with a degree in Material Handling, Construction and Road Machinery and Equipment and from St. Petersburg State Technical University with a degree in Management.

LLC "Corporation of Ferrous Metals Producers" together with the Cherepovets Metallurgical Plant of PJSC "Severstal" on March 1-2, 2017 in Cherepovets held the next (ninth) industry seminar-meeting of managers and specialists of repair services of mining and metallurgical enterprises. The work was attended by 137 specialists representing 64 enterprises and organizations from Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus.

Companies and enterprises of the industry were represented by participants of a high professional level. Among them: Kolesov Dmitry Nikolayevich - Vice President for the Repair Management System of NLMK PJSC, Frolov Alexander Alexandrovich - Director of Repairs of METINVEST HOLDING LLC, Dobrodey Sergey Alekseevich - Director of Repairs of the Severstal Russian Steel Division of PJSC Severstal , Klimov Mikhail Borisovich - General Director of Pechengastroy LLC.

Vadim Evgenievich Germanov, General Director of the Severstal Russian Steel Division of PJSC Severstal, delivered a welcoming speech.

The seminar was also attended by managers and leading specialists of heavy engineering plants, manufacturers lubricants and bearings. Firms engaged in further improvement of systems were widely represented technical diagnostics and repair of industrial electronics.

It was noted at the seminar that companies pay great attention to solving the problems of maintaining fixed assets.

The industry has accumulated significant potential, both intellectual and logistical. Real measures are taken to ensure efficient, trouble-free operation of the equipment when minimal cost labor and material resources.

Underway permanent job to improve organizational structures repair departments. In recent years, the number of repair personnel at the enterprises of the industry has decreased by 25-40%. At a number of metallurgical enterprises, on the basis of repair services, service repair services or repair directorates have been created, which are removed from the main workshops, but are directly subordinate to the enterprise (PJSC Severstal, PJSC NLMK, etc.), at other OJSC MMK ”, JSC “NLMK-Ural”, PrJSC “MK “Azovstal”, PrJSC “MMK im. Ilyich” and others were withdrawn from the enterprise and on the basis of the repair services of these enterprises independent structural repair divisions were created (OOO United Service Company of OJSC MMK, LLC ZITR, LLC Metinvest Promservis). At the same time, there is a tendency to restore workshop repair services and the Offices of the Chief Mechanic and Chief Power Engineer (JSC EVRAZ NTMK, JSC EVRAZ ZSMK, PJSC Tulachermet).

02/03/2017 Pavel Shilyaev, General Director of OJSC Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works, signed documents on new personnel appointments.

Sergei Ushakov, who previously worked as Deputy General Director of OJSC MMK for commerce, has been appointed to the position of Deputy General Director of OJSC MMK for Production.

Sergey Nikolayevich began his career at MMK in 1991 as a steel caster at the CCC, went through all the stages of production from a shift foreman, section foreman, deputy head, shop foreman, chief blast-furnace operator, to MMK's chief engineer. An important milestone in the career of any production worker is the position of shop manager. Sergey Nikolayevich successively headed the CCC and ESPC. And in 2009 he became the General Director of the MMK Metalurji metallurgical plant in Turkey, then he headed OJSC MMK-METIZ. In 2014, he headed the United Service Company (OSK LLC).

Sergey Laskov, Deputy General Director of OAO MMK for Production, will head OOO OSK. Sergey Alekseevich began working at MMK in 2001 as a senior thermal engineer for rolled products and pipes at Rolling Shop No. 6, before that, after graduating from Moscow State Medical Institute in 1985, he worked for 16 years in the Stavropol Territory. At MMK, Sergey Alekseevich has held the positions of deputy head of the coatings shop, head of the sheet-rolling shop No. 5, head of the sheet-rolling shop No. 11, deputy chief engineer of the MMK and director of labor protection, industrial safety and ecology.

Sergei Nenashev, who previously worked as the director for labor protection, industrial safety and ecology of OJSC MMK, is starting to perform the duties of the head of the commercial unit of the plant.

Sergey Nenashev began his career at MMK Group in 2007 as Director of OOO Magnitogorsky service center". In 2011, he concurrently became the head of CJSC MR-1. In 2015, after the integration of enterprises into the United Service Company, he was appointed director of OJSC MMK for labor protection, industrial safety and the environment.

Director of LLC "OSK" Alexander Mukhin will head technical department plant. After graduating from the Moscow State Medical Institute in 1995, Alexander Mukhin came to the MMK in the rolling mill No. 5 as a cold metal cutter. He was a shift supervisor, a senior foreman, a section head, a deputy head of the LPTs No. 9. In 2010, he was the head of the HPC No. 5, and then headed the HPC No. 11. For the last two years, he headed the United Service Company.

A new appointment awaits Grigory Shchurov. Grigory Viktorovich began his career at MMK in 1999 in the department of new technologies, worked as a head of a bureau, a head of a group, a deputy head of a workshop in various structures of the plant. In 2008, he became the head of HPC No. 7. Worked in technological management plant in the positions of deputy head, head of department. In 2013 became technical director JSC "MMK", and then headed the technical department of the plant. Now Grigory Viktorovich will take the position of director for labor protection, industrial safety and ecology of OJSC MMK.

Commenting on these appointments, P. Shilyaev, General Director of OJSC MMK, noted: “The current rotations are largely aimed at developing human resources leaders. In this case, you can see the strategic goals. The change of the head of the production block of the enterprise reflects the company's course towards the development of metallurgical processing. It is known that there are two main profiles in Magnitogorsk - metallurgical and rolling. Sergei Ushakov is not only one of the most experienced managers, but also an excellent specialist in the metallurgical process. In turn, the program for the next few years includes the modernization of production facilities. Here is Sergey Laskov's experience in leadership largest company The group will be the most in demand, because behind him is the construction and commissioning of the 2000 cold rolling mill complex. Alexander Mukhin's managerial talent will be realized in a new direction for him - the formation of MMK's technical policy. I am sure that Grigory Shchurov will be able to successfully solve one of the most difficult tasks - the implementation of the policy in the field of labor protection and ecology, and to solve it in close connection with the technical policy of the plant. Sergei Nenashev will have to take responsibility for one of the most significant vectors of the plant's development - commercial. I congratulate my colleagues on their new appointments and sincerely wish them further success in their new positions."

In turn, NLMK Group announces the appointment of Anatoly Khebnev as Vice President for Procurement and Dmitry Kolesov as Vice President for Repair Management System.

The position of Vice President for Repair Management System was created for the first time in NLMK Group. Since 2016, Dmitry Kolesov has worked in the company as a director for planning and organization of repairs.

Anatoly Khebnev has served as Deputy Vice President for Procurement at NLMK Group since 2012. Purchasing VP was Bridgesh Garg, who moved to the newly created position of Director of Purchasing for NLMK International, the management company for NLMK Group's overseas assets.

“In less than five years, Brijesh Garg has created one of the best supply services in the Russian metallurgy - almost all key processes have been automated, procurement of global categories of materials and raw materials has begun to centralize, and order processing times have decreased many times over. Bridgesh now has to extend the group's successful experience to its overseas assets. The main task of Anatoly Khebnev in his new position is the further centralization of purchases and, as a result, the optimization of the company's expenses in this direction. Dmitry Kolesov, as vice president, will be responsible for implementing advanced equipment condition management systems and improving the efficiency of repair work at the group's enterprises,” commented Oleg Bagrin, president of the NLMK group, on the appointment.

Anatoly Khebnev has been with the NLMK Group since 2005. He was in charge of the company's control inspection and the implementation of the SAP ERP integrated information system. Since 2012, he has held the position of Deputy Vice President for Procurement. Prior to joining the NLMK Group, he held senior positions in St. Petersburg companies. Graduated from the Baltic State Technical University with a degree in Pulsed Thermal Engines and the St. Petersburg International Institute of Management with a degree in National Economics and Law. Has an MBA degree.

Brijesh Garg has worked as Vice President for Procurement at NLMK Group since April 2012. He started his career in 1985 at Tata Steel (India) as a Production Engineer. Subsequently, he held various positions in this company, as well as at the metallurgical enterprises of New-Zealand Steel (BlueScope Steel, Australia) and ArcelorMittal, Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
He has 19 years of experience in supply chain management and business process reengineering at large steel plants. He has 13 years of industrial engineering experience. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering, is a Certified SAP Solutions Consultant, and holds a CPIM (Production and Inventory Management) certification from the American Industrial Inventory Control Society (APICS).

Dmitry Kolesov has been with NLMK Group since June 2016. He began his career in the mining and metallurgical industry in 1998. Since 2005, he has been the Executive Director of the Almaty Heavy Engineering Plant, and since 2006, he has been managing SSM-Tyazhmash for five years ". From 2013 until joining NLMK, he held senior positions at the United Aircraft Corporation. Dmitry Kolesov graduated from the Cherepovets State Industrial Institute with a degree in Material Handling, Construction and Road Machinery and Equipment and from St. Petersburg State Technical University with a degree in Management.

 

It might be useful to read:

• Internet via mobile phone - All options How to set up Internet using your phone;
• What does the letter r mean on the phone;
• Lamp and chimney - literary magazine - Prose;
• Do we need LTE technology?;
• What makes a good photo?;
• See what "Bret Hart" is in other dictionaries;
• What is LTE (4G) in a smartphone What is the difference between 4g and lte in a smartphone;
• Night unlimited on Tele2 "Night Drive" service from Tele2;