The difference between 1c upp and erp. Switching from SCP to ERP: when and why it is advisable to do it. International financial accounting

It covers almost all aspects of accounting and management, creating a single information space for the company. But the product is no longer optimal due to the peculiarities of modern business, and therefore needs a successor. It was the system (Enterprice Resourse Planning) - a new round in the development of corporate solutions from 1C. This is a full-fledged replacement for 1C: UPP, which will disappear from the developer's virtual shelves as early as April 30, 2018.

Easier and better

The 1C: ERP system was originally designed to work in the "thin client" mode, and therefore it scales perfectly and is more productive than its predecessor thanks to the new three-tier architecture. There is support for working in a browser without installing clients, which significantly saves money on maintaining remote servers.
An important place in the design is given to the ease of operation of the end user. The developers were guided by two key principles: "no unfinished or controversial functionality" and "too complex, inconvenient and rarely used elements are not needed by anyone."

Complete customer focus

The developers of the system have completely moved away from the method of making pinpoints, focusing on the end business goals of most customers. As a result, a completely new development algorithm was created, where the ultimate goal is realized, and not individual elements are tweaked. In fact, the well-known principle of Henry Ford was taken as a basis, which argued: in order to move faster, you need not a more playful horse, but a technical revolution. Everything is the same here, but less pretentious.

The reporting system is thought out to the smallest detail and sharpened for a specific use case - take it and make it up. In this system, there is simply no objectively useless functions and details that greatly burdened the 1C: UPP starting interface, where you had to get rid of unnecessary windows, plugins and add-ons. Everything is simple and minimalistic. You need to install an extension or add a few details to general scheme? A couple of minutes of free time solves the problem.

Functional development

In order for you to get the right impression about the system, you need to know that it surpasses the SCP in at least ten key indicators, although it was created from scratch, and was not a planned upgrade of the previous product.

Among the main advantages, it is worth highlighting:

management of purchases and sales - flexible pricing, as well as work with discounts, payment schedule and mutual settlements. The interface is as clear as possible for the seller and is free from "accounting" habits;
inventory management - the functionality has been completely redesigned and brought to perfection;
production planning - management is implemented taking into account "bottlenecks", which allows you to effectively solve the assigned tasks, starting from your own shortcomings;
cost calculation - no pitfalls and automatically closes at the end of the month;
accounting production costs - became easier, although slightly lost in flexibility. But he won in the speed and accuracy of data processing;
budgeting is an ideal tool that each business can tailor to its own needs.

Now for the new features that the SCP simply did not have:

warehouse management - targeted content of goods based on WMS support;
the order system of the warehouse operation is smart, simple and obedient;
planning of delivery of goods "supplier - client" with transport management;
report panels - beyond praise;
automatic mailing by email, including notifications, payment status confirmations and reports.

Needless to say, basic ERP is head and shoulders above SCP, despite its many years of improvements since its release.

Ambitious prospects

The functionality develops at the speed of a locomotive, which took acceleration and stubbornly follows the goal. Developers offer significant updates and additions on a quarterly basis, and minor bugs, shortcomings and bugs are eliminated every week, which is ahead of even the legendary pace of Microsoft product development.

Does it make sense to switch to ERP, or is it worth waiting for a better product? Team 1C does not plan to update the system for several years for one simple reason: there is nothing to improve, since information technologies have hit their logical ceiling. It is much more profitable to support a new product by regularly correcting bugs and introducing new useful features.

Large companies additionally receive a significant bonus in the form of corporate support and software support.

The answer is unequivocal - YES... And the company will gladly help you with this. The main feature of the product that will delight any system administrator who has ever suffered over the installation, configuration and calibration of the system is the cloud client and client-server architecture.

The owner has the ability to access account from anywhere. To log in, you can use a PC, laptop, smartphone or tablet on any OS (Windows, iOS, Android). All data is stored on a secure central server, which is served 24/7 and guarantees the safety of personal information.

Today, data availability decides everything, and therefore we need lion's share large and medium-sized enterprises like air.

The 1C company informed users and partners that from April 30, 2018, the supplies of 1C: UPP and 1C: UPP OR are removed from the price list of 1C and its permanent partners.

Firm "1C" takes into account that a number of users may need to further purchase these software products, for example, it became necessary to increase the number of enterprises of one group, which were previously automated in a typical way on 1C: UPP or 1C: UPP OR. For such cases, the sale of solutions 1C: UPP and 1C: UPP OR starting from 05/01/2018 will be carried out only through partners with the status "1C: Center of Competence for ERP Solutions" (for a list of partners, see www.1c.ru/ ckerp) on applications in the prescribed form with the motivation for the need to purchase 1C: UPP or 1C: UPP OR. When selling in such cases, the partner must notify the user that the solutions 1C: UPP and 1C: UPP OR do not fully comply modern requirements: critical errors are fixed, updates are released, consultations are provided, but the product does not develop, does not use the new features of the 1C: Enterprise 8.3 platform and does not support many new services of 1C.

TRANSITION FROM 1C: UPP TO 1C: ERP

You can switch from 1C: UPP to 1C: ERP solutions on the basis of an upgrade. The user can upgrade from 1C: UPP as on typical solution 1C: ERP and 1C: ERP OR, taking into account the industry specifics of the user's activity. The list of 1C: ERP OR solutions is given in Appendix No. 2.

The cost of the upgrade is calculated according to the standard formula: the total cost of purchased software products (basic delivery plus 1C: Enterprise 8 licenses) minus the cost of the product handed over for the upgrade plus 150 rubles, but not less than half the cost of the purchased set of products. Upgrades to products that include the "1C: ERP Enterprise Management 2" configuration are performed only through partners participating in the "1C: ERP Solutions Competence Center" project, for a list of partners see www.1c.ru/ckerp. Within 45 calendar days after shipment software product under the terms of the upgrade, the partner must transfer to 1C or the distributor who shipped the license agreement for the product being delivered and the security key for the 1C: Enterprise 8 platform, if it was part of the delivered product. Upon receipt of a 1C: ERP set or a 1C: ERP OR set, the user will receive protection keys for the "1C: Enterprise 8" platform, which will also allow to continue working with 1C: UPP or 1C: UPP OR. After performing the upgrade, users of the upgraded products with software protection must delete the license file of the upgraded product from their computer. The materials remaining in the organization from the 1C: UPP or 1C: UPP OR set - protection keys from the 1C: UPP OR configurations, distributions and documentation - should be used only to support old tasks until the transition to 1C: ERP or 1C: ERP OR, without transfer other organizations and individuals, which is indicated in the application for the upgrade signed by the user.

Support for old tasks means the ability to keep records using 1C: UPP or 1C: UPP OR, handed over to the upgrade, and receive support only until the end of the current year in which the upgrade took place, with the possibility of delivery annual reporting... For the operation of 1C: UPP (1C: UPP OR), handed over to the upgrade, you can use the licenses "1C: Enterprise 8" - purchased earlier, purchased together with 1C: ERP (1C: ERP OR) - or buy in addition required amount additional licenses. At the end of the current year, the user has the right to access the databases of these products (one or several) only for the purpose of viewing the previous archived data; new operations are not allowed to be entered.

If the user, when switching from 1C: UPP to 1C: ERP solutions, plans to use the 1C: UPP or 1C: UPP OR software product for a long time with the ability to keep records in them and enter new operations in the programs, then it is recommended to purchase 1C: ERP or 1C: ERP OR without an upgrade or purchase 1C: ERP as part of the 1C: Corporation package (http://v8.1c.ru/corporation) with an upgrade from 1C: UPP (in this case, an extended support period is established, as well as an additional period of use for in the upgrade of products and delivery of components for the upgrade - by the end of the current year at the time of the upgrade, plus one year with the possibility of submitting annual reports).

Users who have upgraded from 1C: UPP revision 1.3 can use the included 1C: ERP transition assistant to transfer reference information and initial balances to the new information base. Salary data can be carried over by movements for the last three years. For automatically created catalog elements, you must specify the missing details. Data transfer instructions are included in the 1C: ERP solution delivery. In version 1C: ERP 2.4.4 (planned release date - April 2018), further development of data exchange mechanisms will be implemented, including the transfer of some documents from 1C: UPP to 1C: ERP ("smooth transition" mode from 1C: UPP to 1C: ERP).

Users of the 1C: ERP product on the website its.1c.ru have access to detailed documentation on this decision electronic.

SUPPORT 1C: UPP AND 1C: UPP OR

Support for 1C: UPP and 1C: UPP OR is currently not terminated. The decision to end their support is planned to be communicated to users and partners in advance - not less than 3 years before the entry into force of such a decision. The identified critical errors in the programs are corrected, configuration updates are released, including in the part of the "Payroll" and "Human Resources" subsystems, and consultations are provided to users if they comply with the maintenance conditions. At the same time, the cost of supporting 1C: UPP is gradually increasing, and support for 1C: UPP OR solutions is carried out only after the 1C: ITS Sectoral service is activated for the solutions used (for more details about the 1C: ITS Sectoral service, see https: // portal .1c.ru / applications / 23).

In an information letter for users and partners No. 22944 dated 04/27/2017, 1C announced a change in the conditions for supporting the 1C: UPP solution. To provide support for users of 1C: UPP, in addition to 1C: ITS, was introduced new service - "Renewal of SCP support". From 01.01.2018, the activation of this service has become a prerequisite to support users of 1C: UPP configuration, and to support users of 1C: UPP OR configurations, it became mandatory to activate the "1C: ITS Industry" service.

From 01.01.2018, partners have the right to provide consulting and other services to users of 1C: UPP and 1C: UPP OR, as well as update the configuration only if there are active services "Renewal of UPP support" (for 1C: UPP) or "1C: ITS Sectoral" (for 1C: UPP OR) - or if the rules of the "Transition period" apply to users.

More details about 1C: UPP support - in information letters No. 22944 dated 04/27/2017 and No. 23229 dated 07/07/2017), about 1C: UPP OR support -

The release of the 1C: ERP solution became a new step in the development of 1C products. We can safely say that they have reached a new level. However, all the advantages of 1C: ERP have a downside - it was developed from scratch, without regard to how similar functions were made in the UPP. Because of this, it will not always be easy for companies already using 1C: UPP to switch to 1C: ERP. In this article I will try to "without cuts" bring out all the pros and cons regarding the transition from SCP to ERP.

Let's start with the main features of 1C: ERP, namely, with technical details, we will gradually move on to aspects that are clear to customers from the business side, and consider back side medals of all innovations.

(The arguments in this article remain relevant when choosing between ERP and an industry-specific PPM solution. More on this in the final section.

When deciding whether to make the transition from the "Trade Management 10.3" configuration to "Trade Management 11", almost all of the above arguments are also relevant, since these solutions correspond to SCP and ERP systems respectively. However, given that "Trade Management 11" was released much earlier than ERP, and has already undergone significant revision based on the wishes of the customer - of these two options, I would recommend even more strongly to choose "Trade Management 11").

Technological advancement

The 1C: ERP system was originally developed to work in the thin client mode. Thus, it scales much better and allows you to achieve significantly more high performance performance than SCP. Also a three-tier client-server architecture with thin client allows you to significantly reduce the cost of scaling, makes it possible to work in a browser, without installing a separate client, allows you to save costs on terminal servers when working remotely.

Emphasis on the ease of use of the program

In the development of 1C: ERP, an important place is taken by ensuring maximum convenience and ease of use for users. On the one hand, this is an absolute plus. On the other hand, the desire to simplify everything as much as possible has led to the fact that users are sometimes surprised to learn about the absence of some elementary things in ERP, to which they are accustomed to in SCP. Why are they missing? There are two popular reasons: the developers of the 1C company might find them too complicated and inconvenient to use; or they might find them "insufficiently methodically elaborated." See the next paragraph for what I mean.

Orientation to a specific method of work

When developing the ERP, the developers of 1C decided to take the following path: instead of fulfilling each user requirement "head-on", they try to understand for the sake of what ultimate business goal this requirement arises. As a result, those requirements are realized, the essence of which is well understood. Also, when implementing, the developers strive not to implement exactly what the customers say, but to understand the ultimate goal and implement it exactly. This is a fairly logical approach, since users do not always understand that their goal can be more easily achieved by other means. As Henry Ford said: "If I asked people what they need, they would ask me to give them a faster horse." As a result, the new 1C product looks very solid, and when you understand its logic of work, there is no need to memorize individual nuances, because everything more or less logically follows from each other and seems intuitive.

Fly in the ointment is as follows - 1C developers do not at all strive to implement business requirements directly, as stated by the users themselves. The most illustrative ERP problem, in my experience, is reporting flaws. Instead of creating a multitude of flexibly customizable reports (which the 1C platform makes it relatively easy to do, and what has to be done at each implementation), 1C developers try to predict which reports are most useful. And they only implement these most useful reports because the presence of many reports makes it difficult to find the ones you need, and the system seems more complex, and they want to make it simple and understandable.

As a result, the system is very pleasant to demonstrate during the sale: reports are well thought out and sharpened for a specific use case, attention is not diverted to secondary reports. But at the beginning of using the system, it is often annoying that there are no elementary reports, which often existed even in the SCP. These reports, perhaps, are not particularly needed. Their benefits are subjective. But when management is already accustomed to analyzing certain data in a certain way, they can be annoyed by the lack of the most basic reports. In this case, 1C developers seem to declare that they are not interested in the subjective opinion of users, but in objective utility. And based on such a thesis, they sometimes stubbornly fail to implement those functions that are not very useful in their subjective opinion. Drawing a parallel with the aforementioned Henry Ford, I note that until the end of his life he stubbornly refused to paint cars other than black.

Functional development programs

In order to get the right impression about the product when you first get acquainted with ERP, you must definitely mention that it significantly surpasses the UPP in the following functions:

* Sales and purchases management - more flexible management of pricing and discounts, management of mutual settlements and payment schedules, more understandable interfaces for sellers (earlier the logic of working with orders was more "accounting").

* Inventory management - redesigned and significantly improved functionality for maintaining inventory and securing orders.

* Production scheduling - implemented planning techniques for "bottlenecks", which makes it much easier and, in many cases, more accurate, more efficient to plan and reschedule production.

* Calculation of the cost price - it works faster, does not stumble on different nuances, because of which closing the month in the UPP was such a painful procedure.

* Cost accounting in production - works easier, especially with the transfer and expense process material costs... Although in terms of flexibility, UPP sometimes loses sometimes (for reasons - see above, ERP developers have not yet been convinced that more flexibility is needed, at the expense of simplicity).

* Flexible Budgeting System - a unique, among all ERP functions, case when the developers, instead of offering a specific methodology, tried to make the most flexible tool that each company can customize.

Added new features that were missing in the SCP

* Warehouse management - address storage of goods is supported. The system has a powerful enough WMS module

* More advanced order scheme of the warehouse

* Transport planning for the delivery of goods from the supplier and to customers

* Assortment management functionality for chain companies

* Report panels (the so-called "Monitor targets") - allows you to implement management according to the Balanced Scorecard method

* And a few more points.

In general, in terms of the total number of functions and functional blocks, ERP already significantly surpasses SCP.

Prospects for the development and support of ERP

1C: ERP functionality is developing rapidly. 1C tries to release significant updates and additions to the functionality every quarter. Corrective releases, which fix discovered bugs and shortcomings, are released at almost the same frequency with which Microsoft releases similar updates for Windows. For ERP, they are published every 2-3 weeks.

In the future, there is no reason for the emergence of another product that will replace ERP - technologically, ERP fully complies with all the principles that development has reached. information technologies on this moment... Nothing revolutionary is expected on this front.

Some customers are afraid that 1C will release something new instead of ERP in order to make money on the update. In fact, 1C is easier and more profitable to receive a monthly fee for the release of updates and technical support for ERP. For large companies for this purpose, an expanded set of corporate support and support services was recently introduced.

At the time of writing this article (August 2015) - 1C has not yet announced when the UPP will be removed from support. A good tradition of the 1C company, which they promise to observe this time too, is a very early announcement of upcoming changes. Because UPP cannot be automatically updated to ERP, then "1C" promises to warn about the withdrawal of UPP from support 3 years before this happens. Those. At least by the end of 2018, the release of the necessary updates for the submission of regulated reporting is expected for the SCP.

At the same time, the functional UPP has not developed for a long time. If any new functions appear in UPP, it is mainly only to promote other services offered by 1C to the market. So in the UPP there were functions of integration with 1C: Document flow and the ability to exchange electronic invoices.

How to choose between SCP and ERP?

The choice between SCP and ERP has to be done in two cases:

1.When the current information system (and this is not the UPP) it is definitely necessary to change, or it is the UPP, which is very unhappy with and needs to be re-introduced.

2. When the current SCP system or an industry solution based on it, and it more or less copes with its tasks.

In the first case, I would highly recommend implementing ERP. The main reason for this recommendation is the overwhelming functional advantage of ERP over SCP, which will only gradually grow. In my practice, there have been no companies for which the standard configuration of the SCP was more suitable than the ERP. It is necessary, however, to make a reservation.

Currently, there are many industry solutions for SCP that are functional add-ons that better implement the requirements of a particular area. For ERP, some of these add-ons also exist, but here the choice is much less. In the event that your industry has a good standard PPM solution, it is more difficult to make recommendations about what is preferable for implementation. On the one hand, in ERP, even without taking into account the industry specifics, there will be more useful functions and they will be more methodically verified. The implementation of a number of such functions in the soft starter can be practically impossible, because it was for their implementation that the ERP was written entirely from scratch. On the other hand, ERP may lack very important and useful industry-specific features. In most cases, they are technically easy to implement in ERP, especially if you have an industry-specific solution on the UPP at hand as a sample, but nevertheless, transferring this functionality to ERP can be time-consuming and quite expensive.

Ultimately, if you have an industry solution, I would recommend using two different professionals familiar with the industry solution and with ERP so that they, in a discussion with people who deeply understand the relevant systems, can come to the conclusion which of the two systems is appropriate to implement. But in the event that ERP can be implemented without deep modifications, then it still has a very important advantage - the ability to easily expand the functionality of the system when new updates from 1C are released.

In the case when the business is satisfied with the current solution, I do not see the point of switching to ERP. Here you can cite the saying "The best is the enemy of the good." Is ERP better than SCP? Indisputably. But as mentioned above, it is too different. Therefore, when switching from SCP to ERP, there will be many complaints like "we liked the way it was before, do it as it was." There is also a small risk that the enterprise will fall into the small group of companies for which SCP is really more suitable. The reasons may be as follows:

1. The SCP was well implemented and perfectly tailored to the needs of the customer.

2. Very complex rules and bases for allocating production costs are used. It is planned to implement flexibility in ERP at the SCP level, but the typical ERP functionality loses a little in flexibility (they tried to make it simpler).

3. Fundamentally different accounting and management accounting. ERP contains convenient mechanisms for maintaining such differences when reflecting facts in accounting and management accounting in different periods. But in terms of cost accounting, ERP does not allow for the flexibility that SPM allows in some cases.

It is worth noting that on points 2 and 3, the 1C developers have already announced that they are planning to develop ERP functionality in this direction. However, at the current moment (end of 2015), these arguments still play in favor of SCP.

Last remark

It should be noted that all the above arguments are typical for the vast majority of companies. However, for a specific business, the benefits of each solution (SCP and ERP) may not be obvious. Especially when the company's employees lack in-depth knowledge of these products.

There are many more specialists with deep knowledge of SCP in the market than specialists with knowledge of ERP. UPP appeared on the market 10 years earlier, everyone has already studied it, moreover, it is less functional in terms of functionality, and is more focused on the type of thinking of “techies”. However, if in doubt about the choice, I recommend contacting consultants who are good at ERP. It is dangerous to contact specialists who only know SCP for the following reason - perhaps they simply do not want to strain and study a new product, because it is very large in functionality, it takes a long time to study it in detail. ERP consultants, in most cases, previously had experience in implementing different blocks of SCP and better understand the comparative capabilities of both products.

Oleg DEMIDENKO, Coderline company

[email protected]

(10 years of experience with 1C products, Specialist consultant for individual SCP and ERP modules),

August 2015

This article discusses the main distinctive features of accounting for fixed assets in 1C: ERP in comparison with 1C: UPP, links are provided to a more complete description for each section of accounting.

Two options for equipment accounting

In 1C: UPP, the purchased equipment is recorded on accounts 08.04 "Purchase of fixed assets" and 07 "Equipment for installation", the analytics of which are the reference books "Nomenclature" and "Warehouse". Thus, the purchased equipment is first entered into the "Nomenclature" directory, and then, upon acceptance for accounting, a new fixed asset is created in the "Fixed assets" directory.

In 1C: ERP, there are two options for equipment accounting:

Accounting for equipment on account 08.04.1 "Components of fixed assets". In this case, the receipt of equipment is reflected in the same way as 1C: UPP. Analytics of account 08.04.1 are also the directories "Nomenclature" and "Warehouse". Before taking into account equipment from account 08.04.1 “Components of fixed assets” must be written off to account 08.04.2 “Preparation for commissioning.” Further, the acceptance of fixed assets for accounting is reflected.
Accounting for equipment on account 08.04.2 "Preparation for commissioning". In this case, the equipment received is immediately reflected on account 08.04.2, the analytics of which are the directories "Objects of operation" (analogue of the directory "Fixed assets" in 1C: UPP) and " Cost items. ”When using this option, the equipment is not entered into the“ Nomenclature ”reference book, but is immediately reflected with analytics for that fixed asset, as or as part of which it will later be taken into account.

Availability of specialized documents for accounting for leased fixed assets and fixed assets leased

Unlike 1C: UPP, where all operations on leased fixed assets were reflected in the Operation (accounting and tax accounting) document, 1C: ERP provides special documents to reflect operations on leased fixed assets.

Also, 1C: ERP provides special documents to reflect operations on fixed assets leased out. It is possible to lease fixed assets own organization or to a third-party counterparty. In the case of the transfer of fixed assets to the lease of their own organization, the transfer documents form movements simultaneously both for the organization - the lessor and for the organization - the lessee. You do not need to enter a mirrored document.

Availability of specialized documents for accounting of fixed assets leasing

1C: ERP provides special documents to reflect operations on leasing fixed assets. For accounting of leasing agreements, a separate reference book "Leasing agreements" is used. The lease agreement specifies on whose balance sheet the leased property is registered and whether the leased asset is expected to be redeemed at the end of the lease term.

Receipt of the leased item, both in the case of accounting for the balance sheet, and in the case of accounting on the balance sheet, is reflected in the document "Receipt of leased items". At the same time, automatically, depending on the selected agreement, the leased asset is credited either to account 001 "Leased fixed assets" or to account 08.04 "Purchase of equipment" with further acceptance for accounting on account 01 "Fixed assets".

With both options for accounting for property (on the balance sheet / off balance sheet), the document “Receipt of leasing services” is entered every month at the end of the month. Under lease agreements with the “Beyond the Balance” property accounting option, this document reflects the receipt of leasing services. Leasing services are reflected according to the expense item selected in the document. Under lease agreements with the property accounting option "On the balance sheet", this document reflects leasing services and offset of the security deposit. Monthly recognition of lease payments in NU is performed by a routine operation generated automatically in the "Close of the month" processing.

Redemption of property leased under a leasing scheme, accounting for which was kept on an off-balance sheet account, if the redemption is provided for by the terms of the agreement, takes place under a separate agreement for the acquisition of future fixed assets, standard documents for working with non-current assets are used to process transactions.

Accounting for precious metals

1C: ERP implements accounting for the content of precious metals in fixed assets. Data on the precious metals contained in the fixed asset are recorded in the fixed asset card on the Precious materials tab. Precious materials are selected from the “Precious Materials and Stones” directory. For precious stones, the location of the precious stone is additionally indicated, the variants of which are presented in the figure below.

Presence of precious materials in fixed assets is reflected in printed forms documents for accepting fixed assets for accounting (forms OS-1, OS-1a, OS-1b), an inventory card (form OS-6), documents for writing off fixed assets (forms OS-4, OS-4a, OS-4b).

Revaluation of OS

Unlike 1C: UPP, where there was no specialized document for revaluation of fixed assets and therefore had to manually adjust the registers, 1C: ERP provides for the document “Revaluation of fixed assets”. This document is certainly not ideal - it does not have the ability to download from Excel and the ability to specify the revaluation factor, but the very fact of having of this document - this is already a big plus, since it moves all the necessary ledgers for accounting for fixed assets. And the loading of fixed assets from an Excel file, as a rule, provided by appraisers that revalue fixed assets, is not difficult to modify if desired.

_____________________________________________________

The main differences between 1C: ERP and 1C: UPP?

The question is also relevant because now an increasing number of manufacturing enterprises moves from foreign SAP to domestic counterparts due to the high cost of maintaining the imported program and inconsistencies in working with Russian legislation. In this article, we will briefly consider what are the main differences between SCP and ERP, what are their strengths and what are the capabilities of their functionals.

What is the difference between 1C: UPP and 1C: ERP?

It should be noted right away that both programs, although they are similar in their mission - business automation in unified system, however, have a number of differences that favorably distinguish one from another. Here, the choice depends on the goals of automation, features management accounting and organizational structures companies (whether they are simple enterprises without divisions, holding structures or groups of companies).

Mainly, both programs differ from each other in the implemented functionality. If the maximum possible maximum was initially implemented in the SCP, then the ERP functionality can be configured in the process of direct implementation of the program at the enterprise. Those. setting up 1C: UPP is the implementation of the program immediately with the maximum possible functionality, and the implementation of 1C: ERP is a whole process, which is setting up the program for the specifics of your business and equipping it with those functions that may be needed to reflect the business processes taking place to be exactly at your enterprise. Let us summarize once again that even the revision of UPP 1.3 does not have the capabilities that the erp modules have. Yes, the SCP is equipped with a universal set of functions that can be used immediately without unnecessary settings, but also with many unnecessary functions that may not be needed at all in the process of enterprise management.

In addition, new subsystems have been implemented in the 1C: ERP program, similar functionality of which in 1C: UPP is scattered across different sections. For example, the Marketing and Planning subsystem in ERP is implemented with maximum consideration for all the needs that may arise during the work of the department. There is no such section in the SCP, and similar functions are scattered across several sections. Some functions are found in Purchasing, some in Sales, Planning or Production, which is extremely inconvenient and ineffective.

Also in ERP, the Sales section has been improved, which includes the functionality implemented in the UPP, and combines the functions of other similar sections of the UPP. In addition to the SCP functionality, additional features have been introduced into ERP, which greatly facilitate the work of sales specialists. For example, in ERP, you can manage sales representatives, work with complaints, and more.

A significant distinguishing feature of 1C: ERP is also the fact of a dedicated Warehouse section. In 1C: UPP warehouse functions scattered in different sections, which, firstly, is inconvenient, and secondly, it often leads to temporary losses when reflecting warehouse tasks.

Plus, the 1C: ERP software solution is equipped with a well-thought-out Budgeting section. It introduces flexible and useful features to create and manage the actual data of each individual subsystem. Such accounting for 1C: SCP is a longer, laborious and confusing process. Users who know all the nuances of the business processes of their enterprise and reflect them in the program will appreciate the functionality of the section at its true worth - it is simple, convenient and comprehensive.

In general, I would like to note that both programs undoubtedly each have their own advantages. It all depends on the goals of automation and the structure of the business to be automated. If this is a simple production that does not require special functions in control, then most likely it can be automated using the soft starter program. If the business has a complex holding structure, then ERP work is needed here, which takes into account the best domestic and world experience in the automation of complex tiered production. As a matter of fact, the whole concept of erp is based on maximally covering all business processes at the enterprise, linking them in one system operating in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation. Many believe that the cost of the SCP is lower than the cost of ERP, and this is a strong argument in favor of the former. However, even taking into account the fact that the price is more attractive when choosing from the UPP, the multifunctionality of the ERP takes over.

It might be helpful to read: